https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090768
Mihkel Vain changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090759
Mihkel Vain changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090768
Bug ID: 1090768
Summary: Review Request: libdigidocpp - Library for creating
and validating BDoc and DDoc containers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090759
Mihkel Vain changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1090759
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090759
Mihkel Vain changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1054938
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090759
Bug ID: 1090759
Summary: Review Request: libdigidoc - Library for handling
digitally signed documents
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
--- Comment #7 from Tom Hughes ---
With the closure compiler fix the tests also pass (using the vendored qunit)
but they do take an hour to run on my machine!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987
Ruediger Landmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986
Ruediger Landmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033987
Bug 1033987 depends on bug 1033986, which changed state.
Bug 1033986 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable - Routine for
estimating syllable count in words
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033986
What|Remov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060436
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: ocaml-opam |Review Request: opam - A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|nee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086378
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jforr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088281
Jakub Jedelsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes ---
There's a new nodejs-closure-compiler at
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.6-2.fc20.src.rpm
that patches the code to invoke the closure-compiler wrapper instead of linking
in the j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
Bug 1090189 depends on bug 1090667, which changed state.
Bug 1090667 Summary: Exception using closure compiler via Node.js wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090667
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084942
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1090667
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
Yes I can reproduce it - it seems to be a problem with the closure-compiler
package in rawhide.
If I download the prebuilt compiler.jar for the same version from upstream and
use that then in works - it's al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079965
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-dpath-1.2-0.2.70.fc2 |python-dpath-1.2-0.2.70.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084942
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Data-Tumbler-0.005-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089949
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881589
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from gil ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071062
--- Comment #5 from Dhiru Kholia ---
Currently, I am not getting enough free time to move this forward.
Please feel free to take over this package review request. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Are you getting the same error? Or is it something on my system?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Yeah I haven't managed to get the tests to work yet - they just seem to spin
doing something indeterminate.
Not sure why the other thing is failing - it was definitely working for me as
part of the lodash-no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089962
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %global gitversion .git%{commitdate}.%{shortcommit}
> Release:1%{?gitversion}%{?dist}
%gitversion is somewhat in the wrong order:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapsho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #17 from Shawn Starr ---
Here is v1.11.1 builds, mock passes, the usual errors are noted uid/gid, funny
permissions etc..
SPEC: http://spstarr.fedorapeople.org/packages/icinga/icinga.spec
SRPM:
http://spstarr.fedorapeople.org/pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Nguyen ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: nodejs-closure-compiler
Short Description: Bindings to Google's Closure Compiler for Node.js
Owners: tomh jamielinux
Branches:
InitialCC:
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090603
Chris St. Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1090600
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090600
Chris St. Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1090603
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090603
Bug ID: 1090603
Summary: Review Request: python-mongomock - Python mock library
for PyMongo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen ---
(NB: I guess you listed f19 and f20 out of habit. closure-compiler is not yet
available for those branches.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hugh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090600
Bug ID: 1090600
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090600
Chris St. Pierre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|values for Python
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Both fixed:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.6-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090189
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084199
--- Comment #5 from Chris St. Pierre ---
The "spelling errors" are all the names of Python types. Is there some way to
tell rpmlint not to flag them as errors? 'Cause they're not. :)
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dicttoxml.py doesn't nee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090190
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
I wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087605
--- Comment #2 from David King ---
It seems like there are just a few minor dependency issues to fix.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Damia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #16 from Shawn Starr ---
1.11.1 is being packaged now instead, since you've taken most of our patches,
I'm just cleaning that up and will post for review the spec/SRPM
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090187
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090499
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt ---
Consider pointing the fedora-review tool at this ticket. Run "fedora-review -b
1090499". It evaluates the "SRPM URL:" and "Spec URL:" lines and performs many
helpful checks you ought to be interested in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089463
Jamie Nguyen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Jamie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089463
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089463
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/docco/nodejs-fs-extra.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/docco/SRPMS/nodejs-fs-extra-0.8.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
* Wed Apr 23 2014 Jamie Nguyen - 0.8.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089463
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Nguyen ---
Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/docco/nodejs-fs-extra.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/docco/SRPMS/nodejs-fs-extra-0.8.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Wed Apr 23 2014 Jamie Nguyen - 0.8.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087605
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073362
--- Comment #3 from François Cami ---
BR list fixed, thank you.
