https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #8 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Rahul Sundaram from comment #6)
rpmlint complains about the use of macro in the changelog. so you might
want to drop % or use %%
done
license according to the README is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Rahul Sundaram from comment #7)
Also Fedora licensing guideline recommend that source files should have
copyright headers clearly stating the author and licensing detail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052427
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtar...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918578
--- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I think they can only remove themselves, but I set their commit and approveacls
states to Obsolete, which I suppose is close enough.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923831
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923831
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923831
--- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #3)
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/ipaddress
import ipaddress
ipaddress.ip_address('192.168.0.1')
Traceback (most recent call
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
--- Comment #38 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
The build in koji was successful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897
--- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro ---
I was only the reviewer of the package , please be as kind as to ask Allisson.
manuel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897
--- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I was asking Emmanuel Seyman, current owner of the package. Thanks for the
quick response though!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897
--- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #6)
Emmanuel, I need this package for EPEL-7; are you interested in packaging
for EPEL-7?
I'm not a EPEL user so I'ld rather someone else
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897
--- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I'll get the branch done and then you can give me ownership and add yourself as
co-maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011873
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051536
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002157
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051536
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051536
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002154
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051536
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002157
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
Bug ID: 1053563
Summary: Review Request: netty3 - An asynchronous event-driven
network application framework and tools for Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 850460
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=850460action=edit
phpcompatinfo.log
phpcompatinfo version 2.26.0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 850461
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=850461action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #850461|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Any comments from the Fedora maintainers?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Any comments from the Fedora maintainers?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
f21 not branched yet, devel is automatic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852623
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/d1u3vl780ovey8s/vdr-tvguide.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||BuildFails
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052060
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967659
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
$ fedora-review -b 885357
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 885357
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 885357
INFO: -- SRPM url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605
--- Comment #13 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #12)
Initial comments:
- Some 'install' commands are not performed with -p option to preserve
timestamps
should be OK now
- I don't see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995995
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
md5deep-4.3-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-4.3-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
md5deep-4.3-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-4.3-3.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231753
Jan Pradac jan.pra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.pra...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051901
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
* Bump release
- It is good habit to bump release for each review cycle. It is easier to see
changes and compare with previous version, if needed.
* Don't mark test and Rakefile by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053640
Bug ID: 1053640
Summary: Review Request: python-statsmodels - Statistics in
Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053665
Bug ID: 1053665
Summary: Review Request: perl-perlindex - Index and search the
perl documentation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005792
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051536
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544
Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.5.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1053678
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
Bug 1023848 depends on bug 1053678, which changed state.
Bug 1053678 Summary: Exception down the road when reviewing bug 1023848
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053678
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1044580
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002157
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1002155
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1002157
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
Jeff Peeler jpee...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
--- Comment #3 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
I think it shouldn't create circular dependency on uima-build-resources. That
dependency is introduced only by maven-remote-resources-plugin and it seems
irrelevant to packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-parent-pom.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-parent-pom-8-1.fc19.src.rpm
- remove uima-build-resources references
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005778
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1005779 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1005778 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
- remove uima-build-resources references
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Bug 1005782 depends on bug 1005778, which changed state.
Bug 1005778 Summary: Review Request: uima-build-resources - Apache UIMA Build
Resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005778
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1005778 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005778
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1005782 (uimaj) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005778
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package should have proper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092
--- Comment #14 from Dale Macartney dbmacart...@gmail.com ---
chmod 644 rpmbuild/SOURCES/barman* seems to resolve the rpmlint errors.
SPEC: http://dbmacartney.fedorapeople.org/barman/barman.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/simple-xml.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/simple-xml-2.7.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
- fix license field
- add javapackages-tools (provides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092
--- Comment #15 from Dale Macartney dbmacart...@gmail.com ---
Forgot change log.
[mac@rhodey ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/barman.spec
rpmbuild/SRPMS/barman-1.2.3-9.fc20.src.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/barman-1.2.3-9.fc20.noarch.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051665
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vdr-skinnopacity-1.0.3-5.20131221git0b29805.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
morfologik-stemming-1.8.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/morfologik-stemming-1.8.3-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002170
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053845
Bug ID: 1053845
Summary: Review Request: python-django-crispy-forms - Best way
to have Django DRY forms
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885394
mbeni...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mbeni...@redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605
--- Comment #14 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 850719
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=850719action=edit
Optimization flags patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
openstack-heat-templates-0-0.1.20140106git.el6 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to marcindulak from comment #13)
nwchem contains also additional packages (global arrays - i think they
distribute their own, modified version) and one would have to deal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
openstack-heat-templates-0-0.1.20140106git.fc20 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 20.
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo