https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000563
Bug 1000563 depends on bug 982285, which changed state.
Bug 982285 Summary: Review Request: thrift - software framework for scalable
cross-language services development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982285
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982285
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029227
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016767
Bug 1016767 depends on bug 982285, which changed state.
Bug 982285 Summary: Review Request: thrift - software framework for scalable
cross-language services development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982285
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016089
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005792
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025904
Bug 1025904 depends on bug 1005792, which changed state.
Bug 1005792 Summary: Review Request: uima-addons - Apache UIMA Addons components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005792
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004565
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016089
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|aprsdigi-3.5.1-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057496
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Thanks for the review, I prepared a new one:
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/senna.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/senna-1.1.5-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
Bug 896193 depends on bug 1017499, which changed state.
Bug 1017499 Summary: bamf-0.5 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017499
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064817
--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
The Spec and SRPM files have been updated and built on koji at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6529861
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065281
Bug ID: 1065281
Summary: Review Request: xnbd - Yet another NBD (Network Block
Device) server program
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4)
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3)
- %build section should likely use %{__perl} instead of perl
The guidelines generally
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
(In reply to David King from comment #1)
Looks great to me! 4.70.0 is the latest upstream release, is there any
chance of using that instead? I have posted a patch to update the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Bug ID: 1065301
Summary: Review Request: python3-simplepam - Pure Python
interface to the Pluggable Authentication Modules
system on Linux
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #8 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
Sorry for the long delay.
Spec URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/alef/alef-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/alef/alef-fonts-1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1065306
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
Bug ID: 1065306
Summary: Review Request: pyxtrlock - The X transparent screen
lock rewritten in Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #11 from Michael Friedrich michael.friedr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
(In reply to Michael Friedrich from comment #9)
While the transition/upgrade from 1.x to 2.x may not be the easiest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
--- Comment #1 from Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de ---
One note about the Requires: The package needs libX11, libxcb = 1.4 and
xcb-util-image (libxcb-image.so). I haven’t put these in because all the
guidelines tell me not to specify library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Leon Weber from comment #1)
One note about the Requires: The package needs libX11, libxcb = 1.4 and
xcb-util-image (libxcb-image.so). I haven’t put these in because all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
--- Comment #3 from Leon Weber l...@leonweber.de ---
Spec URL: http://feynman.q-ix.net/rpm/pyxtrlock.spec
SRPM URL: http://feynman.q-ix.net/rpm/pyxtrlock-0.2-2.fc19.src.rpm
Thanks, spec and rpm updated.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064656
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619237
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619237
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630339
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630339
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967482
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Requested package name libnatpnp doesn't match bug summary
libnatpmp, please correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Already exists, please use a Package Change Request to request a new branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046726
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(chat-to-me@raveit |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
--- Comment #27 from Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com ---
Here you go
SPEC: http://jknife.fedorapeople.org/review/plank.spec
SRPM: http://jknife.fedorapeople.org/review/plank-0.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #3)
They now work, but I get the following notice when running both binaries:
Enter an informal description between '[' and ']':
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #29 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
I decided to see what it would take to build on epel 6 so here's a new spec
with a few conditionals to make it work...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/wxGTK3/wxGTK3.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Bug ID: 1065446
Summary: Review Request: hive - Hadoop-compatible data
warehouse
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065446
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
--- Comment #8 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
I just tried to build the latest version in mock for fedora-rawhide-x86_64, and
the build failed:
File _none_, line 1:
Error: Files /usr/lib64/ocaml/oUnit/oUnit.cmxa
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064486
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047013
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042995
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
--- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name ---
Worrying when it's the unit test library that fails :p -- Cc:ing myself on that
bug, thanks.
Building against F20 should work fine, I'm using a mock build on my machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
--- Comment #10 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
This one was missed:
4) Remove the rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the top of %install.
After doing this one:
5) Don't strip the cmxs files.
we now get this output from rpmlint:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #19 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com ---
Pete / Zbigniew, what do you think of Jerry's changes? I'm kind of thinking we
should get the initial package through review as Pete's version, and then add
Jerry's enhancements in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056057
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #20 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #19)
Pete / Zbigniew, what do you think of Jerry's changes? I'm kind of thinking
we should get the initial package through review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
- To me, you should remove the line
Requires: %{name}-devel%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} and provide own
license file
for -static sub-packege.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #21 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com ---
I'm a little worried about the non-upstreamed changes, simply because I don't
have time to test them and that seems a little irresponsible. But if you all
think it's good I'm fine with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065490
Bug ID: 1065490
Summary: Review Request: perl-BSSolv - A new approach to
package dependency solving
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986641
Sébastien Willmann sebastien.willm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061902
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
qepcad-B-1.69-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qepcad-B-1.69-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crobi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: OpenCASCADE |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058019
--- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr ---
Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a new version which should fix this.
http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/utf8proc.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mingw-wavpack-4.60.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-wavpack-4.60.1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mingw-wavpack-4.60.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-wavpack-4.60.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046726
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046726
--- Comment #13 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pluma
Short Description: Text editor for the MATE desktop
Owners: raveit65 vicodan
Branches:
InitialCC:
Note: branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046726
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062920
Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
--- Comment #28 from Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com ---
Group: Applications/File
RPM groups are basically worthless, but maybe change this to
Applications/System like openstack-nova uses (though openstack-swift uses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060421
--- Comment #4 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)
Updated SPEC file http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/python-plist.spec
Updated SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060438
--- Comment #1 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
Updated SPEC file http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/python-pycalendar.spec
Updated SRPM
http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/python-pycalendar-2-0.1.20140201svn214.el7.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539
Bug ID: 1065539
Summary: Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065541
Bug ID: 1065541
Summary: Review Request: mmg3d4 - anisotropic tetrahedral
remesher / moving mesh generator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065541
Alexey Vasyukov vasyu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065542
Bug ID: 1065542
Summary: Review Request: voro++ - library for 3D computations
of the Voronoi tessellation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065542
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Vasyukov vasyu...@gmail.com ---
I have a special question for Fedora Legal. voro++ license seems to be free
(see full text below). However, I'm not sure what I should set in spec file for
such a custom license. Are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065542
Alexey Vasyukov vasyu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577
--- Comment #25 from Alexey Vasyukov vasyu...@gmail.com ---
As agreed with Mukundan (nonamedotc on FAS) I'm posting here a complete list of
current modules in contrib/ and their status. I skip the modules that should be
removed completely due
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
