https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953514
--- Comment #12 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
I think you should post to the varnish-dist list. But I think the main devs'
answer will be something along the lines I got when I asked for this on IRC:
"Don't package vmods until 4.0".
:-/
Ingvar
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994399
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Jan Grul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994429
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Jan Grul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994552
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Jan Grul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994543
--- Comment #7 from Jan Grulich ---
Updated
Spec URL: http://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/kdesdk-kioslaves.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/kdesdk-kioslaves-4.11.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996780
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
Are you going to take care EL5?
And, is the encoding mistake fixed by upstream now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996780
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: [name |Rename Request:
|ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996792
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989842
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #17 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
svni-0.36.2-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/svni-0.36.2-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813
Abel Luck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813
Bug ID: 996813
Summary: Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996792
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Ralp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
As this package has not pushed into F-19 stable yet, it is much better to
bumping release, fixing changelog than to leave inconsistent changelog. Leaving
this unfixed makes it harder to fix this later.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996792
Bug ID: 996792
Summary: Review Request: python-fedmsg-meta-debian - Metadata
providers for Debian's fedmsg deployment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996780
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996780
Bug ID: 996780
Summary: Review Request: [name change] python-astroid - Python
Abstract Syntax Tree New Generation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994552
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Rex Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994552
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994543
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
1. better url:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdesdk/kdesdk-kioslaves
2. drop epoch from Conflicts, should be:
Conflicts: kdesdk-common < 4.10.80
3. license not ok
perldoc is GPLv2
svn inc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994543
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994434
--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
1. better url:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdesdk/kompare
2. licensing, main pkg should be:
License: GPLv2+ and GFDL
add
%doc COPYING.DOC
(some parts of libdiff2 and headers are LGPLv2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994434
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994429
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Rex Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994429
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994399
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Rex Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994399
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
tinyxml2-1.0.11-3.20130805git0323851.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tinyxml2-1.0.11-3.20130805git0323851.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
tinyxml2-1.0.11-3.20130805git0323851.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tinyxml2-1.0.11-3.20130805git0323851.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
--- Comment #12 from François Cami ---
Thank you Jon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z7B1jRWIt0&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990272
--- Comment #4 from Dan Williams ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> Why can't you bump the version? Is it too hard for you to do that?
Bump which version?
> One issue: You should avoid using %{__rm}.
Do you mean that the sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982351
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dpri...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994434
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5812705
$ rpmlint -i -v *
kompare.src: I: checking
kompare.src: I: checking-url http://www.kde.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
kompare.src:26
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
Simon A. Erat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #786227|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996311
--- Comment #4 from John C Peterson ---
Spec URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~jcp/perl-CAD-Format-STL.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~jcp/perl-CAD-Format-STL-0.2.1-3.fc19.src.rpm
This version incorporates Michael's suggestion to use the logic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989359
--- Comment #5 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
> And what's this:
>
> find %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/gimp/2.0
That was used to check the integrity of files. Removed.
> Also
>
> Have you checked this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
Simon A. Erat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #786213|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #9 from Axilleas Pipinellis ---
Crap, I forgot it.
How should I fix it now? I should do a version bump for it to rebuild and get
the change to the repos, right?
Should I add two more changelogs, one about the version update (0.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
--- Comment #7 from Simon A. Erat ---
Created attachment 786226
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=786226&action=edit
SRPM 0.8.3 - fixes #3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
Simon A. Erat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #786206|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
Simon A. Erat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #786112|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
At least please fix changelog.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j43pgA6VAR&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
--- Comment #4 from Simon A. Erat ---
Created attachment 786205
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=786205&action=edit
Specfile 0.8.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993636
Veaceslav Mindru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mind...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530
--- Comment #3 from Björn Esser ---
Lots of rpmlint issues:
Rpmlint
---
Checking: script-tools-0.8.2-beta.fc20.x86_64.rpm
script-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Diffrent -> Different,
Diff rent, Diff-rent
script-tools.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|kde-plasma-ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #7 from Axilleas Pipinellis ---
A(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
>
> > > 3, Should the license be "X11 or MIT" (taken from the README)? Since only
> > > MIT is included as a standalone file and in the .gemspec, it's proba
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957053
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
groonga-normalizer-mysql-1.0.5-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/groonga-normalizer-mysql-1.0.5-4.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957053
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995280
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HrIBs2yVxo&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995280
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993324
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O9nixkd0Gh&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993324
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996618
Bug ID: 996618
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ancestry - Organize
ActiveRecord model into a tree structure
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841483
--- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler ---
The Summary should be "Plasmoid checking for new messages", the %description
should be "Plasmoid periodically checking for new messages in configured
accounts.".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888385
Yohan Graterol changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859
--- Comment #7 from Yohan Graterol ---
Can you change the permissions? find -name '*.so' | xargs chmod 644
Try and re-upload the spec file and SRPM, please.
If with that not work fine, we wait the answer from upstream.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995280
Yohan Graterol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Yohan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989842
Yohan Graterol changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996222
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande ---
Hi Christopher.
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> Why manpages are only for Fedora?
Because for an unknown reason, help2man in RHEL6 repos doesn't work.
Try you by compiling ProDy in epe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993324
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ fedora-cvs?
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993324
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #785775|review+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #28 from Michael Schwendt ---
See comment 16 and comment 17 and the bottom of file
"./tests/Makefile.include". The Python related tests are conditional and are
only executed when HAVE_PYTHON is defined. In the clean koji buildroot,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pathtools-0.1.2-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996186
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-argh-0.23.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-argh-0.23.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996186
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-argh-0.23.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-argh-0.23.2-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996186
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-argh-0.23.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-argh-0.23.2-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059
Mark McLoughlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RlvIpUMCSv&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996186
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996186
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FhssRGnSyL&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IL7lo8RXUr&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996088
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I5tjbX3qSI&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996059
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eUB6ahwlpx&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996042
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996232
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Deutsch ---
(In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6)> pocl-libs.x86_64: W:
shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpocl.so.1.1.0
> exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
>
> I will get in contact with upstream about this
the "calls exit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995175
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dDhnmwef5A&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995175
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993324
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996232
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Deutsch ---
(In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #7)
> (In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6)
> > pocl-libs.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libpoclu.so.1.1.0
> > clGetDeviceInfo
> > pocl-libs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989866
--- Comment #5 from Yohan Graterol ---
You're right! I'm check it in my computer.
Koji built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5811692
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993324
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
fedora-review flag not set to '+'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=50Bwppjbgx&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=faeN8bx4IM&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995974
--- Comment #27 from Mike Manilone ---
Sorry, I gave the wrong result (or excuse). It did work but didn't succeed. It
stopped at "make test" and complained about "no package named bson", but this
is not expected - I don't have python-bson insta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996232
Fabian Deutsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdeut...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
Axilleas Pipinellis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #3 from Axilleas Pipinellis ---
(In reply to Josef Stribny from comment #2)
> 1, Please remove the trailing white space:
> * after BuildRequires: rubygems-devel
> * after BuildRequires: rubygem(test-unit)
>
Hmm, for some reason th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988545
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
stout-0.1.2-1.099483f.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stout-0.1.2-1.099483f.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo