https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979794
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 813932
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=813932&action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979794
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979794
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018541
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hi Michael,
Updated:
* Sat Oct 19 2013 Ankur Sinha -
0-0.1.20110810svn475
- Update as per review: #1018541
- Update version
- Remove unrequired portions
- File inclusions
- Initial rpmbuild
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745515
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #31
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877152
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
--- Comment #12 from Michael Hampton ---
(In reply to Warren Togami from comment #10)
> Regarding selinux ...
>
> /etc/bitcoin(/.*)?
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:bitcoin_conf_t,s0)
> /usr/bin/bitcoind --
> g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019824
--- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean ---
Got it! Here's a third release including docs and fixing the hashbang issue.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-dopy.spec
SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-dopy-0.2.2-3.fc19.src.rpm
In case
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877152
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
> latest release depend on springframework >= 3.2.4.RELEASE
and springframework > 3.1.4.RELEASE depend on cglib >= 3.0 (unavailable see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
--- Comment #2 from Thibault North ---
Thanks for the comments!
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> There's a typo in sed:
> sed -i 's|BLOSC_VERSION_PATCH 6|BLOSC_VERSION_PATCH 6|' CMakeLists.txt
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018588
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
gssntlmssp-0.2.0-0.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gssntlmssp-0.2.0-0.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018588
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
gssntlmssp-0.2.0-0.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gssntlmssp-0.2.0-0.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018533
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.3.git68bc612.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.3.git68bc612.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018533
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.3.git68bc612.fc19 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.3.git68bc612.fc19
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018533
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.3.git68bc612.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.3.git68bc612.fc20
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741706
Cristian Ciupitu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmar...@learningobjects.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Thibault North changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #4 from Thibault Nor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #34 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Sorry, meant to update this to the latest upstream last night but I forgot.
:-(
--
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-0.10.6-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
--- Comment #11 from Warren Togami ---
Currently bitcoind is not well suited to operate as a system service.
The user's bitcoind as a RPC client could hypothetically operate to control the
system bitcoind, but that isn't true of the user's bi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877152
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
latest release depend on springframework >= 3.2.4.RELEASE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877152
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #4)
> Some initial comments:
>
> - 2.1.4 is out
latest release depend on springframework >= 3.2.2.RELEASE we have 3.1.1
> - I see both springframework-* and spring-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877152
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014344
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014344
Bug 1014344 depends on bug 1014353, which changed state.
Bug 1014353 Summary: Review Request: php-lightopenid - PHP OpenID library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014353
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014344
Bug 1014344 depends on bug 1014385, which changed state.
Bug 1014385 Summary: Review Request: openid-selector - A user-friendly way to
select an OpenID
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014385
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964318
Johan Swensson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@kupo.se
--- Comment #3 from Joha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014040
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|clinfo-0.1-0.2.git20131001. |clinfo-0.1-0.2.git20131001.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009750
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-falcon-0.1.7-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009750
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-falcon-0.1.7-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018540
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Lo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021017
Bug ID: 1021017
Summary: Review Request: lexertl - Modular lexical analyzer
generator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966222
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966223
Bug 966223 depends on bug 966222, which changed state.
Bug 966222 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-bignumber-js - Library for decimal
and non-decimal arithmetic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966222
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #4 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Ok , rewiting in progress >>>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
--- Comment #10 from Warren Togami ---
Regarding selinux ...
/etc/bitcoin(/.*)?
gen_context(system_u:object_r:bitcoin_conf_t,s0)
/usr/bin/bitcoind --
gen_context(system_u:object_r:bitcoin_exec_t,s0)
/var/lib/bi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
--- Comment #2 from Arun S A G ---
I will do the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020457
--- Comment #2 from Arun S A G ---
I will do the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
--- Comment #1 from Kostas Georgiou ---
Updated spec and srpm
Spec URL: http://georgiou.fedorapeople.org//perl-jmx4perl.spec
SRPM URL: http://georgiou.fedorapeople.org//perl-jmx4perl-1.07-4.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Jakub Ruzicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
--- Comment #15 from Matthew Miller ---
Yeah I think it's just waiting builds :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
--- Comment #14 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
%changelog
* Fri Oct 18 2013 Lokesh Mandvekar 0-0.4.git79847ab
- buildrequires golang
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Mare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson ---
Going through the review process, consider all 'MUST' and 'SHOULD' elements as
OK unless posted here...
