https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354545
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #2)
I said "but the test version should be soon available at Copr [1].", please
note the *should* and *soon*. I tested with manually installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351092
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-geoip2-2.4.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
winetricks-20160709-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
nitroshare-0.3.2-6.fc24, qhttpengine-0.1.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora
24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351092
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
winetricks-20160709-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
nitroshare-0.3.2-6.fc23, qhttpengine-0.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324667
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-locket
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1.5-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
Bug ID: 1355592
Summary: Review Request: libvmi - A library for performing
virtual-machine introspection
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348775
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-unidiff-0.5.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312963
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
glibc-arm-linux-gnu-2.23-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323214
--- Comment #8 from Colin Walters ---
I'd prefer to keep %autosetup, since I always find myself adding it to packages
that don't have it the minute I do have to add patches.
Other bits in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294523
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
purple-skypeweb-1.1-11.20160620git72f0b00.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268090
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352380
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353000
Bug 1353000 depends on bug 1352996, which changed state.
Bug 1352996 Summary: Review Request: python-zipstream - ZIP archive generator
for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324667
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353389
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
We should probably run the build steps for lib/dataset.js and
release/woothee.js per the Makefile.
Also it needs a copy of the license as ASL needs to include license test for
distribution.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341641
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353389
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341641
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353382
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
There's a new (1.2.2) upstream release of this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353382
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352723
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352711
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Also you should BR npm(make-generator-function) and enable the tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352725
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274503
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642
Paul Sladen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352711
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352711
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #9 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
RPMlint issues:
python3-twine.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #23 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Tests are not performed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354649
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354649
Bug ID: 1354649
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-known-options - The known
options used in Grunt
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352709
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352321
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
Tests are in the main tar ball so there is no need to add them separately.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352321
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347933
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227981
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202064
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner ---
Review swap with bug #1346457?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227981
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #8 from William Moreno ---
I am running the review, will update results soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347900
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #14 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to mulhern from comment #11)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #10)
> > (In reply to mulhern from comment #7)
> > > Would be good to justify git release, as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347973
--- Comment #9 from Jonny Heggheim ---
What is the status, have you agreed on an upgrade path?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354229
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343608
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/bubblewrap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #13 from Julien Enselme ---
> I think it would be helpful to put what you told me in Comment #2 in the spec
> file as a comment, to make it as clear as possible why there are two packages
> that seem to provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324667
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #12 from mulhern ---
Actually, if doing the install from github, it should be easy to run the tests
as a %check using the instructions in the upstream README.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #11 from mulhern ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #10)
> (In reply to mulhern from comment #7)
> > Would be good to justify git release, as opposed to taking a published
> > release from pypi:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #10 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to mulhern from comment #7)
> Would be good to justify git release, as opposed to taking a published
> release from pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytoml. I can't see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354545
Jun Aruga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jar...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
mulhern changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #8 from mulhern ---
Created attachment 1178487
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1178487=edit
review file
Completed review template.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #13 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #11)
> This should do it:
> SPEC:
> https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gst-transcoder/gst-transcoder.spec
Make sure to update the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #7 from mulhern ---
Would be good to justify git release, as opposed to taking a published release
from pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytoml. I can't see any reason,
actually.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354512
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #12 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
MUST: missing %{?_isa}
> %{_datadir}/gir-1.0/
not sure if it's good idea to own gir/typelib directories directly instead of
requiring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
This should do it:
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gst-transcoder/gst-transcoder-1.8.0-2.fc24.src.rpm
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #6 from mulhern ---
Typo: ^unversinned^unversioned
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #9 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #8)
> There isn't, to my knowledge, a macro that evaluates to /usr/lib on 64-bit
> systems. If there is, I'll use that, but if not, this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Cline ---
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-twine.spec
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-twine-1.6.5-4.fc25.src.rpm
Updated based on comments in IRC.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
There isn't, to my knowledge, a macro that evaluates to /usr/lib on 64-bit
systems. If there is, I'll use that, but if not, this is necessary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #7 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #6)
> Ping?
Would you update the spec file once fixing this line:
gst-transcoder.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
--- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5)
> Upstream is dead -> no bugtracker, no public repository.
Hmm, from the upstream website:
> Note: This project is now DEAD;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1339121
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #22 from Dave Love ---
Shortly after posting that I noticed what the problem probably was
(conditionals for openblas) and have tried another build. I'll upload a new
version later if that works.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #5 from mulhern ---
I think it would be helpful to put what you told me in Comment #2 in the spec
file as a comment, to make it as clear as possible why there are two packages
that seem to provide the same
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #5 from Jeremy Cline ---
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-twine.spec
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-twine-1.6.5-3.fc25.src.rpm
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190740
Sopot Cela changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msima...@redhat.com |mat.bo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
qhttpengine-0.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d951a498d5
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
qhttpengine-0.1.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-9e775d66cb
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #3)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> > > - The MIT/X11 is not in the .spec file under License tag.
> > > License:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Otherwise it seems OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
Yaniv Bronhaim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1339121
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
qhttpengine-0.1.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-68d6628c64
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343608
--- Comment #12 from mulhern ---
New build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14859863.
Fixes applied.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> %package -n python-%{srcname}-doc
can be used by: %package doc
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/twine %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/twine-3.4
never use 3.4 or 3.5 or 2.7, use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #21 from Dave Love ---
I now have packaging of the current version buildable x86_64, and against which
I can build PETSc. A scratch build on koji has failed on arm, at least, but I
can't access the logs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|admil...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Cline ---
Hi William,
Do you plan on continuing with this review? I have packages that depend on
Twine and I'd like to move along with that work, so if you don't think you can
get to this review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ---
Erk, they are also considered hints for Requires as well, to make it easier to
select something that "Provides" something when there are multiple providers.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561
--- Comment #8 from Adam Miller ---
Apologies for the delay, I'm unsure of how to proceed here as we don't have
Guidelines for Weak Dependencies on things that are from third-party
repositories. I've created a ticket with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> - The MIT/X11 is not in the .spec file under License tag.
> License:MIT
then what's there? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo