https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7)
> (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #6)
> > Also depends on python(3)-nbconvert for which I see no package request yet.
>
> I have submitted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtAwesome/python-QtAwesome.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtAwesome/py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279090
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Mailänder ---
This is a dependency you should bundle with OpenRA as we are also the upstream
for our fork.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380140 ?
thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Maybe you could add %doc CHANGELOG.md README.md for each pythonX sub packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Maybe you could add %doc README.md for each pythonX sub packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Well, changed Source URL anyway ... :)
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtPy/python-QtPy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/pytho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks for the review, gil.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Mailänder ---
Yes https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/12132 but the .NET to .NET Core
changes seem to cause NuGet dependency problems at least on Windows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
--- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtAwesome/python-QtAwesome.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtAw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #12 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #10)
> As shown in the package for entrypoints [1], `flit` will attempt to verify
> PyPI classifiers while building packages. This is great for PyPI,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Done!
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-flit/python-flit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-flit/python-fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #10 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
As shown in the package for entrypoints [1], `flit` will attempt to verify PyPI
classifiers while building packages. This is great for PyPI, but kind of
useless for us, because we're generally
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I am using this format ...
Source0: https://github.com/OWNER/%{name}/archive/%{commit0}.tar.gz basically
...
also, this is the same tarball -
$ sha256sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/v1.1.2.tar.gz qtpy-1.1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270525
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Mailänder ---
Looking good so far. https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/12132
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
> Most of the sources file are devoid of this information.
> Please, contact upstream and ask to confirm the licensing of code and/or
> content/s, and add license headers
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, use https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtpy/archive/v1.1.2/qtpy-1.1.2.tar.gz
Otherwise you should use the approach shown here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, use
https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome/archive/v0.3.3/qtawesome-0.3.3.tar.gz
Otherwise you should use the approach shown here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
--- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks for the build tomspur.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379096
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1327979
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
Depends
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-flit/python-flit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-flit/python-flit-0.9-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Looking at the source code of both upload.py and log.py, we can call it more of
a fork rather than bundled really ... Even looking at history of the file.
python-tornado - log.py
https://github.com/tor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Also fixed most issues .. hopefully.
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtPy/python-QtPy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379092
--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtAwesome/python-QtAwesome.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtAwesome/py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
exodusii-6.02-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #40 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #39)
> (In reply to lo1 from comment #38)
> > Previusly, as I saw Yunying's koji and copr output built fine in the
> > rawhide, I did a little digging and found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380540
Bug ID: 1380540
Summary: Review Request: votca-xtp - VOTCA excitation and
charge properties module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329838
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354113
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pytest-catchlog-1.2.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #39 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to lo1 from comment #38)
> Previusly, as I saw Yunying's koji and copr output built fine in the
> rawhide, I did a little digging and found that gcc and gcc-c++ are the
> exceptions. The "exc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #38 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #35)
> (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31)
> > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30)
> > > Changelog needs to be updated every time you make changes:
> > > htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376438
Bug 1376438 depends on bug 1376436, which changed state.
Bug 1376436 Summary: Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary
structures such as specified by MPEG, DVB, IETF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Wh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271785
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review-
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380528
Bug ID: 1380528
Summary: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient
multicast and transport stream manipulation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|vanmeeuwen+fedora@kolabsys. |piotr1...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Approved
You should fix line ending in README.md
nodejs-utfx.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/nodejs-utfx/README.md
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
--- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch ---
updated SRPM
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-utfx/nodejs-utfx.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-utfx/nodejs-utfx-1.0.1-2.fc26.src.rpm
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279091
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/openra-eluant.spec
SRPM:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/openra-eluant-20160124-2.fc25.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380178
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279091
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner ---
Easy fix for lua51:
sed -i s:lua51.dll:liblua-5.1.so: %{libname}/LuaApi.cs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this produ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279090
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
What's the state in OpenRA? Is SDL2-CS still a dependency? If no, I'll close
this request. For OpenAL-CS, we need another package review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
Matthias,
does OpenRA work also with the MaxMind GeoIP 2.7.x series?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270525
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
Matthias,
does OpenRA work also with the MaxMind DB 2.1.x series?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #22 from Raphae
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380442
--- Comment #1 from Carl George ---
My goal is to add this package to F24+ and EPEL7. The build requirement of
cargo is already in F24/F25/rawhide, but is still in testing for EPEL7.
Hopefully by the time this review is done it will have mov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380442
Bug ID: 1380442
Summary: Review Request: ripgrep - A search tool that combines
the usability of ag with the raw speed of grep
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #34 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #33)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #31)
> > Sorry, I have already updated to 3.7.3
>
> I'll check it a.s.a.p.
>
> > > [!]: %check is present and all tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374957
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #3 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Thanks. Updated versions:
Spec URL: http://clime.cz/fedpkg-copr.spec
SRPM URL: http://clime.cz/fedpkg-copr-0.8-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420
Bug ID: 1380420
Summary: Review Request: gomtree - Go CLI tool for mtree
support
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #33 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #31)
> Sorry, I have already updated to 3.7.3
I'll check it a.s.a.p.
> > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> >
> > Not run -- why not? (I thought they wer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(d.love@liverpool. |
|ac.uk)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #31 from Antonio Trande ---
Sorry, I have already updated to 3.7.3
SPEC:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/sagitter/petsc/petsc.git/plain/petsc.spec?id=ea9cded7030999e4f51dde529cae5647e5cc5173
SRPM:
https://copr-be.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-epi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769487
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769487
--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Thx for the reminder. I was very busy these time with a certain 3rd part
repository migration. But I should be more responsible now.
I will provide a formal review from the current state of th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Thank you, there seems to be another issue fedora-review found:
Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/lib/cmake/cmocka/cmocka-config-version.cmake
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769487
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(kwiz...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223455
Bug 1223455 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223442
Bug 1223442 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244899
Bug 1244899 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Bug 1159091 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
Bug 1222662 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Bug 1166897 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916
Bug 1166916 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218
--- Comment #8 from Pádraig Brady ---
Spec URL: https://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/zstd.spec
SRPM URL: https://pbrady.fedorapeople.org/zstd-1.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Zstd, is a fast lossless compression algorithm,
targeting real-time comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380313
Bug ID: 1380313
Summary: Review Request: fprobe - Collect network traffic data
and emit as NetFlow flows
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364093
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
--- Comment #4 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
(In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #2)
> > Not sure what you mean about (5).
>
> Sorry, yes, that was unclear :)
>
> In Fedora, we ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Hrozek ---
(In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #2)
> Not sure what you mean about (5).
Sorry, yes, that was unclear :)
In Fedora, we have a separate library that contains the statically-built
libcmocka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
Updated to handle 1,6:
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/mingw-cmocka.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/mingw-cmocka-1.1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
For (2), email w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769487
Thibault North changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(thibault.north@gm |
|ail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #37 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #35)
> (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31)
> > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30)
> All BuildRequires must be specified. Even gcc/gcc-c++.
gcc packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #36 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #35)
> (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #31)
> > (In reply to lo1 from comment #30)
> All BuildRequires must be specified. Even gcc/gcc-c++.
@Igor, the
92 matches
Mail list logo