https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991294
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
Bug ID: 991314
Summary: Review Request: libscrypt - scrypt() library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329
--- Comment #44 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #43)
you should use find to find the la files
Says who? The only thing that matters is that they are removed.
There are many ways to achieve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
techn...@lolware.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991294
--- Comment #2 from Marcelo Barbosa firemanxbr mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
---
Hi Christopher,
Thank your for review, this package was adjusted:
URL SPEC:
http://firemanxbr.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-appdirs/python-appdirs.spec
URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991319
Bug ID: 991319
Summary: Review Request: python-applib - Cross-platform
application utilities for Python originally
implemented for PyPM
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991294
Marcelo Barbosa firemanxbr mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991319
Marcelo Barbosa firemanxbr mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Since it's actually ISC, I vote for ASL 2.0 and ISC.
However, putting a comment about this in the spec won't hurt either.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986991
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986991
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949073
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
check-mk-1.2.2-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.2-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949073
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
check-mk-1.2.2-5.fc18.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/check-mk-1.2.2-5.fc18.1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
Pierre pierrejourda...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|17 |18
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
Pierre pierrejourda...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991339
Bug ID: 991339
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sdoc - RDoc generator to build
searchable HTML documentation for Ruby code
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Oh, forgot a link for static library:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329
--- Comment #45 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libzen/master/libzen.spec
SRPM URL:
http://koji.russianfedora.ru/koji/getfile?taskID=82976name=libzen-0.4.29-2.fc20.R.src.rpm
0. Updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329
--- Comment #46 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Ralf, do you still have questions against this package here?
If not, I will change flag.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991349
Bug ID: 991349
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jbuilder - Create JSON
structures via a Builder-style DSL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988789
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990422
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jstri...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990422
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988310
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329
--- Comment #47 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
From comment 3:
* Do not ship static libs (*.a)
* Do not ship libtool *.la's
That has been very clear, IMO. Except that the packaging guidelines ought to
comment on libtool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961364
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
--- Comment #7 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lbjp-common-trio-2.3.10-2/glite-lbjp-common-trio.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988310
--- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com ---
Please fix:
* Remove this commented line as it has no value nor purpose and it's confusing.
#cp %{gem_name}.gemspec %{buildroot}/%{gem_spec}
* Remove shebang from non-executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991370
Bug ID: 991370
Summary: Review Request: python-numpydoc - Sphinx extension to
support docstrings in Numpy format
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961364
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||980281
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957053
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
here is the result of koji build. It seems OK for me...
Please add a comment in the spec file above the ExclusiveArch line. The
groonga package should do that, too. Its %changelog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960645
--- Comment #8 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
EPEL support is still missing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960645
--- Comment #9 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
And the package doesn't compile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980318
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991294
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|unspecified
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991319
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|unspecified
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
Oh, and for desktop-file-install, the rule is that you must run EITHER
desktop-file-install OR desktop-file-validate on each *.desktop file, both do
the same validations (and there's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985753
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Run rpmlint (or rpmlint -I for more helpful output) on the src.rpm and all
built rpms. Feel free to ignore obvious false positives in the report, but fix
anything else. Preferably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985753
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Statically Linking Executables
I don't understand comment 7. This package builds a single executable, not a
library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
--- Comment #3 from Joshua Small techn...@lolware.net ---
Hi Christopher,
Many thanks for this review. Going through your points:
Name: Done.
0: I had a paragraph here, and rpmlint told me to write something smaller :p I
think I've come up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
Jindrich Luza jl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991400
Bug ID: 991400
Summary: Review Request: myrulib - E-Book Library Manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967689
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tsung-1.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
404
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658754
--- Comment #55 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
E.g. proper form is
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{cubrid_version}.%{build_version}-%{release}
Why not simply
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
?
Once a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858079
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858079
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961364
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961364
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986991
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986991
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866312
Pierre-Yves Luyten p...@luyten.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
jluza is not in the packager group.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990279
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990279
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858079
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858079
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.7.git20130510.fb72a057.fc19 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858079
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.7.git20130510.fb72a057.fc18 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877810
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989850
--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
Apart from the licensing issue in plibc this package is okay.
The POSIX symbols pipe and mmap aren't available on win32, so if you want to
continue this route you'd have to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #17 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
for EPEL-6 you will need to BR: cmake28 as RHEL-6 carries cmake in version 2.6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909
Bug 915909 depends on bug 915903, which changed state.
Bug 915903 Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtjsbackend - Qt5 - QtJSBackend
component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915910
Bug 915910 depends on bug 915909, which changed state.
Bug 915909 Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtdeclarative - Qt5 - QtDeclarative
component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915006
Bug 915006 depends on bug 915909, which changed state.
Bug 915909 Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtdeclarative - Qt5 - QtDeclarative
component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
* Run rpmlint (or rpmlint -I for more helpful output) on the src.rpm and all
built rpms. Feel free to ignore obvious false positives in the report, but fix
anything else. Preferably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
--- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
You're correct about the patch. It's something which needs to be removed.
Updated Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991314
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
$ rpmls -p libscrypt-1.12-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/libscrypt.so.0
chmod 0755
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915006
--- Comment #30 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
fyi, still waiting on angleproject dep to build this, bug #967234
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991531
Bug ID: 991531
Summary: Review Request: sartgraph - draw ASCII bargraph of sar
stats
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991531
Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991531
--- Comment #2 from Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 782068
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=782068action=edit
screenshot
a screen-shot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991531
Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||sartgraph
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991221
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991221
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Forgot to mention rpmlint status:
W: invalid-license Intel → should be fixed when the license is corrected to BSD
W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime → runtime is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980318
--- Comment #22 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #21)
Mario: Referring to bug #990236, please be more careful next time.
Well, I will try it. But it's actually not the task of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980318
--- Comment #23 from Marcelo Barbosa firemanxbr
mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com ---
Hi everbody,
Sorry for the my mistake, but we are all human and we are always learning, I
hope that this mistake is not repeated again, thank you for your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990627
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
FC 20 koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5693733
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958585
--- Comment #9 from Roger Light ro...@atchoo.org ---
Thanks, but I'm trying to keep my packaging efforts low :) It's already a big
effort doing a release with what I already do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.0.0-0.6.git20130510.f2840834.fc18,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.1.0-1.fc18,mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.0158ce78.fc18
has been submitted as an update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858069
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.0.0-0.6.git20130510.f2840834.fc19 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 19.
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo