https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532819
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208830
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208838
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System ---
copyq-2.4.6-5.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/copyq-2.4.6-5.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079064
--- Comment #16 from Dennis Payne ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dulsi/btbuilder/master/btbuilder.spec
SRPM URL: http://identicalsoftware.com/btbuilder/btbuilder-0.5.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
Updating to the new btbuilder release. No
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212148
--- Comment #14 from Alan Pevec ---
> Most comments are addressed, except:
> - No conditionals for RHEL 7, to be implemented when needed
It is needed yesterday, I'm now using draft spec for CentOS CloudSIG builds.
While conditionals might n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment #6 is|1 |0
private|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
jbosh-0.8.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosh-0.8.0-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer ---
For F22
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9620865
For Rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9620861
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
jbosh-0.8.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosh-0.8.0-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer ---
Scratch build :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9620594
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
Bug ID: 1217857
Summary: Review Request: bandit - A framework for performing
security analysis of Python source code
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177451
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9618725
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from gil ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199738
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
Alec Leamas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Alec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
--- Comment #6 from Alec Leamas ---
Fair enough.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into bin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #4)
> Sorry for delay, have been away for a spring holiday.
>
> Basically all looks OK.
>
> The naming is a bit awkward. If the "real" jbosh which this is forked from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442
--- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas ---
Sorry for delay, have been away for a spring holiday.
Basically all looks OK.
The naming is a bit awkward. If the "real" jbosh which this is forked from ever
get packaged, this fork have acquired the gener
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215414
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980318
awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
--- Comment #9 from Mohammed Isam ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #6)
> Please read this ^. fedora-review is just a tool, and it's output should
> always be
> critically analyzed by the reviewer, not taken as authorit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201028
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/twitter/twitter-util.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gil.fedorapeople.org/twitter/twitter-util-6.23.0-0.1.2.10.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
kde-gtk-config-5.3.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-gtk-config-5.3.0-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078371
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-jquery-2.1.3-1.fc21 |js-jquery-2.1.3-1.fc20
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078368
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-jquery-2.1.3-1.fc21 |js-jquery-2.1.3-1.fc20
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212399
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124111
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215807
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078371
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-jquery-2.1.3-1.el7 |js-jquery-2.1.3-1.fc21
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078368
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-jquery-2.1.3-1.el7 |js-jquery-2.1.3-1.fc21
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210252
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
gtimelog-0.9.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210252
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
gtimelog-0.9.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214840
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215150
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner ---
Could you be more specific in the spec file about upstream? There are at least
two forks at github. But I guess real upstream development is done here:
https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/pathlib/
> The mainten
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
--- Comment #5 from Mo Morsi ---
Updated. Don't worry about it Nitesh Vit/I have this one.
Spec: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/rubygem-websocket.spec
SRPM:
https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/rubygem-websocket-1.2.2-2.fc21.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
ardour4-4.0.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ardour4-4.0.0-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
ardour4-4.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ardour4-4.0.0-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Rex Diet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215732
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I think you missed those comments:
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626605
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626605
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626605
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #25 from Paul W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Thanks. Btw, Since last few days fedora-review and dnf is giving me problem
which is taking some time to review your packages. Just installed new mock
package from f22 testing repo and still some issues w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
It turns out that lazbuild needs a bugfix to get some doublecmd build success.
> Lazarus 1.4 has a bug in lazbuild utility. I wrote about it to Lazarus
> bugtracker and it was fixed (revisions 48892,4889
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055
--- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen ---
Thanks for the review!
I'll make a couple of changes to fix the remaining issues:
(In reply to Brendan Jones from comment #6)
[...]
> Issues:
> ===
> - Static libraries in -static or -devel subpack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #8)
> We package per family fonts. See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming page. So all
> other fonts need to be packaged as separa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #5)
> Many times upstream developers of fonts do not update meta information like
> version number, License url, Copyright etc. in fonts also not release
> v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1015868
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||984560
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
tbb is in RHEL as of 6.4.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129
--- Comment #45 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
Would you mind to build with Qt5? Well, upstream suggests PyQt4 as a
dependency, maybe it buikds also with PyQt5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215150
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
bug 984560 buildrequires and requires bug 1015868 - that's the dependency!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FutureFeature
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|984560 |
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(yajo@gmail.co
75 matches
Mail list logo
