https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sgehw...@redhat.com
QA Contac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228449
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nmavr...@redhat.com
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
--- Comment #4 from Severin Gehwolf ---
This fails to build in rawhide for me, because of this:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project org.apache.felix.scr: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.scr:bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #6 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #5)
> > [!]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
>
> I have run rpmlint on the spec, rpm and srpm files. Is there is anything
> else I need to do here?;
So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #7 from Severin Gehwolf ---
This updated version is almost good to go. One significant fix has to be made.
Sorry, that I missed this earlier. Please rename the spec/package to
felix-src-maven-plugin rather than maven-src-plugin. Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224648
--- Comment #5 from Michael Mráka ---
Updated spec and srpm (dnf-plugin-spacewalk-2.4.12):
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/master/client/rhel/dnf-plugin-spacewalk/dnf-plugin-spacewalk.spec
SRPM URL:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #4)
> This fails to build in rawhide for me, because of this:
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project org.apache.felix.scr: Could not
> resolve dependencies for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
org.osgi:org.osgi.enterprise:jar:5.0.0 org.osgi:org.osgi.core:jar:5.0.0
these package does have a license
(http://www.osgi.org/Main/OSGiSpecificationLicense)
that is not allowed in Fedora because it forbids
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202337
--- Comment #4 from Zuzana Svetlikova ---
Fixed and rebuilt on f22.
Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/nodejs/nodejs-github-url-from-username-repo/nodejs-github-url-from-username-repo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220508
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220508
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220508
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|domi...@greysector.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220508
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118528
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118528
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159601
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #8 from Jie Kang ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #7)
> This updated version is almost good to go. One significant fix has to be
> made. Sorry, that I missed this earlier. Please rename the spec/package to
> felix-src-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223461
--- Comment #10 from Humble Chirammal ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #8)
> I don't see any package updated links above but I found following
>
> SPEC URL: https://humble.fedorapeople.org/python-glusterfs-api.spec
> SRPM URL:
> h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223461
--- Comment #11 from Humble Chirammal ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #9)
> package is not building as Source0: should be changed from
> Source0:
> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/python-glusterfs-api-
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #9 from Severin Gehwolf ---
%global source maven-scr-plugin
Please call this "artifactId" or some such. "source" seems too generic and is
very confusing when working with RPMs since a source is generally some tarball
or a config f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jp...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Ja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|text/x-matlab |text/plain
#1038083 mime type|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #10 from Severin Gehwolf ---
One more thing. When you change something in the spec you should bump the
release and mention in changelog what has changed. Note that there cannot be
two builds in koji with the same N-V-R (Name-Versio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231262
Bug ID: 1231262
Summary: Review Request: debbuild - Build Debian-compatible
.deb packages from RPM .spec files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175023
--- Comment #17 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #16)
> [MUSTFIX]
> It's Fedora convention to name packages after the upstream tarball's name,
> which as I understand your spec is "Oggify":
Can you please provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #11 from Jie Kang ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #9)
> %global source maven-scr-plugin
>
> Please call this "artifactId" or some such. "source" seems too generic and
> is very confusing when working with RPMs since
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202337
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #12 from Severin Gehwo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #13 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #11)
> >
> > Looks good otherwise.
>
> I have also updated the changelog as per your comment
You've updated the changelog entry and bumped release there, but not ac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199817
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Thank you, updated spec and srpm, no version bump:
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-stream-equal.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-stream-equal-0.1.5-1.fc22.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
--- Comment #14 from Jie Kang ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #11)
> > >
> > > Looks good otherwise.
> >
> > I have also updated the changelog as per your comment
>
> You've updated th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
--- Comment #7 from Jie Kang ---
I've been looking at the code that needs osgi.enterprise and it seems to be
replacable with felix.configadmin 1.8.0 similar to how osgi.core was replaced
with felix.framework 4.6.0
Fedora has felix.configadmin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175023
--- Comment #18 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #16)
> [MUSTFIX]
> Package name does not comply to Fedora package naming conventions. Please
> rename this package.
>
> It's Fedora convention to name packages aft
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175023
--- Comment #19 from Jerry James ---
Issues, in no particular order:
- I am very uncomfortable with the way the source is handled. I see the
comments above about this issue, but I still don't understand why there is a
problem with the of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228449
--- Comment #2 from Gerald Cox ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/gap-pkg-co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #43 from Mat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #44 from Matthew Miller ---
Thanks Zbigniew!
Any idea what's going on with the duplicate license thing? I'm not sure what's
causing it, since I just have '%doc README.md'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175023
--- Comment #20 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #19)
> Issues, in no particular order:
>
> - I am very uncomfortable with the way the source is handled. I see the
> comments above about this issue, but I still don
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #45 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
make install installs it:
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'.
test -z "/usr/share/doc/dateutils" || /usr/bin/mkdir -p
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dateutils-0.3.3-2.fc23.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177857
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
libsedml-0.3.0-10.20150422git235bb5.fc22 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsedml-0.3.0-10.20150422git235bb5.fc22
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228449
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jerry Jame
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228449
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> - E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/gap-pkg-congruence/GPL; there
>is a bug report on this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|sgehw...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
Eric Harney changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|sgehw...@redha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
--- Comment #8 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #7)
> I've been looking at the code that needs osgi.enterprise and it seems to be
> replacable with felix.configadmin 1.8.0 similar to how osgi.core was
> replaced with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #46 from Rüdiger Meier ---
You can just remove install it to the right location, like this:
configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}
and remove in file section use only
%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Bug ID: 1231318
Summary: Review Request: php-lightncandy - An extremely fast
PHP implementation of handlebars and mustache
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #47 from Matthew Miller ---
> and %doc implicitly adds the whole package doc dir to %files. I find this
> behaviour of %doc very annoying (and an endless source of errors).
Ugh; I thought it only did that if you specified 'doc/'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228924
--- Comment #3 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> - Almost the entire distribution is GPLv2+, but libtools/sjson.h is GPLv3+,
> which makes the binary package GPLv3+ as well.
You're correct...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228449
Gerald Cox changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Geral
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228924
--- Comment #4 from Gerald Cox ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #3)
>
> >
> > - The package uses two directories that it does not own:
> > %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0
> > %{_datadir}/gir-1.0
> > The package needs to either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231330
Bug ID: 1231330
Summary: Review Request: python-hglib - Mercurial Python
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230811
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #46 from reader_1...@hotmail.com ---
Hi,
Is this package abandoned? It would be great if you continue on packaging since
Icinga is a good monitoring software?
Thanks, regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1231311
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
LICENSE is now included in upstream master tarball, but not in a release yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378
--- Comment #47 from Shawn Starr ---
Far from it, icinga 1.x is being abandoned 2.x is being worked on, if a ticket
isn't existing I will be creating it. I'm working with upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659812
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
I'm no longer the maintainer of the package, and I don't think the current
maintainer is CC'ed (vicodan). jspaleta is a committer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199817
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199817
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
--- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Few things:
* drop the python fallback macros, we don't support anymore EL6 in RDO
* %files section for python3 subpackage is not within a conditional.
* %check section could be enabled
=> python nosetests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230811
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231351
Bug ID: 1231351
Summary: Review Request: php-cdb - CDB functions for PHP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231353
Bug ID: 1231353
Summary: Review Request: php-cssjanus - Convert CSS stylesheets
between left-to-right and right-to-left
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231354
Bug ID: 1231354
Summary: Review Request: php-oojs-ui - Object-Oriented
JavaScript – User Interface
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231355
Bug ID: 1231355
Summary: Review Request: php-StatsdClient - Object Oriented
Client for etsy/statsd written in php
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231356
Bug ID: 1231356
Summary: Review Request: php-utfnormal - Unicode normalization
functions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231355
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1230630
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231353
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1230630
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231351
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1230630
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231356
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1230630
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1230630
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231354
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1230630
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System ---
dateutils-0.3.3-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dateutils-0.3.3-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198342
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
dateutils-0.3.3-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dateutils-0.3.3-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231351
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231356
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231354
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231353
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199817
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Pio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231355
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230811
Pradeep Kilambi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Pra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230548
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge ---
- fallback macros dropped
- conditionals added to files section (and to build section)
- checks enabled
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-fasteners.spec
SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=127
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Torrie, can you fix the things from comment 4 and post an updated version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214531
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214531
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208665
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