Spec URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/zathura-cb.spec
SRPM URL: http://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/zathura-cb-0.1.2-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069243
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324
Jiri Popelka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@redhat.com
Flags|needin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090501
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071653
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #9)
> I believe it's fine as it is. I believe you need an approval from the
> assigned reviewer though.
>
> Christopher: Ping? Is this one good to go?
Instead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079640
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/rubygem-json_spec-1.1.1-2/rubygem-json_spec.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/rubygem-json_spec-1.1.1-2/rubygem-json_spec-1.1.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
koj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Ant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071653
--- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel ---
I believe it's fine as it is. I believe you need an approval from the assigned
reviewer though.
Christopher: Ping? Is this one good to go?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894600
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #6)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> > Christopher,
> >
> > you already have assigned to yourself tens of (pending) package reviews
> > including
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881589
Robert Rati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Rober
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090501
Bug ID: 1090501
Summary: Review Request: getdns - Implementation of the getdns
API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090499
Bug ID: 1090499
Summary: Review Request: netresolve - Generic name resolution
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073362
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata ---
TODO: Drop the desktop-file-utils BR; you don't need it now.
You're missing some build-time dependencies which happen to be pulled in
transitively but should be added nonetheless:
girara-devel
glib2-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689
--- Comment #17 from Robert Scheck ---
According to https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/commits/master there had been
no changes since my last GIT checkout. And comment #11 is still valid IMHO.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090112
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991689
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng ---
Please update to develop branch, OK?
polarssl is unbundled in upstream.
You also need to set LDFLAGS via %?__global_ldflags
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089634
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to David Dick from comment #4)
> Hi Petr, all fixed except for removing Digest::SHA as a build-time
> dependency. It gets used in rawhide in t/bug-localize-regex-vars.t as seen
> below. It's undet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082474
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Vasi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082474
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
OK, done
http://koji.russianfedora.pro/kojifiles/work/tasks/4601/4601/gimp-wavelet-denoise-plugin-0.3.1-3.fc21.R.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
--- Comment #26 from Kenjiro Nakayama ---
(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #25)
OK! I add f19.
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: the_silver_searcher
Short Description: Super-fast text searching tool
Ow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071062
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: doomsday - |Review Request: doomsday -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
--- Comment #25 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
Please package it for f19 too, that's what I still have on my main machine,
waiting for a fix in fedup.
If you don't want to maintain the f19 branch, I will gladly.
I have no idea how to proceed now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071062
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Dhiru Kholia from comment #2)
> > Where is the devel package?
>
> I only need to tackle this one now.
I know, but you should put .so into devel, it's a MUST.
Requires: %name = %ver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
Kenjiro Nakayama changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #24 from K
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
--- Comment #23 from Kenjiro Nakayama ---
Updated
Updated Spec URL:
http://kenjiro.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/the_silver_searcher/the_silver_searcher.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://kenjiro.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/the_silver_searcher/the_sil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088283
--- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel ---
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/python-cassandra-driver.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/python-cassandra-driver-1.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089634
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from David Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089634
--- Comment #4 from David Dick ---
Hi Petr, all fixed except for removing Digest::SHA as a build-time dependency.
It gets used in rawhide in t/bug-localize-regex-vars.t as seen below. It's
undetectable as the only place it is referenced is in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065490
--- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Josef Stribny from comment #12)
> Thanks for the valuable comments, I will go through them and fix the spec.
> It's my first Perl package so I want to make it right.
>
> I have one question
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979166
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
I'd like to see the new SPEC & SRPM based on previous comments and
improvements.
BTW the URL has changed to torasql.com
Add missing hicolor-icon-theme dep.
Move %files after %post* but before %changel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=102
--- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen ---
Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-humanize/python-humanize.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-humanize/python-humanize-0.5-3.fc20.src.rpm
fixes up the duplicates also.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087988
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Emm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089653
David Dick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from David Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
Dridi Boukelmoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #22 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088281
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel ---
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/python-scales.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/python-scales-1.0.5-1.el7.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082474
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
One forgot to say:
install src/wavelet-denoise %{buildroot}$GIMP_PLUGINS_DIR/plug-ins
Use -p and -m
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082474
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201337
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065490
--- Comment #12 from Josef Stribny ---
Thanks for the valuable comments, I will go through them and fix the spec. It's
my first Perl package so I want to make it right.
I have one question:
> * MUSTFIX: Missing BRs:
> perl(Exporter)
> perl(X
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089950
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-Lock-0.05-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DB_File-Lock-0.05-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089950
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-Lock-0.05-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DB_File-Lock-0.05-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
