https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904639
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904640
Bug 904640 depends on bug 904639, which changed state.
Bug 904639 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-unf - Wrapper library to bring
Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904639
Wha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008083
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Shakthi Kannan from comment #6)
> The scratch build got cancelled for F21 x86_64 and i686. The same with F20:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6019328
Yes sorry I was aw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861502
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
Bug ID: 1015492
Summary: Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file
reading, writing, and validation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015491
Bug ID: 1015491
Summary: Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file
reading, writing, and validation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual ---
*** Bug 1015491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015491
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual ---
This is the python3 version of python-configobj. Upstream doesn' want to
maintain a python3 port. But the original author of configobj has "blessed"
this as the method to obtain a python3 compatible packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
--- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual ---
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014665
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
--- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual ---
Update, fixes a bug that was in python-configobj also
Spec URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python3-configobj.spec
SRPM URL:
http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python3-configobj-4.7.2-2.20131004hg10adc6e7d759
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996202
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996202
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014336
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Erik Johnson from comment #6)
> (In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #5)
> > Last but not least, please get rid of the spec parts which are only needed
> > for EPEl 5 once your pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013807
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014336
--- Comment #9 from Erik Johnson ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #8)
> Indeed, all these things are only needed for EPEL 5. For EPEL >= 6 and all
> currently supported Fedora versions, they are useless, because rpm defaults
> t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.bad...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
--- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi ---
Note: python3 subpackages should only be added if upstream supports the package
on python3. Otherwise a separate package should be made. See the warning
here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986615
Matthew Farrellee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #9 from Matthew Miller ---
How much had I forgotten all about this? A lot. Sorry. Will put it on my
near-term todo list.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #8)
> Please rename it to python-png or python-pypng. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Toshio Ernie Kuratomi from comment #3)
> Note: python3 subpackages should only be added if upstream supports the
> package on python3.
Yes, the source seems to be 2/3 compatible.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014336
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014336
--- Comment #11 from Erik Johnson ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #10)
> BTW, we keep all our spec files in source control, in our Fedora Git repo ;)
Yes, I'm aware.
> Probably you mean Github or anything else. It's the same
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014336
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959942
Yohan Graterol changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014336
--- Comment #13 from Erik Johnson ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #12)
> (In reply to Erik Johnson from comment #11)
> > No problem, thanks for your time and for the recommendations, this is my
> > first package submission and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868266
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|projec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015700
Bug ID: 1015700
Summary: python-iscpy - Python library to parse ISC style
config files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
Bug ID: 1015701
Summary: Review Request: amiri-fonts - Arabic font form
amirifont.org
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #9)
> How much had I forgotten all about this? A lot. Sorry. Will put it on my
> near-term todo list.
>
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015492
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
--- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Toshio Ernie Kuratomi from comment #3)
> > Note: python3 subpackages should only be added if upstream supports the
> > packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013807
Daniel Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Daniel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996202
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996202
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-mongodb-1.3.19-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-mongodb-1.3.19-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Toshio Ernie Kuratomi from comment #5)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Toshio Ernie Kuratomi from comment #3)
> > > Note: python3 sub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916039
--- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer ---
I own a package (cronolog) that hasn't had an upstream release in 11 years, but
it continues to build, and I use it every day on many servers at my work. So
it's possible :) Of course, it's a small C applicati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
Pete Travis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008778
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
--- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #6)
> Experience seems to suggest otherwise: many packages are slow to get python
> 3 support, but once it happens, they usually don't drop it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015749
Bug ID: 1015749
Summary: Review Request: php-twig-CTwig - Extension to improve
performance of Twig
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Toshio Ernie Kuratomi from comment #7)
[snip]
> Anyhow, the Packaging Guidelines specify that unless upstream supports
> building the python3 package not to build it as a subpack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015162
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015162
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Koji scratchbuild for Rawhide:
* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6026858
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015162
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is almost silent
Auriga ~: rpmlint ~/Desktop/xorg-x11-drv-wayland-*
xorg-x11-drv-wayland.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015752
Bug ID: 1015752
Summary: Review Request: qt5-qtx11extras - Qt5 - X11 support
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015752
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
Alias
53 matches
Mail list logo
