https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Michele Baldessari from comment #6)
> So I went through an iteration of fedora-review -b 1025977 and fixed
> a couple of things. New files:
>
> Spec URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977128
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> Jamie, where are you?
Sorry, have been so busy over the last few weeks, but I have some time over the
next week. I'll work on this soon :)
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977128
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/grunt/nodejs-grunt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/grunt/SRPMS/nodejs-grunt-0.4.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
* Sun Nov 03 2013 Jamie Nguyen - 0.4.1-2
- im
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977128
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015261
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025930
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pwout...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025984
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025972
Jose Pedro Oliveira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025972
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
> Have you seen bug 990423?
Unfortunately, your ticket doesn't appear in
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html because you have too many
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009750
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||Ready
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
ping.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026095
Bug ID: 1026095
Summary: Review Request: doclifter - Translates documents
written in troff macros to DocBook
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026095
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||doclifter
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895541
--- Comment #47 from RudraB ---
Hi Antonio,
Sorry for the delayed reply. Since this is my first package, my sponsor asked
me to have mastered the procedure, which was tricky for me. so, I will probably
remain upstream, and if some one find this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895541
--- Comment #48 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to RudraB from comment #47)
> Hi Antonio,
> Sorry for the delayed reply. Since this is my first package, my sponsor
> asked me to have mastered the procedure, which was tricky for me. so, I will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895541
RudraB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018540
Bug 1018540 depends on bug 1018057, which changed state.
Bug 1018057 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-goprotobuf - Go support
for Google protocol buffers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
--- Comment #13 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #12)
> ping.
the package works, and it would make sense to release (approve) it as is. Of
course, some more work would be needed to make it perfect. But, it also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018533
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|golang-github-coreos-go-sys |golang-github-coreos-go-sys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018542
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab |go-bindata-0-0.4.git79847ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878556
Jan Klepek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kle...@gmail.com
Flags|fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026042
Michele Baldessari changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(conscioususer@gma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
Jan Klepek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026042
Conscious User changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(conscioususer@gma |
|il.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015261
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025928
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025930
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026052
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025984
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ken Drey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025103
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025103
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-bourne-1.5.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-bourne-1.5.0-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026095
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026095
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
Requires
doclifter (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/env
/usr/bin/python
Well, I think you should patch env path to %{__python2}.
Others are fine.
Once fixed I will approve.
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972431
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng ---
I think all issues are fixed, time to approve.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026139
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1026118
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026139
Bug ID: 1026139
Summary: Review Request: appstream - Utilities to generate,
maintain and access the AppStream Xapian database
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026139
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||appstream
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter ---
Easiest proof would be to do a rawhide koji scratch build.
While we're at it, why isn't lpf in f20 yet?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026052
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtas...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783016
--- Comment #30 from Andres Pascasio ---
New Spec URL: http://morpheusv.fedorapeople.org/pilas/0.80-6/pilas.spec
SRPM URL:
http://morpheusv.fedorapeople.org/pilas/0.80-6/pilas-0.80-6.fc18.src.rpm
These are the outputs:
rpmlint SPECS/pilas.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
I'm not sure if it's the problem of mirrors, but mock can't find blosc now with
Error: No Package found for blosc-devel although it's already imported.
I will re run the review later, please wait.
Tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026139
T.C. Hollingsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
--- Comment #11 from Alec Leamas ---
I've postponed all lpf pushes: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #10)
Welcome onboard!
> Easiest proof would be to do a rawhide koji scratch build.
Indeed: http:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972431
--- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14)
> I think all issues are fixed, time to approve.
There still are arch/multilib-related issues. Try building the srpm for i386
and x86_64, unpackage the res
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026139
--- Comment #1 from T.C. Hollingsworth ---
Looks good overall, just a couple directory issues, at least one of which isn't
your issue at all...
--
MUST:
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[!]: Package must own all
51 matches
Mail list logo
