https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053845
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gia...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Well.
All my patches in upstream[0][1][2], so drop it!
New SPEC: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/beignet.spec
New SRPM:
http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/beignet-0.3-8.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #17 from Micha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885394
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|177841 (F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #40 from Ser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885393
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786860
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922060
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659663
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531107
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889505
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718681
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751411
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819274
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606421
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895541
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970418
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003188
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155
--- Comment #3 from Michael Simacek ---
No, you got me wrong. By "BSD present only in tests" I meant that it is a false
positive, because the license tag should reflect contents of the binary RPM and
tests don't make it to the final RPM. (And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885390
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885392
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
--- Comment #5 from Michael Simacek ---
Created attachment 850952
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=850952&action=edit
build.log
It doesn't build for me
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048299
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akurt...@redhat.com
Bl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956147
--- Comment #20 from David Beveridge ---
Updated to Fedora 20 with many thanks for the patch from Scott Shambarger
http://repo.bevhost.com/fedora/wide-dhcpv6.spec
http://repo.bevhost.com/fedora/wide-dhcpv6-20080615-11.1.5.fc20.src.rpm
http://re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908493
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Matth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053640
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual ---
This version handles better the matplotlib based tests
Spec URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/fedora/python-statsmodels.spec
SRPM URL:
http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/fedora/python-statsmodels-0.5.0-4.fc20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Igor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753
Peter Borsa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(peter.borsa@gmail |
|.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908493
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908493
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011873
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011873
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
--- Comment #41 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051678
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051678
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053563
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049557
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019403
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
SRPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gst-editing-services/gst-editing-services-1.1.90-4.fc20.20131206git289b04f.src.rpm
SPEC:
http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gst-editing-services/gst-editing-servi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053640
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Lavoie ---
You have my vote.
I'm really interested in that package.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054269
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6414698
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054269
Bug ID: 1054269
Summary: Review Request: storaged - LVM DBus add-on for udisks
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054269
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sgall...@redhat.com
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek ---
Few issues before doing in-depth review:
- icons are licensed under BSD (according to LICENSE file) -> License should be
ASL 2.0 and BSD
- there is a NOTICE file, which could possibly affect packages lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556
--- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Build broken in rawhide, since last netty build (4.0.14) from 3 days ago, it
doesn't provide mvn(io.netty:netty) anymore. An Hadoop rebuild might be
required.
Except that, there's no other blocker in the r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1053464
--- Comment #9 from Haïkel Gu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045034
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Libosvar ---
Created attachment 851141
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=851141&action=edit
Patch for havana branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045034
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Libosvar ---
Created attachment 851142
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=851142&action=edit
Patch for icehouse branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053845
--- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple ---
No problem, I'm primarily creating this to use for epel6, but I was planning on
adding python3 support anyway to the spec down the road.
Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-django-crispy-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045034
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Libosvar ---
Created attachment 851143
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=851143&action=edit
Patch for f20 branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054269
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051678
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
glite-lb-client-java-2.0.5-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-java-2.0.5-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923831
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual ---
It seems that the upstream tarball is broken. The README file inside is missing
(broken) link. There is no license information (notice that this code was
originally under Apache License, e.g.
https://code.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051678
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
glite-lb-client-java-2.0.5-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-java-2.0.5-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051678
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396
Jakub Dorňák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Jakub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051678
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
glite-lb-client-java-2.0.5-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-java-2.0.5-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046726
--- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
Hi Christopher,
Why did you change the topic?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
says "normal review process"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-parent-pom.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-parent-pom-8-2.fc19.src.rpm
- fix build deps list
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-parent-pom.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uima-parent-pom-8-1.fc19.src.rpm
- fix build deps list
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #6)
> Few issues before doing in-depth review:
> - icons are licensed under BSD (according to LICENSE file) -> License should
> be ASL 2.0 and BSD
maybe ASL 2.0 or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6416418
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Sorry
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/simple-xml.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/simple-xml-2.7.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
- fix license field
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052393
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
beignet-0.3-8.48f8e5b.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/beignet-0.3-8.48f8e5b.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054394
Bug ID: 1054394
Summary: Review Request: python-django-admin-bootstrapped -
Bootstrap support for Django projects
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #5)
>
>
> Now review notes:
>
> Koji scratch builds used:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6390515 (Fedora 19)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
Dale Macartney changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dbmacart...@gmail.com
--- Comment #61
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556
Robert Rati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1053489
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556
Robert Rati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1049905
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Dorňák ---
Anyway, I have to wait until python3-openid review process is finished first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049557
--- Comment #6 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #5)
> Funny, I was just thinking it'd be handy to have this packaged up. I'll let
> Igor finish the official review but throw in a few comments.
>
> It's not a big
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048963
--- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev ---
I've fixed doc files and added "cronies" and "logrotate" to Requires. Thanks
for pointing that.
As for Buildroot tag, I see that format used in the spec is also permitted, so
I didn't change anything ther
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039818
Jakub Jedelsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub.jedel...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049557
--- Comment #7 from Matthew Miller ---
I must have just overlooked the libjpeg-devel. Apologies!
It all looks good to me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054269
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puiterwijk@redhat |
|.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054269
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6417339
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this produc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053665
Jakub Jedelsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub.jedel...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053665
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jedelsky ---
Maybe a little hint - this package is not so perl module as a standalone
utility so why not to call it just "perlindex"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jedelsky ---
Hi Michael,
thanks for your offer. I made two (simple) reviews. They are exactly perl and
ruby.. :)
rubygem-wikicloth: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036320
perl-perlindex: https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366121
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921286
--- Comment #4 from Juan Manuel ---
To easy maintainance this packages are being merged into one single project;
http://code.google.com/p/codemiscs .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921286
Juan Manuel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063
--- Comment #24 from Kenjiro Nakayama ---
Since I want the_silver_searcher to include in the Fedora package ASAP, I
update.
I'm sorry if I am breaking a rule.
> Henriki,
I have no intention of stealing your job. So if you want to continue, p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047608
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Ad
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo