https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
--- Comment #18 from Rashad M ---
wait. I have some more updates. will update those same url in 1hr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hitch-1.0.0-0.4.2.beta4.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235305
Ingvar Hagelund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #22 from In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #5)
> add license file as SOURCE2,
Thanks, although upstream issue or PR would be enough.
BTW if you include some patch or LICENSE file in this case, it is good habit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249780
--- Comment #4 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Where is the license text?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249780
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Test Builds:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/monitor/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249780
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086044
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Gradina ---
Hi Vit!
Spec URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-six.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-six-0.2.0-3.fc23.src.rpm
add license file as SOURCE2, but I don't understand what did yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245255
--- Comment #6 from Jens Lody ---
Informal review:
I do not use python myself, so I'm not familiar to it.
Did you read:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python ?
If I understand correctly you should not use the generic ${python} (etc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249743
--- Comment #1 from William Moreno ---
Test builds:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/monitor/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249780
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249749
--- Comment #1 from William Moreno ---
Tests builds:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/monitor/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249786
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
Summ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246720
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1233101
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228942
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1233101 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197505
Ross Lagerwall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Ross
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219983
Steven Barre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
--- Comment #17 from Marcin Haba ---
Hello Rashad,
Thanks for preparing your new pair Spec and SRPM. URLs look also well. Thanks
for it too.
I will try to perform informal review tomorrow afternoon. Then I back here and
let you know.
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229913
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249791
Bug ID: 1249791
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-shellany - Simple, somewhat
portable command capturing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249743
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1249786
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249786
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1249780, 1249749, 1249743
Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249780
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1249786
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249749
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1249786
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249779
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249786
Bug ID: 1249786
Summary: Review Request: kaaedit- Console text editor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249780
Bug ID: 1249780
Summary: Review Request: python-curses_ex - Provide additional
curses functions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249779
Bug ID: 1249779
Summary: Review Request: python-curses_ex. - Provide additional
curses functions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
gfm-1.07-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfm-1.07-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
gfm-1.07-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfm-1.07-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249770
Bug ID: 1249770
Summary: Renaming Review Request: progress - Linux tool to show
progress for cp, rm, dd, ...
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249749
Bug ID: 1249749
Summary: Review Request: pyjf3 - Python module for Japanese
text manipulation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249748
Bug ID: 1249748
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-aws-sdk-resources - AWS SDK
for Ruby - Resources
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
Dan Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1058797 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #11 from Dan Williams ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #10)
> (In reply to Dan Williams from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #7)
> > > -> No license in %license
> >
> > Can you point me to an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249743
Bug ID: 1249743
Summary: Review Request: kaadbg - Remote debugger runner for
kaa
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #10 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
(In reply to Dan Williams from comment #8)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #7)
> > -> No license in %license
>
> Can you point me to an example? I do have "License:" entries.
In the files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Petr Schindler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pschi...@redhat.com
Whiteboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
Dan Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1058794 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #8 from Dan Williams ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #7)
> -> %{_includedir}/ndctl/*
>%{_includedir}/ndctl/
> -> %{_libdir}/*.so
>%{_libdir}/libndctl.so
> -> %{_libdir}/*.so.*
>%{_libdir}/libndctl.so.*
Fixe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249702
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko ---
-> %{_includedir}/ndctl/*
%{_includedir}/ndctl/
-> %{_libdir}/*.so
%{_libdir}/libndctl.so
-> %{_libdir}/*.so.*
%{_libdir}/libndctl.so.*
-> %doc
Still nothing in %doc.
-> No license in %license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #6 from Dan Williams ---
Created attachment 1058794
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1058794&action=edit
Updated ndctl.spec in response to comment4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #5 from Dan Williams ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #4)
> I don't think that you need separate libs subpackage.
>
> -> %{_includedir}/*
>Will own wrong directories (systemd, for example).
Changed to:
%{_includedi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249702
Simo Sorce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|puiterw...@redhat.com
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249702
Bug ID: 1249702
Summary: Review Request: custodia - A service to manage,
retrieve and store secrets.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241293
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Shaw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131731
--- Comment #15 from Shawn Iwinski ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-pimple
Short Description: A simple dependency injection container for PHP
Upstream URL: http://pimple.sensiolabs.org/
Owners: siwinski
Bra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246974
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilya.grad...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246792
--- Comment #3 from Dan Williams ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #2)
> The links are dead.
https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/releases/download/v41.git27792e104878/ndctl.spec
https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/releases/download/v41.git277
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> you should change this bug title.
This would be nice but not super-important. And the upstream
summary/description is pretty brief I must say.
* Test suite exp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208616
Timothy St. Clair changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tstclair@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246120
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1249651
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249368
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Underwood ---
Hi Scott,
OK, a few things:
1) Currently the examples directory is installed in the python site packages
directory. This stuff would probably be better installed as documentation,
unless there's a g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #2)
> Spec URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-six.spec
> SRPM URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-six-0.2.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
>
> changed description
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
--- Comment #9 from Haïkel Guémar ---
AFAIK, these pieces of code are commonly reused in many FOSS projects.
* md5.c is shipped by many packages: postgresql, cyrus-sasl, kernel, llvm
Its licensing is liberal enough to be absorbed by liberasure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Gradina ---
Spec URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-six.spec
SRPM URL: http://repo.clanwars.org/gitlab/rubygem-six-0.2.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
changed description, changed summary, add rubygem(rspec) to BRs.
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
--- Comment #16 from Rashad M ---
Spec URL:
https://git.orfeo-toolbox.org/otb-devutils.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/Packaging/fedora/SPECS/ossim.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org//srpms/ossim-1.8.18-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Stephen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #8 from Pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150445
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jama...@fc.up.pt
--- Comment #4 from Jos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241293
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Rem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249416
Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249416
--- Comment #2 from Jehan ---
Are you saying that the project is more or less abandoned? Is that the problem?
Apart from a few commits a year, I indeed don't see much activity there. But it
is based anyway on years-old code of Mozilla, which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249543
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249543
Bug ID: 1249543
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-paho-mqtt-java - MQTT client
library written in Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
You can use %{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc} at the top of the spec then
just use %license without issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
77 matches
Mail list logo
