https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429226
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kryz...@ispms.ru
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c755bcbeff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
molsketch-0.5.1-7.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6ccf2bb289
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542902
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542902
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-pecl-redis4-4.0.0~RC1-4.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f266a9f303
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #32 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/molsketch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
--- Comment #14 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566
--- Comment #7 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
You are requering gobjects, is whipper a command line tool or provides a
grafical user interface? If so work with upstream to include a desktop file and
appdata.xml file.
[
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
> > - Is it really necessary to split the python part into a separate library
> > package? It doesn't seem to be used as a library, only as a binary.
>
> I did this after asking a few questions in the #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
--- Comment #13 from William Moreno ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/fedelibre/extractpdfmark/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00709990-extractpdfmark/extractpdfmark.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/resu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519906
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabrice.salva...@orange.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #10 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
> sh-4.4# python3
> Python 3.6.4 (default, Feb 1 2018, 11:03:59)
> [GCC 8.0.1 20180127 (Red Hat 8.0.1-0.6)] on linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
Ron Olson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #13 from Ron Olson ---
Okay
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #9 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not? If not, can the
> folder be deleted, just to make it clear?
The wxWidgets source isn't used EXCEPT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #14 from Roman Joost ---
Alright went full cycle. Hope this helps?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
Ron, that's perfectly fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
--- Comment #11 from Ron Olson ---
I believe I've resolved all the known outstanding issues and have updated the
spec and RPMs at https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/. 4.1 is still
not released; would it be okay to review the packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert ---
Thanks a lot for the review! I'll get working on your comments.
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> Python 2 install uses easy_install, Python 3 uses build.py, is there a
> reason for the differ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491216
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #22 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491216
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #31 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Thank you very much Antonio!
Once again, it's been very educational.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #30 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491216
--- Comment #20 from Pavlina Moravcova Varekova ---
Thank you very much. I asked the upstream and they edit the package name. Now
> Source0:
> https://github.com/SatelliteQE/%{name}/archive/%{version}.tar.gz
is changed to:
> Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543578
--- Comment #6 from Christian Glombek ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lorbus/php-deepdiver-zipstreamer/fedora-27-x86_64/00713543-php-deepdiver-zipstreamer/php-deepdiver-zipstreamer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544151
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542902
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-pecl-redis4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267468
--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-codeclimate-test-reporter
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544151
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-idna-ssl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544081
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542902
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4479
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4480
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544239
Bug ID: 1544239
Summary: Review Request: unison248 - There is a new
incompatible version of unison240
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
sh-4.4# python3
Python 3.6.4 (default, Feb 1 2018, 11:03:59)
[GCC 8.0.1 20180127 (Red Hat 8.0.1-0.6)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
Created attachment 1394591
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1394591&action=edit
license breakdown
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
Created attachment 1394590
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1394590&action=edit
rpmlint filtered a bit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
License file LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt is not marked as %license.
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wxPython-4.0.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/wx/lib/pubsub/LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt
/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #29 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Built from the newest snapshot, source for OpenBabel interface removed from
devel subpackage.
Spec URL: https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/Molsketch/molsketch.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alexpl.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544081
--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee ---
Spec URL: https://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/grc.spec
SRPM URL: https://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/grc-1.11.1-2.fc28.src.rpm
- Remove unnecessary BR python2-devel
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Gradina ---
new spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-guard-rspec.spec
new srpm:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-guard-rspec-4.7.3-2.fc28.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Prokop from comment #6)
> Hi, I'll be taking this for a review. Have you advanced with the package,
> Ilya?
Thanks Jaroslav,
I'll send a new version of the package soon.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
Jaroslav Prokop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
Jaroslav Prokop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jar.pro...@volny.cz
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
What Fedoras/EPELs are you targeting here? Use python2-numpy instead of numpy
if possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Python 2 install uses easy_install, Python 3 uses build.py, is there a reason
for the difference?
What's up with tests? They seem to be both disabled and || true. Do they fail
totally, or only some fail?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631
--- Comment #18 from mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Andrew Toskin from comment #17)
> I'm pretty sure 3.26 is supposed to be the latest version of GNOME Shell
> which the extension was tested against. GNOME Shell *extensions* all have a
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
