https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015857
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-googlecode-sqlite-0-0.8.hg74691fb6f837.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #14 from Ryan O'Hara roh...@redhat.com ---
It appears the git repo didn't get created. I'm unable to clone
openstack-puppet-modules and I see no repo on pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Perhaps
I'm missing something?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017814
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996311
--- Comment #6 from John C Peterson j...@eskimo.com ---
Spec URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~jcp/perl-CAD-Format-STL.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~jcp/perl-CAD-Format-STL-0.2.1-4.fc19.src.rpm
Hi Petr,
Thank you for taking time out to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Another note is that filtering out python sitearch libs is not required from
Fedora 20, you don't need to do this anymore.
I suggest that you should remove this in master branch in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018859
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
I think you forgot to update the SPEC url.
The license is not MIT I think.
I opened this upstream issue
https://github.com/sebfisch/primes/issues/2
since the License file seems to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009842
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013485
--- Comment #2 from Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Initial notes:
* License
- It seems that the correct license tag for -doc subpackage
should be ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and MIT. Would you
check this? (see attached)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 813204
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=813204action=edit
license analysis result
My license analysis result
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013485
--- Comment #3 from Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com ---
I've also just noticed that quixote_handler and scgi_server are in both bindir
and python_sitearch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 813218
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=813218action=edit
1-ghc-primes.spec.patch
I was suggesting something like these changes in my earlier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
Michal Minar mimi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1019977 |1020166
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017814
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
FIX: mkdb/metaphon.c states its license is 'Public domain' explicitly. The
License tag should reflect it.
FIX: Don't mention the BSD license. You're removing the bundled code and using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019603
--- Comment #3 from Michal Minar mimi...@redhat.com ---
Check out new SRPM:
http://miminar.fedorapeople.org/openlmi-scripts-0.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm
All the above errors except for the 'lmi' one should be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096
--- Comment #20 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
There's no such package as perl-Jdb or anything providing perl(Jdb); could you
explain that obsoletes/provides?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017814
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Updated package is on the same URLs.
(I just wonder that nobody cares about License tag in source packages).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #2)
Kohi scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6061098
MUST
[!]: Package meets the Packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996311
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996311
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
--- Comment #8 from Vladan Popovic vpopo...@redhat.com ---
Can't beleive I forgot this, sorry.
It should be ok now, I ran rpmlint and it doesn't complain.
https://github.com/vladan/python-alchimia-rpm/raw/master/python-alchimia.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019453
--- Comment #2 from Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/sddm/sddm-kcm.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/sddm/sddm-kcm-0.0.0-0.1.20131015gitafdda33c.fc19.src.rpm
Notes:
1. There is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
Martin Edlman martin.edl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018859
Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@atreides.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #25 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
No, gcc-c++ not needed in BR because
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018862
--- Comment #4 from Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@atreides.org.uk ---
Updated files with fixes for all TODO and FIX items.
Spec URL: http://georgiou.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-SearchPath.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
Bug ID: 1020292
Summary: Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital
currency
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Additional notes:
* Test suite files
- Current ruby guidelines says not to include files under
test/ into binary rpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
First of all thanks for the review!
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #5)
I mostly agree on those python macro... but we have approve this ;)
Likely we are going to see if/else
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020309
Bug ID: 1020309
Summary: Review Request: kde-connect - KDE Connect client for
communication with smartphones
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020309
Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
--- Comment #26 from Martin Edlman martin.edl...@gmail.com ---
Ohh, I see. Sorry :-/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018626
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
As this bug has been reopened, I will review this again.
Great to see that people work together! :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, not sure what happened, should be fine now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018588
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018588
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018859
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018859
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
Bug 1017645 depends on bug 1017628, which changed state.
Bug 1017628 Summary: Review Request: solr3 - Apache Solr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017628
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/hibernate-search/2/hibernate-search.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013485
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014544
--- Comment #21 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
OK new release under GPL only:
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/almohawell.spec
SRPM : http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/almohawell-9.3.2-1.oji.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
Looks good. Here is my formal
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is silent
work ~/Desktop: rpmlint libodb-boost-*
libodb-boost.src: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975315
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018905
--- Comment #11 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
Looks fine now.
Thank you, Zbigniew.
Rpmlint only complains about spelling, all false positives.
Yeah, noticed those
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975317
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975318
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975316
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-openshift-origin-dns-nsupdate-1.10.2.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
Bug ID: 1020404
Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Peek - Peek into archives
without extracting them
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
Michael Hampton er...@ioerror.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@ioerror.us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gumbo-parser-1.0-0.2.20131001gitd90ea2b.fc19 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gumbo-parser-1.0-0.2.20131001gitd90ea2b.fc18 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997780
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gumbo-parser-1.0-0.2.20131001gitd90ea2b.fc20 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #17 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com ---
Actually package only contains files in /usr/share/puppet/modules/...
and that does seem sensible on the face of it.
I've confirmed the git repo is now available.
thanks.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
Bug ID: 1020435
Summary: Review Request: perl-jmx4perl - JSON-HTTP based acess
to a remote JMX agent
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@atreides.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1018862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018862
Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@atreides.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1020435
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
Bug ID: 1020456
Summary: Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to
manage development environments
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020457
Bug ID: 1020457
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-vagrant-kvm - KVM plugin for
Vagrant
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
Warren Togami wtog...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wtog...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019902
Alex Drahon adra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|998503 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020457
Alex Drahon adra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||998503
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
Alex Drahon adra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||998503
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019902
Alex Drahon adra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
Bug ID: 1020467
Summary: Review Request: python-scss - A Scss compiler for
Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020468
Bug ID: 1020468
Summary: Review Request: ucpp - Embeddable, quick, light and
fully compliant ISO C99 preprocessor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019948
--- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch chrisder...@gmail.com ---
Thank you very much, Björn! Created new spec and source rpm to fix the issues:
Spec URL:
http://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-astroML/v2/python-astroML.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018533
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018523
Bug 1018523 depends on bug 1018533, which changed state.
Bug 1018533 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-systemd - Go
bindings to systemd socket activation, journal and D-BUS APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015857
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018540
Bug 1018540 depends on bug 1018057, which changed state.
Bug 1018057 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-goprotobuf - Go support
for Google protocol buffers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010725
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|qt5-qttranslations-5.1.1-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018501
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018523
Bug 1018523 depends on bug 1018501, which changed state.
Bug 1018501 Summary: Review Request: golang-bitbucket-kardianos-osext -
Extensions to the standard Go OS package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018501
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014
--- Comment #3 from Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se ---
D'oh. Of course there is a %build. :)
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6072006
Spec URL: http://kupo.se/pub/review/pylcdsysinfo.spec
SRPM URL:
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
