https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375765
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(space...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392090
--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro ---
I am not sure if we can use this name for the package. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Outdated_Python_package_naming_conventions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392090
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392089
--- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro ---
There are also some missing Requires:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
endless-sky-0.9.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3f9fed873a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
endless-sky-0.9.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392089
--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro ---
Would you use the template on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file?
It would really improve readability with all those macros set there.
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392089
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391598
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8588
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8589
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8586
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8587
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Please set the "Assigned To" field
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ocaml-ocamlbuild
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/ocaml-ocamlbuild/ocaml-ocamlbuild.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
Please use "install -pm 0644 man/ocamlbuild.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/"
for preserve file timestamp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/ocaml-ocamlbuild/ocaml-ocamlbuild.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
ocaml-ocamlbuild-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
I'd prefer to leave the debuginfo alone for now until we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I should note that:
[?]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlbuild(ocaml)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382928
Bug 1382928 depends on bug 1382926, which changed state.
Bug 1382926 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser - HTTP MultiPart
Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382926
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382926
Jon Disnard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Jon Disnard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Spec URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/ocaml-ocamlbuild/ocaml-ocamlbuild.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388344
Jon Disnard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875
Jon Disnard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392089
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1392090
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392090
Bug ID: 1392090
Summary: Review Request: pychromecast: Python library to
communicate with the Google Chromecast.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392089
Bug ID: 1392089
Summary: Review Request: python-zeroconf: Pure Python Multicast
DNS Service Discovery Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
other issues: "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}"
please use "Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
you should use %license LICENSE instead of %doc LICENSE in each (sub) packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for review this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385180
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
purple-facebook-0.0.0.20160409-0.4.git66ee773.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sentry-0.22.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-311313e9de
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sentry-0.22.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-10bf41d9af
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sentry-0.22.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1c2866b16d
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sentry-0.22.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-782ea745d0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sentry-0.22.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-759427ad21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391958
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande ---
>It is difficult to be complete here without a SRPM.
The package is not fully ready yet.
> going off the list of licenses available on https://trilinos.org/download
> /license/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391958
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
Bug 1350257 depends on bug 1382916, which changed state.
Bug 1382916 Summary: 64-bit interface version of openblas is not using 64-bit
integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382916
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384729
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-decorator-4.0.10-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384133
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-suds-0.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384133
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391487
--- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout ---
Please take a look at the following and let me know what you think:
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391487
--- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-vitrageclient-1.0.1-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1f4ea9c5d5
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-vitrageclient-1.0.1-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-48d37a7abd
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-marathon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-vitrageclient
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391291
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391958
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|122235 |182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391958
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||122235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1391958
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391958
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||505154
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I have compiled this package successfully on x86_64, aarch64, ppc64
and ppc64le.
You will need a scratch build of OCaml 4.04 in order to build it, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391958
Bug ID: 1391958
Summary: Review Request: trilinos - Software framework for the
solution of scientific problems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-sentry
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391457
--- Comment #10 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
When testing the python2 subpackage I stumbled upon some tracebacks
The python2 subpackage should have a runtime requirement for python-ipaddress
module because of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391291
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-DBICx-AutoDoc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
It's not possible to do a scratch build in Koji, because it needs
OCaml 4.04 which we're in the process of rebuilding.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
Bug ID: 1391951
Summary: Review Request: php-cs-fixer - A tool to automatically
fix PHP code style
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I should say that ocamlbuild was previously part of the ocaml package,
but in OCaml >= 4.03 it has been spun out into a new package, hence
the need to add a package to Fedora.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
rpmlint output is:
ocaml-ocamlbuild.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
This is a problem in rpmlint.
ocaml-ocamlbuild.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ocamlbuild.native
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391950
Bug ID: 1391950
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlbuild - Build tool for
OCaml libraries and programs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> >OK, so just switch this to GPLv3+ and delete all the other stuff?
> Yes.
>
Done.
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Raiskup ---
missing java checks:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge ---
Updated
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-vitrageclient.spec
SRPM:
http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-vitrageclient-1.0.1-4.fc26.src.rpm
Added:
- checks (on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review! -- and especially for catching the Monolog version
constraint
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge ---
Thank you for your comments!
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-vitrageclient.spec
SRPM:
http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-vitrageclient-1.0.1-3.fc26.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
--- Comment #2 from Javier Peña ---
Hi Matthias,
I have some small issues with the current spec file:
- The bash-completion subpkg needs to include a license file, since it could be
installed independently of the client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@lukos.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jp...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391892
Bug ID: 1391892
Summary: Review Request: python-vitrageclient - Python client
for Virage REST API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380942
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12)
> @gil,
> interesting, you're doing a review for your own (initial) spec file? :)
Well some time has passed since my first draft of this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391291
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536
Bug 1367536 depends on bug 1343661, which changed state.
Bug 1343661 Summary: Rebase clufter component [RHEL 7.3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391291
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
(In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1)
>
> FIX: Please add following build-requires:
> make - spec file lines: 41, 44, 48
> perl(base) - lib/DBICx/AutoDoc.pm:5
>
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo