https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
--- Comment #15 from yunying@intel.com ---
I manually started a new COPR build for this package, since its dependent
package tpm2-tss has just been updated:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/yunyings/tpm2-tools/build/472426/
No SPEC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
--- Comment #16 from Evan Klitzke ---
New spec: https://eklitzke.org/pyflame.spec
New SRPM: https://eklitzke.org/pyflame-1.2.1-1.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #44 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #43)
> I just added the TCGL to the Fedora license list. It is Free and GPL
> compatible, but only when applied to source code. When applied to
> docum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
endless-sky-0.9.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-325897ba92
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
endless-sky-0.9.4-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-51b9047635
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
endless-sky-0.9.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3f9fed873a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
--- Comment #15 from Evan Klitzke ---
I have a pull request upstream that changes runtests.sh so that it will work
when building the RPM package: https://github.com/uber/pyflame/pull/43/files .
In particular, the change makes it so "./runtest.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
--- Comment #14 from Evan Klitzke ---
I made the changes upstream so that Pyflame will support both Python2 and
Python3 at once.
I will work on the test changes, so the test suite runs under both Python
releases too, as well as the other pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202470
--- Comment #16 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8536
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8537
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384729
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-decorator-4.0.10-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0f38c85d79
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384729
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-decorator-4.0.10-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2cbe7d2486
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202470
Antti Järvinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202470
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Antti Järvinen from comment #13)
> Sorry the delay, I made the initial review when I was not in packagers group
> so I considered my review only informational and then forgot about it. But
> o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387873
--- Comment #4 from Michal Ambroz ---
Hello Michael,
>The python3 package is named PyX
I have used the naming in lover-case as I believe it goes best with the python
package naming conventions and it has been also suggested to be like that in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #11 from Christoph Junghans ---
I fixed it https://github.com/StanfordLegion/legion/pull/204
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16275958
Spec URL: http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion.sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202470
Antti Järvinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(antti.jarvinen@ka |
|tiska.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916
--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner ---
Maybe DotFuzzy is an alternatve, it's clearly licensed with LGPLv3+.
https://github.com/MicheleBertoli/DotFuzzy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
--- Comment #7 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I think that macro is not even needed anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System ---
petsc-3.7.4-12.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383725
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-restructuredtext-lint-0.17.2-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System ---
petsc-3.7.4-12.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373641
--- Comment #10 from Guido Aulisi ---
Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/setBfree.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/setBfree-0.8.2-3.fc24.src.rpm
Removed the -common package.
Added comments with links to submitted patches.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895077
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.hanneq...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384589
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384589
--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro ---
This package is already in the distro:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-docopt/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384589
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
--- Comment #6 from Parag Nemade ---
I am aware of that. The reason is simple, guidelines said only add that macro
if your package is also built on EPEL. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js#Automatic_Requires_and_Provides
Thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #20 from Hans Pabst ---
> Why does need python?
It's used by the build system. It's also used to "print code" when statically
generating specialized kernels (non-JIT). The latter is not used by the way the
library is built for gen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #8 from Athos Ribeiro ---
The sources contain a thirdparty directory, which contains:
/third_party/android/libBlocksRuntime
a lib from AOSP compiler-rt in [1], with the license in [2]
/third_party/mac/*
.o files
Can y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #7 from Athos Ribeiro ---
(In reply to Daniel Kopeček from comment #6)
> Well, the reason is to review the latest version of the project. There are
> ~160 commits since 0.8 release.
>
> Is it a problem to review a snapshot package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
snapd-glib-1.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-38ea79bbec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
snapd-glib-1.2-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e2ee0e99f1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
snapd-glib-1.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9a7ded88c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382922
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth-0.6.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
rpmdeplint-1.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
php-asm89-stack-cors-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #19 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #16)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
>
> > - Some minor warnings from rpmlint.
>
> Which ones do you want removed? I wasn't convinced they were wort
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1380106 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1388273
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/snapd-glib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379651
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Runge ---
Ankur, since the issue was only about feedparser, I would accept a backport of
the fix in feedparser from a later django version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
Zygmunt Krynicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: snapd-glib |Review Request: snapd-glib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsvet...@redhat.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
--- Comment #3 from Zygmunt Krynicki ---
Fixed and passed through mock now. Drops on fedorapepople updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Running it through mock causes it to fail to build indicating undefined macro
AC_PROG_INTLTOOL.
Please check and make sure all of your build dependencies are specified.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/snapd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390616
Bug ID: 1390616
Summary: Review Request: snapd-glib - Library providing a GLib
interface to snapd.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact||extras...@fedoraproject.org
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #23 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@zygoon.pl) |
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zygoon.pl
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
--- Comment #22 from Zygmunt Krynicki ---
Updated spec and SRPM
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zyga/snapd.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zyga/snapd-2.16-1.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390595
Bug ID: 1390595
Summary: Review Request: librdkafka - The Apache Kafka C
Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382922
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
rpmdeplint-1.2-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Well, the reason is to review the latest version of the project. There are ~160
commits since 0.8 release.
Is it a problem to review a snapshot package? The NVR guidelines are here:
https://fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #18 from Hans Pabst ---
I will look into the "make install" thing as well as resolving the issue about
the version stamps. For the latter, I will make the major.minor-file a real
file while the non-decorated file becomes a symlink.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro ---
Is there any specific reason to get it from the latest commit instead of just
packaging the latest release?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384133
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python3-suds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384729
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python3-decorator
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Rawhide scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16268910
Copr builds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mildew/sandbox/package/honggfuzz/
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #17 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Hans Pabst from comment #15)
> (3) OMP build key is not specified -> similar to #1
> I recommend to stay with #3.
Thanks -- I'd meant to change that.
> Other comments about the build specificat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Spec URL:
https://pagure.io/package-review-honggfuzz/raw/master/f/honggfuzz.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/package-review-honggfuzz/raw/master/f/honggfuzz-0.8-1.20161101git7ba1010.fc24.src.rpm
Descripti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370064
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Kopeček ---
Thanks! I'll update the spec and srpm links.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #16 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
> - gfortran and link commands still do not use default flags.
I'll check.
> - Some minor warnings from rpmlint.
Which ones do you want removed? I wasn't con
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781
--- Comment #11 from Michal Vala ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
>
> > All source files are without license headers.
> > Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389927
Lukas Bezdicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389927
Lukas Bezdicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lbezd...@redhat.com |soc...@v3.sk
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379651
--- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Ha! I'll provide it by the weekend hopefully. Should just be the one diff that
carries the feedparser fix between the two django versions, or should I check
the differences between feedparser a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389927
--- Comment #1 from Lukas Bezdicka ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %po
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388396
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hron
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389927
Lukas Bezdicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lbezd...@redhat.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781
--- Comment #10 from Michal Vala ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> javadoc "MUST be installed ... as part of javadoc subpackage ...".
> See:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation
> https://fedora-j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390177
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390477
Bug ID: 1390477
Summary: Review Request:
gnome-shell-extension-do-not-disturb-button - Don't
show desktop notifications until you're ready to look
at them.
85 matches
Mail list logo
