https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121924
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1123583
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1121924
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #8 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
Petr,
Do we still have any updated guidelines for having all the BuildRequires
specified in perl module specs? I see some of you are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123268
--- Comment #9 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
So according to the guidelines i should have approved the review, given that
the wording is recommended not mandatory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123583
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116071
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116071
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1123616
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087855
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Updated; Swap with bug 1122332.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994474
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mh+fed...@scrit.ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003996
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121580
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122332
Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@kupo.se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122332
--- Comment #1 from Johan Swensson k...@kupo.se ---
Some initial comments, package does not build on all archs in rawhide[0] and
%{?_smp_mflags} macro is not used.
[0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7200287
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122332
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693137
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
My initial thpought was to bring the whole FENiCS into Fedora Sci.
I will see what I can do in a few days.
And, I need to talk with the submitter first in fact...
Thanks!
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #4 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #3)
Maybe it is not needed to instal it, or alternativelly you can use GPLv2
license for the -example subpackage? In eihter way, you can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123645
Bug ID: 1123645
Summary: Review Request: mingw-libgee - GObject collection
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123645
Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110386
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4)
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #3)
Maybe it is not needed to instal it, or alternativelly you can use GPLv2
license for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951496
Bug 951496 depends on bug 1048570, which changed state.
Bug 1048570 Summary: lensfun-0.2.8 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048570
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088645
Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121580
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086406
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Hi David.
There is not any License file packaged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076976
--- Comment #3 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/rubygem-settingslogic-2.0.9-2b/rubygem-settingslogic.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511
--- Comment #3 from Japheth Cleaver cleaver-red...@terabithia.org ---
Thanks for the comments. Some responses:
- I'd like to keep the EL builds a possibility, definitely.
- config line updated to use that macro pattern, thanks
- turns out the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123654
Bug ID: 1123654
Summary: Review Request: smemstat - shared memory usage
monitoring tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121085
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #6 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #1)
If your potential sponsor won't be available for awhile, I can fill in.
Could you do that? Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5)
I notice that the RPM tries to use the user dlove.
It would be similar with your own src.rpm packages, because it's entirely
normal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Docs Contact|sergio.pa...@gmail.com |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
There is a problem with the ioflo script in /usr/bin. Both python3-ioflo and
python-ioflo install ioflo in /usr/bin, but is the python2 version what appears
in both packages. That
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107800
--- Comment #3 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #2)
The spec in the url is different from the src.rpm. Please sync up.
Sorry, I'd forgotten to update this after I got fedorapeople space.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123680
Bug ID: 1123680
Summary: Review Request: python-keystonemiddleware - Middleware
for OpenStack Identity
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116238
--- Comment #14 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Steve Linabery from comment #13)
New review request for openstack-tempest package using subpackage approach:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122996
Could've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103875
Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Bug ID: 1123689
Summary: Review Request: yadifa - Lightweight authoritative
Name Server with DNSSEC capabilities
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
--- Comment #1 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Note: rpmlint reports an error E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/sbin/yadifad
caused by missing `initgroups` or `setgroups` call in function in
`sbin/yadifad/main.c` file:
static void
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123690
Bug ID: 1123690
Summary: Review Request: httraqt - HTTrack Qt GUI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123690
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123689
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121580
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116552
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@fateyev.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116552
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123654
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328
--- Comment #6 from Erik Johnson e...@saltstack.com ---
The link you posted is unclear. What is the resolution for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114187
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116487
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119243
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120791
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977646
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|mylvmbackup-0.15-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120447
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|tiptop-2.2-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328
--- Comment #7 from Erik Johnson e...@saltstack.com ---
Also, those files with /usr/bin/env at the top are test scripts designed to be
run from the command line, I believe.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
Jamie Lennox jlen...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
--- Comment #26 from Jamie Lennox jlen...@redhat.com ---
I'm sorry that this bug has sat idle so long, particularly as it's starting to
acquire blocks.
I've decided to submit this for review without checks. There are simply too
many problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755
Jamie Lennox jlen...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121580
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
Nope.
My site is always up but this one needs a tweak.
Then fix it ASAP, better RSN!
ATM your site is still inaccessible (404)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079733
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079745
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121580
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
Nope.
My site is always up but this one needs a tweak.
Then fix it ASAP, better RSN!
62 matches
Mail list logo