https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-xtaci-kcp-go-3.15-1.20170517.git2fd1e3d.fc25 has been pushed to
the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450149
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-minidb-2.0.2-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450149
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438089
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #17 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451298
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
That's not really an error. The only thing that failed is installation of the
built packages in mock. This is most likely because you used '-n' and already
had the packages installed. IIRC, y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420931
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1373513 (RDO-OCATA) |1427510 (RDO-PIKE)
--- Comment #4 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451298
--- Comment #4 from Thanos Apostolou ---
Ok, I fixed those issues.
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/thanosapostolou/vertex-theme/vertex-theme.git/plain/vertex-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455886
--- Comment #2 from mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #1)
> Just two quick notes moment:
>
> 1) I am not sure whether the "Recommends: flash-plugin" is legit, i.e. if
> you can reference 3rd party repositories. You s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452126
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-m2r-0.1.5-2.git539a079.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670088
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421506
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Link Dupont from comment #6)
> - Removed ctest from %check
> - Split out translations into langpacks
In this case %find_lang commands do nothing. In fact, lang files are not
installed in '%{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451298
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432983
--- Comment #7 from srakitnican ---
camotics-1.1.1-3
SPEC URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/srakitnican/default/camotics.git/plain/camotics.spec?id=29ed27f71d3772f02ae02245c978d23a6d54bcdc
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #20 from Tomas Orsava ---
Oh, I apologise if it felt that way, that was not my intention at all. I
thought the course of action was decided in the rpm BZ#1410631, but now I
realize that it took some time before I had time to implem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455886
--- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch ---
Just two quick notes moment:
1) I am not sure whether the "Recommends: flash-plugin" is legit, i.e. if you
can reference 3rd party repositories. You should probably consult this with
some ML (legal?, packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1453084
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fedora-workstation-backgrounds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430364
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Gallagher ---
(In reply to Matthew Smith from comment #8)
> argbash.src:48: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
> %{_libdir}/argbash/
Oh, right. *That's* why I hadn't been using %{_libdir} originally.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455899
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@gmail.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455899
Bug ID: 1455899
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455886
mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/tiliado/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455886
Bug ID: 1455886
Summary: Review Request: nuvola-app-amazon-cloud-player -
Amazon Cloud Player for Nuvola Player 3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250178
Iwicki Artur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwicki.ar...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
--- Comment #19 from Panu Matilainen ---
My COPR repo has upstream git master version of rpm which differs from what
Fedora ships.
It's much better to be up-front about such things, dropping a quick note or
just adding us to CC of this bug wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430364
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Smith ---
Sorry for the delay, here is my review of 2.4.0
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445675
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
alembic-1.7.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
27 matches
Mail list logo