https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256057
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen ---
Also I disclose here that currently this is a sub-package of snap-core in F25+.
Of course I will drop the sub-package once this package is available in Fedora.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256057
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256057
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen ---
Sorry for moving the goal-posts, but "rm LICENSE" in %install is deprecated
now.
Any chance you could update to latest cabal-rpm again?
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925993
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256073
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245021
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374137
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Thank you very much - I completely missed this, very sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397620
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-int64-buffer-0.1.9-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410007
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Please review the issues below:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410007
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-btchip-0.1.18-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b6b43c34c6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-btchip-0.1.18-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6fd7ecc578
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
Mike Goodwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138
--- Comment #12 from Leandro Costa ---
Hi, I was reading the wiki in order to understand the versioning... now I'm
more confused, on the git repository the last release is 1.2.2 from 2016-01-04,
but I'm packing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403314
Merlin Mathesius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409926
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392977
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
ocid-0-0.7.git2e6070f.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397620
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-int64-buffer-0.1.9-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
ebtree-6.0.8-4.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-43aa73acbf
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
ebtree-6.0.8-4.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 5.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7db3c27dd4
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
ebtree-6.0.8-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4fdc54e965
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Mark Harfouche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Mark Harfouche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #14 from Mark Harfouche ---
Created attachment 1237443
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1237443=edit
8-6 python-requests runtime dependency
Thanks Yuri
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #13 from Yuri Konotopov ---
Mark, python-requests runtime dependency is missing.
It was added in v8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #12 from Mark Harfouche ---
Created attachment 1237430
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1237430=edit
8-5 different extensions in different packages
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/asgp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409884
--- Comment #8 from Brian Exelbierd ---
I've realized I've made an error in my documentation fix patch - I will work on
fixing this fix. The short version is that my fix stops the zero-byte files
from being installed, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-btchip
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #11 from Mark Harfouche ---
Once this gets accepted, I don't see why we should have 1 package for chrome
chromium and firefox. It should really be split into 3 with 1 base package (and
maybe 1 package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #10 from Mark Harfouche ---
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Mark Harfouche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #8 from Yuri Konotopov ---
(In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #4)
>
> It creates a file for firefox in /usr/lib64 even on the 32 bit platform.
You could specify CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR to force library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #7 from Mark Harfouche ---
Created attachment 1237372
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1237372=edit
v8 for both 32 and 64 bit
probably doesn't work for firefox 32bit
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Mark Harfouche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397620
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392977
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #6 from Mark Harfouche ---
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hmaarrfk/chrome-gnome-shell/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #5 from Mark Harfouche ---
Created attachment 1237368
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1237368=edit
Chrome gnome shell vr 8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Mark Harfouche changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt ---
Anything in reply to comment 4?
v1.2.2 is from January 2016.
This checkout from git master is also v1.2.2 not v1.2,
$ grep _VER pixiewps-master/src/version.h
#define
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409884
--- Comment #7 from Brian Exelbierd ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> Please remove the configure.patch you have that removes appindicator
> support. There are desktops in Fedora (notably GNOME and Plasma) that do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409884
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Brian Exelbierd from comment #5)
> Another update:
>
> 1. I fixed the icon file name
> 2. Also, the upstream finally put the .desktop and icon somewhere we can
> reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel ---
Looks generally good. A few comments inline. Note that the style comments are
in generally merely my opinions, not blockers.
> Name: radare2
> Version:0.10.5
Please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
Mike Goodwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #9 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Mike Goodwin from comment #8)
> Thanks Jonny! I've linked them to this review and have asked them to comment
> to me or the ticket in reply to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #8 from Mike Goodwin ---
Thanks Jonny! I've linked them to this review and have asked them to comment to
me or the ticket in reply to the questionably-licensed files.
Re: the python3 stuff in the spec, i was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #33 from MartinKG ---
Hi Jeremy,
can we rerequest the package as asgp ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: asgp - 2D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Must:
* Please contact upstream to clarify licensing. Best if they put proper license
header and release new version.
Non critical:
* Consider removing the python3 code that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
--- Comment #6 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-vine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409884
--- Comment #5 from Brian Exelbierd ---
Another update:
1. I fixed the icon file name
2. Also, the upstream finally put the .desktop and icon somewhere we can
reference so I fixed that.
3. I am providing name corrected urls
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/docker/kubernetes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jer...@jcline.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge ---
Thank you! I will do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pantheon-terminal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409867
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Bug 804125 depends on bug 1293160, which changed state.
Bug 1293160 Summary: Re-enable building on armv7hl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293160
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410113
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392950
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/qclib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #32 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/andy-super-great-park
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
Fixed (for now), and I reported a bug upstream [0] about the possible license
discrepancies.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Cline ---
I neglected to mention in the above comment, but I trust you'll enable tests
when python-case lands in the next compose :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jer...@jcline.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410150
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1348906
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410150
Bug ID: 1410150
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-reflectwalk -
Go library for "walking" complex structures, similar
to walking a filesystem
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #31 from MartinKG ---
@Jeremy
many thanks for your assistance !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406517
--- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka ---
I don't think you need to make the constraint relative:
Obsoletes: docker-selinux <= %{epoch}:%{version}-28
It should be enough to fix it with some comment what is the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406517
--- Comment #3 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Based on [1] you are missing "Obsoletes: container-selinux < 2:1.12.5.13". Or
whatever version of the docker is the latest in the time of building first
container-selinux rpm from the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406517
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408620
--- Comment #10 from Gerd Pokorra ---
I got a pre-release from Paul. Paul fixes for us the incorrect-fsf-address
error. rpmlint do not show an error any more:
$ rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
According to licensecheck, this code is actually LGPLv3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Bauer ---
Thanks for the help Damian. Yes, I'd appreciate if you could forward his
response to me. Seems I went to the same college as the author so I may contact
him simply for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Bauer ---
Hi Petr,
Thank you for taking the time to produce such a thorough review. This will
definitely help me write better specfiles moving forward. It will take me a bit
to go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410126
Bug ID: 1410126
Summary: Review Request: pantheon-terminal - The terminal of
the 21st century
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743
--- Comment #10 from Michal Ambroz ---
Yes ... the xmass frenzy is behind us I will be on it now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410113
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
ebtree-6.0.8-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2ed27ba719
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
ebtree-6.0.8-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e10fdab597
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410113
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1410084
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410113
Bug ID: 1410113
Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Info - Tool for inspecting
Perl subroutines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
Ingvar Hagelund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ebtree
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo