https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961237
--- Comment #21 from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au ---
On 09/08/13 09:38, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961237
--- Comment #20 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Created attachment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-gdk3.spec
mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-gdk3-2.0.2-1.fc.src.rpm
* Sun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912961
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-gtk3.spec
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-gnome2-suite/rubygem-gtk3-2.0.2-1.fc.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998459
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961237
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969580
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
What about the packages for the requested branches? They have been built, but I
can see only rawhide and f20 ones for the time being.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927458
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
What about the packages? Nothing has been built yet. Any problems...?
However, I don't need rospack for me, but it would be nice if we could close
this review request soon.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852254
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895226
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821296
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739263
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000718
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799
Bug ID: 1000799
Summary: Review Request: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency
on a Linux system using cgroups
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799
--- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info ---
Now bundles parts of bc, coreutils, libproc.
Upstream bug for that: https://github.com/poelzi/ulatencyd/issues/46
NotRedy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info ---
Not a problem -
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/cc774a5485a23e84d2d62fe98409c676cbc79519
Scratch build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996222
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #2)
Hi Christopher.
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
Why manpages are only for Fedora?
Because for an unknown reason,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961237
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000731
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976847
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-amqp-1.0.11-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-amqp-1.0.11-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991280
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000445
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000731
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
%cmake \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=%{_lib} \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_DOCDIR=%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} \
-DCMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=$(echo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991280
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990940
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997478
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Bug ID: 1000829
Summary: Review Request: linpack - FORTRAN subroutines to
analyze and solve linear equations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Some questions:
1. I can see ifarch here, why not use ifarch to install files, but just add
more subpackages?
2. devel/static packages description are not good:
Example:
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
--- Comment #2 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
Some questions:
1. I can see ifarch here, why not use ifarch to install files, but just add
more subpackages?
%ifarch is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816565
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816565
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974737
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998459
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000862
Bug ID: 1000862
Summary: Review Request: emacs-mallard-mode - Emacs major mode
for editing Mallard pages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000862
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000862
--- Comment #2 from Jaromir Hradilek jhradi...@gmail.com ---
Thank you very much, Christopher. I have updated both the spec file and the
SRPM package according to your advice.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000870
Bug ID: 1000870
Summary: Review Request: nini - An uncommonly powerful .NET
configuration library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=98
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000885
Bug ID: 1000885
Summary: Tracker: Review Requests for Design related packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000885
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Tracking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000885
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||98
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000885
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||FE-DESIGN
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982192
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Some initial comments:
* Software Collection macros
- I don't know well about the current status of SCL, however
it you want to add SCL macros, please follow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Additional commens
* rpmlint
- Please fix below
rubygem-single_test.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gems/gems/single_test-0.6.0/lib/single_test/tasks.rb
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998459
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Some initial comments:
* MRI specfic Requires:
- Does BuildRequires: ruby = 1.8.7 mean that BR really
needs MRI ruby?
* Virtual (Build)Requires preferred
- Please use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886871
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
59 matches
Mail list logo