https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252656
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-nodeenv-0.13.6-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3e186ce251
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252656
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258405
René Ribaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262642
René Ribaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262642
--- Comment #3 from René Ribaud ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-formats
Short Description: Support multiple formats with ease
Upstream URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #2 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
upstream released a new version:
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/daveo/OLA/ola.git/plain/ola.spec?id=bb5151d3c4b8c0aa11ee0cd9f436e508a1418fe0
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258405
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252803
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
alee not in packager group.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #23 from M. Scherer ---
If this is unresolved, then that shouldn't be done.
We have processes decided by community, and just acting as if they do not
matter when we are using our @redhat.com email reflect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsonld-java.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsonld-java-0.7.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
- update to 0.7.0
- removed the tests that require a web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249749
--- Comment #2 from René Ribaud ---
Hello William,
Here are the results of my first review :
1- The package is not following package naming guidelines.
Extracted from the doc : "So all python3 modules MUST have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252669
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252669
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264713
--- Comment #13 from Ilya Gradina ---
Thx Ralf,
I removed extra macros.
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/flacon/uchardet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266429
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262642
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of jsonld-java-0.7.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11292059
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267890
Bug ID: 1267890
Summary: Review Request: jsonld-java-tools - JSON-LD Java tools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759818
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Ping! Any progress?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of jsonld-java-0.7.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11292220
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263227
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263227
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228106
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý ---
(In reply to Ihar Hrachyshka from comment #3)
> /usr/share/neutron/server, /usr/share/neutron/l3_agent are owned by
> openstack-neutron dependency that we have for the package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252803
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258405
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262642
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #22 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> If you want to bundle source, shouldn't you ask first to the FPC ?
This is a long standing problem. I am trying to minimize it with better tools
and analysis of dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265885
Jackson Isaac changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211529
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211529
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264337
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1267890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267890
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1264337
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970436
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Ping! Any progress?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265885
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(michel@michel-slm |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261017
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> Please, review this before
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
> thanks in advance
I will review it. FYI: You may use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth ---
> > > * MUST: pom.xml files are not installed.
> > idem for this
I see the fedora-review check doesn't see the files have been renamed to
"opennlp.pom", etc. You may ignore this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth ---
The build completed when I built against jackcess-2.1.0 (as indicated by the
build log).
I will continue with the jackcess review of 2.1.2, but you will need to modify
this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261017
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211517
--- Comment #24 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> We have processes decided by community, and just acting as if they do not
> matter when we are using our @redhat.com email reflect very badly on the
> community, cuase it send the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth ---
@gil, I know what I'm doing. Please see the fedora-review output:
> Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> Require list are managed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261017
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Bug ID: 1268010
Summary: Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258062
Bug 1258062 depends on bug 1258056, which changed state.
Bug 1258056 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-fg-lodash - FG variant of lodash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth ---
This package (jackcess-encrypt) requires jackcess = 2.1.0 to build. If you want
to package the 2.1.2 version of jackcess this package will need to be patched
to build against it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231353
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252669
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249702
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Oh, one last thing:
Python(3)-custodia are missing deps on python-jwcrypto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
> > Sorry, this one too:
> >
> >
> > com.healthmarketscience.jackcess
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264179
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1241447 |
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-fg-lodash-0.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
If you have no plans to ship a F21 / F22 package, OK, but I imagine you will.
If the new Java package tools will not be shipped for F21/F22 you will need to
carry a if block for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #5)
> > > > * MUST: pom.xml files are not installed.
> > > idem for this
>
> I see the fedora-review check doesn't see the files have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243506
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
> Sorry, this one too:
>
>
> com.healthmarketscience.jackcess
> jackcess
> 2.1.0
>
Is not necessary, our
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267496
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of php-wikimedia-ip-set-0-0.1.20150917git.fc22.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258062
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-requestretry-1.4.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263739
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263739
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-B-Hooks-Parser-0.16-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243506
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-HL7-0.81-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252669
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pykmip-0.4.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-732ca82ad1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #4)
> The build completed when I built against jackcess-2.1.0 (as indicated by the
> build log).
>
> I will continue with the jackcess
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241447
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1235950
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261537
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
> If you have no plans to ship a F21 / F22 package, OK, but I imagine you will.
this package is only for F23 and rawhide
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
Sorry, this one too:
com.healthmarketscience.jackcess
jackcess
2.1.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249702
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266149
Roy Bekken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |23
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #10 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> Is not necessary, our java tools, does not check the required libraries
> version
I always assume to test against all Fedora versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
... and in second time to http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xmvn.git/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #20 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
susmit's scratch build of libndn-cxx-0.3.4-3.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11296174
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
NOTE: "Buildarch:noarch" should be "BuildArch:noarch"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
when i talk of "our java tools" mainly i refer to
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/javapackages-tools.git/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #21 from Susmit ---
New spec and SRPM:
http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~susmit/ndn/libndn-cxx.spec
http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~susmit/ndn/libndn-cxx-0.3.4-3.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002163
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of attributes-binder-1.2.3-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262642
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-formats-0.1.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a6bfa13ba8
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
springframework-data-redis-1.3.5-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268083
Bug ID: 1268083
Summary: Review Request: python-maxminddb - Reader for the
MaxMind DB format
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268093
Bug ID: 1268093
Summary: Review Request: python-geoip2 - MaxMind GeoIP2 API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249702
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268093
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1268090,
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo