https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #31 from Andrew Niemantsverdriet andrewniema...@gmail.com ---
I have added the BuildRequire of systemd-units which should fix that failure:
The updated files are located here:
SPEC URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~kaptk2/burp.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #32 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BuildFails |
--- Comment #33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218090
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rc-1.7.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rc-1.7.3-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rc-1.7.3-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rc-1.7.3-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rc-1.7.3-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rc-1.7.3-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ceres-solver-1.10.0-5.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ceres-solver-1.10.0-5.el7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ceres-solver-1.10.0-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ceres-solver-1.10.0-5.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #6 from Toby Goodwin t...@paccrat.org ---
That's fantastic news! Thanks for your input everyone.
Robert, did you get a chance to update for the new release? It fixes that odd
autoreconf issue, and also incorporates the patch.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Ok, will do the upgrade on import.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200115
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200115
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/libphonenumber.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/libphonenumber-7.0.5-2.fc20.src.rpm
- fix multiarch support
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rc-1.7.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rc-1.7.3-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rc-1.7.3-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rc-1.7.3-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rc-1.7.3-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rc-1.7.3-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193923
--- Comment #6 from Morten Stevens mstev...@imt-systems.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5)
Here is the latest mbedtls.spec file:
https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/mbedtls/mbedtls.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218090
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218090
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 1023910
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023910action=edit
phpcompatinfo.log
phpCompatInfo version 3.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218090
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 1023911
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023911action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196780
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
Permissions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||trojita
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|trojita |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218749
--- Comment #5 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Florian der-flo Lehner from comment #1)
AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found
--
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: yast-devtools-yast-devtools-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218127
--- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
Thanks for the advice:
Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/pagure.spec
SRPM URL: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/pagure-0.1.2-2.fc21.src.rpm
Changelog:
* Sat May 09
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411
--- Comment #48 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Please look at bug #1208582 for the new review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #15 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-5.5-0.3.a.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #8 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com ---
Michael thanks for reviews. Looking at [1] it states:
These prefixes are not valid in Fedora: %license and %readme.
Looks like Fedora does not use any %license tag.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189015
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
- Please, fix non-standard-executable-perm errors.
See rpmlint output.
- libxdrfile (packaged in Fedora) is provided originally by the Gromacs
developers
under the GNU Lesser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
That's what the guidelines say :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
But that's a quite recent addition :
http://www.rpm.org/ticket/116
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218025
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218127
--- Comment #8 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
I'll fix that before import or at the next revision, thanks ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218362
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
richacl-1.5-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/richacl-1.5-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #27 from Andrew Niemantsverdriet andrewniema...@gmail.com ---
After talking with the developer 1.4.36 is going to become the new stable
version.
The updated files are located here:
SPEC URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204614
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gofed-0.0.3-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gofed-0.0.3-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204614
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gofed-0.0.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gofed-0.0.3-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196780
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: openrpt - |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196782
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
The same as in the other review: 'rm' is run at the beginning of %install, when
%buildroot is supposed to be empty.
All those empty %post section are a bit unusual, even if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186964
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021721
--- Comment #22 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204614
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gofed-0.0.3-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gofed-0.0.3-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196780
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
What about the 'rm' call at the beginning of %install? When they are called,
%{rpmbuildroot} is supposed to be empty.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196782
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: csvimp -|Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202604
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218127
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
s/per say/per se/
Don't see anything else wrong ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156967
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810376
--- Comment #22 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217857
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196782
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au ---
Spec URL: https://secure.trendhosting.net/fedora/xtuple-csvimp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://secure.trendhosting.net/fedora/xtuple-csvimp-0.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196827
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au ---
Spec URL: https://secure.trendhosting.net/fedora/fedora/postbooks.spec
SRPM URL: https://secure.trendhosting.net/fedora/postbooks-4.8.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196780
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au ---
Spec URL: https://secure.trendhosting.net/fedora/xtuple-openrpt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://secure.trendhosting.net/fedora/xtuple-openrpt-3.3.7-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218127
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196827
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au ---
Thanks all, the specs and new src RPM URLs have been added
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242537
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165895
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218089
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218089
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 1023844
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023844action=edit
phpcompatinfo.log
phpCompatInfo version 3.7.3
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218089
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 1023845
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023845action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218089
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869
--- Comment #27 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
This package makes me quite happy, because it should be another good test of
mpich and openmpi.
Without futher ado:
Please add %global _docdir_fmt %{name}. Currently
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193923
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #28 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
build fail: %{_unitdir} is not defined
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %{_unitdir}/burp.service
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
#
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #29 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9698382
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210054
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
--- Comment #30 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9698391
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
76 matches
Mail list logo