https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109467
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dd...@cpan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #2 from Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com ---
SPEC file: http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/esteidpkcs11loader.spec
SRPM:
http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/esteidpkcs11loader-3.8.0.1052-2.fc20.src.rpm
(In reply to František
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=157
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108381
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||474818
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108381
Bug 1108381 depends on bug 446, which changed state.
Bug 446 Summary: Please build this package for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1108381
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098778
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Redis-1.974-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Redis-1.974-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109467
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dd...@cpan.org) |
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110749
--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Fixed and uploaded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094289
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106364
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MooX-Types-MooseLike-Numeric-1.02-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106364
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109491
--- Comment #12 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/liblbfgs.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/liblbfgs-1.10-3.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Jun 20 2014 Sandro Mani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #19 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
This looks much better, thanks.
One more thing. I see that a 2MB PDF manual file is available at
http://wias-berlin.de/software/tetgen/#Documentation
Don't you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #14)
Scratch that.
With the
%files devel
%{_pkgdocdir}/
change, both libdatrie and libdatrie-devel hold all doc files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #20 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Yes good idea!
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/tetgen.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/tetgen-1.5.0-3.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Jun 20 2014 Sandro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #22 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
example.poly can indeed go into -doc, but I'd keep readme in the main package,
given its contents.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #23 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
SPEC and SRPM updated (no release bump).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061056
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
cockpit-0.11-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cockpit-0.11-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The files were sub-packaged from perl.spec in perl-5.18.2-300.fc21.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360
--- Comment #3 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 910723
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=910723action=edit
licensecheck.txt from fedora-review
I attached the licensecheck for your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108828
Bug 1108828 depends on bug 1108808, which changed state.
Bug 1108808 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kconfigwidgets - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier
3 addon for creating configuration dialogs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108817
Bug 1108817 depends on bug 1108808, which changed state.
Bug 1108808 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kconfigwidgets - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier
3 addon for creating configuration dialogs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824
Bug 1108824 depends on bug 1108808, which changed state.
Bug 1108808 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kconfigwidgets - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier
3 addon for creating configuration dialogs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827
Bug 1108827 depends on bug 1108808, which changed state.
Bug 1108808 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kconfigwidgets - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier
3 addon for creating configuration dialogs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108808
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
Bug 1108810 depends on bug 1108808, which changed state.
Bug 1108808 Summary: Review Request: kf5-kconfigwidgets - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier
3 addon for creating configuration dialogs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360
--- Comment #4 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
License issue filed upstream as https://github.com/jenisys/parse_type/issues/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360
Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541
Bug ID: 541
Summary: Review Request: ansifilter - ANSI terminal escape code
converter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591150
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591150
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kalevlem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109555
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #76 from Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com ---
(In reply to Jeffrey C. Ollie from comment #75)
Any updates on this package? This needs to be accepted into Fedora before
I'll even consider updating the Asterisk package to v12.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #30 from Michael Friedrich michael.friedr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Shawn Starr from comment #29)
as for: - Could upstream be notified for the config.guess / config.sub
issue ( so we can drop the explicit requires on libtool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
Bug ID: 561
Summary: Review Request: git-remote-hg - mercurial wrapper for
git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #2 from Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com ---
What do you mean? There's 'BuildArch: noarch' in the spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110749
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #4 from Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com ---
All corrected. Thank you for your review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110749
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #5 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096138
Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103927
Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #7 from Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Florian der-flo Lehner from comment #5)
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
I don't think that's appropriate here, given that we only install 3 files (and
build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Florian der-flo Lehner from comment #5)
Stop leaving any review template if this bug is already assigned to someone(and
being reviewed).
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #9 from Nathaniel McCallum npmccal...@redhat.com ---
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109491
Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #9 from Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com ---
All fixed now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||483663
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109491
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
Bug ID: 602
Summary: Review Request: dhex - Ncurses based hexadecimal
editor with a diff mode
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #11 from Nathaniel McCallum npmccal...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-yubico
Short Description: Pure-python library for interacting with Yubikeys
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #12 from Nathaniel McCallum npmccal...@redhat.com ---
Strangely, I don't see the fedora-cvs flag. Anyone know how to set it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334
Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #11 from Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com ---
1. Your hack is pointless, as now the interpreter is %{__python2}.
Are you sure? The substitution is ok when I extract the rpm.
2. Missing hg-git test, please BR hg-git packaged by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
if you mark it as noarch, no need to write:
%global debug_package %{nil}
in the spec.
Wrong.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo#Missing_debuginfo_packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062623
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.6.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.6.2-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062623
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #13 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Ondrej Oprala from comment #11)
1. Your hack is pointless, as now the interpreter is %{__python2}.
Are you sure? The substitution is ok when I extract the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #14 from Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com ---
You will need to add `BuildRequires: python2-devel` to have that macro
correctly expanded inside the mock-chroot. ;)
Aah, thanks for the tip :)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Forget 4:
Makefile contains strip, this is not allowed, the debug info package will be
useless. Please patch it off.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #3 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
(In reply to Mihkel Vain from comment #2)
Version that is now in Fedora repos is based on old codebase. It was
developed by another company, but due to some confusion, contract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634
Bug ID: 634
Summary: Review Request: git-remote-bzr - bazaar wrapper for
git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
I still don't understand why I'm wrong here.
BuildArch: noarch _implicitly_ disables generation of -debuginfo packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #18 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #17)
I still don't understand why I'm wrong here.
BuildArch: noarch _implicitly_ disables generation of -debuginfo packages.
Ondrej wrote
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
Thanks for the review.
1. LDFLAGS need be to set with %{?__global_ldflags}
This makes sense, but needs to be documentend in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Yeah, sorry, a proper %changelog entry would have helped here to understand
what has been changed since the initial spec file. I misread the no need to
write in your comment 3 as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103927
Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302
--- Comment #77 from Jared Smith jsmith.fed...@gmail.com ---
OK, I've updated my package for the new 2.2.1 release. Upstream still hasn't
fixed the FSF address, so we're still carrying around a 500k patch just to
correct that. Nothing has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103927
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ fedora-cvs? |fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103927
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Confirmed, 32bits doesn't work as well...
I first thought it was caused by some rpath issues, but seems that's not the
right clue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673
Bug ID: 673
Summary: Review Request: kdelibs-webkit - KDE WebKit support
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634
Ondrej Oprala oopr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124
--- Comment #48 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com ---
SPEC: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/qbs.spec
SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/qbs-1.2.1-3.fc20.src.rpm
- Fixed file ownership of the doc package
- Removed accidently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1092693
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012392
Japheth Cleaver cleaver-red...@terabithia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103545
--- Comment #5 from Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com ---
So looking at it, it is a partial translation. To get the language into Fedora
it would require putting in a translation request, which I do not know Rusyn so
I would not be able to help
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103927
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
Bug ID: 689
Summary: Review Request: python3-dugong - Python 3.x HTTP 1.1
client module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1107269
Referenced
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
