https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994474
--- Comment #23 from Marcel Haerry ---
Doh, good catch. I misunderstood the multi-python guidelines in the wiki. Moved
it down to the python3 section and it looks better now:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6192319
Also upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
Bug ID: 1031527
Summary: Review Request: datefudge - fakes the system date/time
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030734
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
First, do you want to support EL5?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027521
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
For 0.5.0-1
* Licensing
- Currently I cannot find out where "and BSD" comes from.
Reading README.creole, it seems that the license tag should
be "Ruby". Would you check this?
Other things seems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031531
Bug ID: 1031531
Summary: Review Request: ghc-scotty - Haskell web framework
inspired by Ruby's Sinatra, using WAI and Warp
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031531
Ricky Elrod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||Ready
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005490
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|CANTFIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
Hello,
I really don't know. Is there a reason for not supporting it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031019
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Nope. Even python-boto have command line interface to Glacier. But it is very
simple. Glacier-cli is much better and user friendly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028168
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Well, before review this, I cannot find out any text files or so which suggests
the license of this gem. Would you tell me how you knew this is under MIT?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679
--- Comment #34 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #33)
> No other package has picked up compat-SFML16-devel as BuildRequires yet.
> Only two builds use SFML 1.6 at RPM Fusion, both maintained by the same
> person
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005490
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
New Spec URL: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/SDL2_mixer.spec
new SRPM URL:
http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/SDL2_mixer-2.0.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
Please review..
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
Blocks|1778
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
Blocks|17784
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910154
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng ---
Sounds like this package should be named nodejs-buddycloud-http-api.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008787
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen ---
> Thanks! Good catch - cblrpm is supposed to pick up that rpath
> but it seems Cabal is not presenting it for some reason
BTW I just tested cblrpm in F20 and that does pull in chrpath
so I guess this iss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031342
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005490
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005490
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679
--- Comment #35 from Michael Schwendt ---
$ rpmls -p SFML-devel-2.0-5.fc20.x86_64.rpm |grep -i cmake
drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/cmake/SFML
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/cmake/SFML/FindSFML.cmake
As per comment 28, comment 29 and comment 31, that is the w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|leamas.a...@gmail.com, |nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
Bug ID: 1031587
Summary: Review Request: tharlon-fonts - The Myanmar font which
is designed by Ngwe Tun
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031588
Bug ID: 1031588
Summary: Review Request: phetsarath-fonts - The font for the
Lao language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031588
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569
Stanislav Ochotnicky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||socho...@redhat.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024885
Kashyap Chamarthy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #19 from Kashyap Cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
Bug ID: 1031603
Summary: Review Request: tuladha-jejeg-fonts - Unicode font for
Javanese script
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #2)
> Hello,
> I really don't know. Is there a reason for not supporting it?
I don't know, but if you don't want to support EL5, you need to remove so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851810
Thomas Sailer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #4 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
I have no particular reason to support EL5, so indeed I should drop anything
unneeded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
--- Comment #2 from Parag ---
Just to note here about fonts: The upstream which are older (not new releases)
are not following the correct way of releasing fonts like
provide source with binary font
provide separate license file and some docs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
--- Comment #3 from Parag ---
Spec URL:
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/tuladha-jejeg-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/tuladha-jejeg-fonts-2.01-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030154
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #1)
> Could be the reason that the tests fail. I don't know if it is possible to
> create a temporary FUSE filesystem on a Koji server, Root privileges are
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031400
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
I think you have to drop the "Requires; php-symfony2-intl".
As this package is BuildRequired by main symfony package.
As this package is not designed to be usable directly , but only used through
sympfony2/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Ok.
So:
1. Remove these:
BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install
Whole %clean
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
2. URL better use PTS pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679
--- Comment #36 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #35)
> $ rpmls -p SFML-devel-2.0-5.fc20.x86_64.rpm |grep -i cmake
> drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/cmake/SFML
> -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/cmake/SFML/FindSFML.cmake
>
> As p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983608
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Would you like to use daily snapshot for instance:
https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/gpaw-0.9.1.10814.tar.gz
as source0?
And can you check the patchs if they've been merged into upstream?
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031019
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Please escape:
glacier-cli.src:12: W: macro-in-comment %{githash}
glacier-cli.src:12: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
glacier-cli.src:12: W: macro-in-comment %{githash}
2. env stuffs:
Requires
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
--- Comment #2 from Parag ---
Generally when I see license information is included in font file itself
and/then in addition to that if upstream says font is in particular license, I
see that as a valid packaging.
Here as I see upstream provid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
--- Comment #25 from Matthias Runge ---
Thank you for the review!
Changed as proposed.
Updated
SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-flake8-2.0-4.fc20.src.rpm
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-flake8.spec
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #14 from Remi Collet ---
Typo:
-Requires: php-pear(pear.swiftmailer.org/Swift) > %{swift_max_ver}
+Requires: php-pear(pear.swiftmailer.org/Swift) < %{swift_max_ver}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #15 from Remi Collet ---
Tips for phpunit option (I discover this recently, often simpler)
Instead of
-d include_path="./src:%{_datadir}/php:%{pear_phpdir}" \
Use
--include-path=./src \
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #16 from Remi Collet ---
Perhaps you should also Obsoletes php-channel-symfony2 from php-symfony2-common
(as this package have probably no reason to be kept)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #26 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978723
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978723
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005459
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005459
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006114
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006114
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008787
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008787
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #6 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
Thanks. It's now updated based on your comments. I've uploaded a -2 version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027503
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027503
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030710
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030710
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030734
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030734
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031078
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031078
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031250
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031250
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031326
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031326
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #27 from Matt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
Please paste the new URL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
--- Comment #28 from Matěj Cepl ---
damn, mid-air collision ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Parag ---
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
Parag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Parag ---
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031527
--- Comment #8 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7)
> Please paste the new URL.
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/datefudge.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng ---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/herbstluftwm.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/herbstluftwm-0.5.2-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute ---
(In reply to Stanislav Ochotnicky from comment #1)
> Next time please use review template[1] for creating package review bugs.
> For now you should add missing information
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
--- Comment #5 from Parag ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tharlon-fonts
Short Description: The Myanmar font which is designed by Ngwe Tun
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
--- Comment #6 from Parag ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tuladha-jejeg-fonts
Short Description: Unicode font for Javanese script
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026337
--- Comment #23 from Kaleb KEITHLEY ---
update to RC5
new files at
Spec URL: http://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/update-10/nfs-ganesha.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/update-10/nfs-ganesha-2.0.0-0.rc5.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031569
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
> %build
> echo "Nothing to do in Build."
>
> ???
>
> This is fantastic but I think you don't have to echo it, just leaving
> comments there is enough.
Su
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521
--- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel ---
* Package named correctly
* Latest stable version used
* Package licensed correctly
* License tag correct
* SPEC file mostly clean and legible (see below)
* Correct compiler flags used
* Correct make flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #18 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 825643
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=825643&action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #19 from Remi Collet ---
Update from installed packages (pear ones) to new packages => ok.
PHPUnit still works (despite pear metadata are now inconsistent)
Packages which requires another php-symfony2-* don't need to requires -co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010383
--- Comment #4 from Pete MacKinnon ---
Updated with fpc-requested virtual provides:
SPEC URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/time-api/time-api.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/time-api/time-api-0.6.4-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997679
--- Comment #37 from Michael Schwendt ---
%_libdir/cmake/ is for project/package ConfigMake files, whereas SFML only
ships a Find*.cmake file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031603
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031587
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
