https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|cicku...@gmail.com |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036297
--- Comment #14 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Created attachment 836146
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=836146&action=edit
Use pkgdocdir and sed for build the package
there aren't any special reason on our guidelines for avo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|php-sy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028817
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||python-pysmell-0.7.3-2.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033037
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985446
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
--- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System ---
lcmaps-1.6.1-7.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
--- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System ---
lcmaps-1.6.1-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
--- Comment #2 from Steven Dake ---
Jamie,
Thanks for the great constructive review comments. I have made the suggested
improvements, minus putting the openshift-origin and openshift-enterprise
templates in a separate package. I don't think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858078
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Noffke ---
I'd like to help with this, but I'm not familiar with your process for
reviewing or testing source RPMs. Can you please refer me to some instructions
on how to do this?
I'm on Fedora 19 -- would I need t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021160
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
doge-2.2.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/doge-2.2.0-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
--- Comment #4 from Adrien Devresse ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: gfal2-util
Short Description: GFAL2 utility tools
Owners: adev
Branches: f18 f19 f20 el6 el5
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
--- Comment #25 from Luis Pabon ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #22)
> more:
> please adapt to the following:
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
>
> and
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
--- Comment #26 from Luis Pabon ---
Thank you all for your comments. I didn't even know about the %exclude macro,
that makes things a _lot_ easier.
Please take a look at the new updated spec file:
SPEC URL:
https://raw.github.com/lpabon/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858065
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtfeedback/mingw-qt5-qtfeedback.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtfeedback/5.0.0/0.6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858062
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt/mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt/5.2.0/0.1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858085
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtxmlpatterns/mingw-qt5-qtxmlpatterns.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtxmlpatterns/5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858078
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtsvg/mingw-qt5-qtsvg.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtsvg/5.2.0/0.1.rc1.fc21/src/mi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858063
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity/mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtconnectivit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858073
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtpim/mingw-qt5-qtpim.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtpim/5.0.0/0.6.git20130510.935
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084
--- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/5.2.0/0.1.rc1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858070
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia/mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia/5.2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
--- Comment #24 from Luis Pabon ---
(In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #23)
> I can't see any senseful movement here, unfortunately. :(
>
> Now there is a tarball on Canonical's launchpad, but I still can't determine
> where it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #20 from Erik Schilling ---
New release:
- New upstream release 1.1.1
Updated SPEC: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/qbs.spec
New SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/qbs-1.1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
New koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008057
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from David
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #19 from David K
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036297
--- Comment #13 from Edwind Richzendy Contreras Soto ---
Compatible with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
Spec URL: http://repo.richzendy.org/turpial/python-libturpial.spec
RPM URL:
http://repo.richzendy.org/turpial/py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985446
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #8 from David King ---
I ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Jon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040243
--- Comment #1 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Spec URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/capnproto_rpm_v2/capnproto-c++.spec
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/capnproto_rpm_v2/capnproto-c++-0.4.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
As promised, here's a re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #17 from David King ---
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Ok, that looks better. Can you point me to one more practice review? The one
for python-musicbrainzngs was OK, maybe something that might be more complex?
Though that's hard to assess before you start, bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008057
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
Flags|fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@mit.edu,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041924
Bug ID: 1041924
Summary: Review Request: fish - Friendly Interactive Shell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021160
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
doge-2.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/doge-2.2.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021160
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
doge-2.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/doge-2.2.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #15 from David King ---
Thanks for the review, Jon!
I was building for F20, and so didn't notice the problem when building for
Rawhide. I avoided the BuildRequires by refreshing the patch and passing
"--disable-maintainer-mode" to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
ISSUES:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)". Detailed output of licens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Also, you should BuildRequires: systemd, not -devel.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040767
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ---
One other thing: please adjust the package to have the date in the Release tag.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
It should be:
Release:1.20131212git%{short
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
BuildRequires:maven-compiler-plugin
BuildRequires:maven-jar-plugin
BuildRequires:maven-javadoc-plugin
are unnecessary, should be already required by our java's tools
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040767
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ken D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Packages_providing_APIs
please, add directory %{_javadir}/javax.servlet.jsp, and
add Provides: javax.servlet.jsp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Ignore previous comment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008057
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amigad...@amigadave.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
Kamil Páral changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kpa...@redhat.com
Blocks|9806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
- rpmlint checks return:
gnome-logs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) systemd -> systems, system,
system d
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
gnome-logs.x86_64: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
--- Comment #11 from David King ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #10)
> Posted spec and SRPM spec differ:
>
> Please post consistent versions for clarity.
Sorry about that, I have updated the spec now.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gridftp-driver-1.2-2.el5
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027784
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991621
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #3 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I've raised Release and put the new files here:
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia.spec
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia-0.2.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040027
--- Comment #5 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
OK, new version is at:
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/double-conversion.spec
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/double-conversion-2.0.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038128
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1041430 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1041457
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041435
Bug ID: 1041435
Summary: Review Request: jboss-jsp-2.3-api - JavaServer Pages
2.3 API (JSP)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825495
--- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch ---
The core of RoR consist of 8 packages. However, these packages has another
dependencies and enforces their specific versions. You can start with RDoc,
continue with minitest, sprockets, etc.
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040027
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski ---
Great, but please bump the release and add a changelog entry, even during the
review process. It helps keeping track of changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028165
--- Comment #3 from Adrien Devresse ---
Review and good one :
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Contains file under BSD li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040459
Simon Farnsworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||si...@farnz.org.uk
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825495
--- Comment #6 from Adam Tkac ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #5)
> Nobody bans Redmine. We only lack the menpower. We are speaking here about
> up to 50+- packages which needs to be maintained.
If I understand correctly, maintaining
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825495
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
Nobody bans Redmine. We only lack the menpower. We are speaking here about up
to 50+- packages which needs to be maintained.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413
Bart Verwilst changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@verwilst.be
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Matt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517
--- Comment #2 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Thanks for the reply. I've updated the files linked above with a revised .spec
and .src.rpm.
I have renamed julia to julia-base and made julia a metapackage depending on
julia-base and julia-doc, to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036130
--- Comment #6 from Devrim GÜNDÜZ ---
Hi,
I can sponsor this package. Here is a quick review:
* Deps are defined fine
* Builds on my Fedora 19 machine
* Please remove 2nd %changelog parameter
* Please fix summary -- I don't think it belongs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rspec-longrun-0.1.2-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027383
--- Comment #2 from Adrien Devresse ---
Hi Mattias,
New version with all reported problems corrected :
Spec URL:
http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/dms/lcgutil/reviews/gfal2-util.spec
SRPM URL:
http://grid-deployment.web.cer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825495
Adam Tkac changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||von...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Adam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003322
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027288
--- Comment #6 from Adrien Devresse ---
Not in particular, it's the maintainer personnal choice I guess.
I just made a request to him to get it on f19 and rawhide too.
New version from your comments :
Spec URL:
http://grid-deployment.web.ce
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038128
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038128
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034943
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