rpmlint output:
[adamw@vaioz noarch]$ rpmlint fedora-gooey-karma-0.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
fedora-go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
--- Comment #13 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Vincent Batts from comment #11)
>
> does this still build fine if the rpm is installed on the host that is
> trying to do a new build of the RPM?
> Is setting of GOBIN needed? or passing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|awill...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.7.hg61664b8425f3.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.7.hg61664b8425f3.el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson ---
Why is the .desktop file marked "OnlyShowIn=GNOME;" ? Is there some reason it
won't work on other desktops?
The app not having an icon is kinda bad, you could ask if the art team could
provide you with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
I might change the Source0 to
https://github.com/blaskovic/fedora-gooey-karma/archive/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
, as that's what the file is actually called once it gets through github's
magic.
fedora-g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
--- Comment #1 from Flavio Percoco ---
Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/cresnjp786qgj83/jq.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ky9fmuzo1ruu3x7/jq-1.3-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Newton ---
Fair enough, it'll be a place holder until I'm ready to tackle it or if someone
else has more time on their hands and want's to take it.
Thanks Dan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017401
--- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt ---
Updated Release:
SPEC file: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-primes/ghc-primes.spec
SRPM-file
http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ghc-primes/ghc-prime-0.2.1.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005901
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.7.hg61664b8425f3.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.7.hg61664b8425f3.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020467
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
The shebang-lines patch has been merged upstream, but there has not yet been a
new upstream release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020457
--- Comment #1 from Alex Drahon ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://srpms.adrahon.org/rubygem-vagrant-kvm.spec
SRPM URL: http://srpms.adrahon.org/rubygem-vagrant-kvm-0.1.4-1.1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
--- Comment #1 from Alex Drahon ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://srpms.adrahon.org/vagrant.spec
SRPM URL: http://srpms.adrahon.org/vagrant-1.3.3-1.1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016943
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter ---
Odd, this build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=442156
definitely builds and links against kde4 stuff.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020961
Bug ID: 1020961
Summary: Review Request: jq - Command-line JSON processor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016943
--- Comment #8 from Ben Nemec ---
Great, thanks! I'll revisit this next week some time.
FWIW, the existing crystal does install under KDE 4, but it doesn't show up in
the window decorations list because 1.0.5 is still from the KDE 3 version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6075372
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018626
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= ISSUES
1. Please add %{_libdir}/faketime, as that dir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
Whiteboard|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
Bug ID: 1020942
Summary: Package Request: wxGTK3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920541
--- Comment #2 from Ales Ledvinka ---
current locations
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/openlmi-proxy.git/tree/schema/packaging/openlmi-proxy-schema.spec
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/o/p/openlmi-proxy/openlmi-proxy-schema-0.1.1-1.fc20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020940
Bug ID: 1020940
Summary: Review Request: openlmi-proxy-service - configure and
register proxy providers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020936
Bug ID: 1020936
Summary: Review Request: openlmi-proxy-common - shared code of
provider setup service and redirector/aggregator
itself
Product: Fedora
Version: r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320
--- Comment #19 from Pádraig Brady ---
Well this should not be blocking.
If we need to split in future, we can by changing the top level package to one
that requires the sub packages.
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678
Bug 1017678 depends on bug 1017645, which changed state.
Bug 1017645 Summary: Review Request: hibernate-search - Hibernate Search
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017645
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Blocks|652183 (FE-J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
--- Comment #14 from Vladan Popovic ---
I haven't tested it on f20, wasn't sure if I should put it. Thanks Jon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020844
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020404
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020844
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
I added f20, no worries.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019428
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018862
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018862
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lis
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo