https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539209
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
ddgr-1.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542646
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
patool-1.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525698
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539366
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631
--- Comment #20 from mgans...@alice.de ---
Thanks for the review !
the version is now gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-28-0.2.20180208gite3cea60
hope that's ok now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544605
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544605
--- Comment #2 from Eli Young ---
GitHub is used as the source instead of PyPI because the tarfile uploaded to
PyPI has been stripped of tests and, more critically, the license.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544605
--- Comment #1 from Eli Young ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24984110
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544605
Bug ID: 1544605
Summary: Review Request: python-digitalocean - Easy access to
Digital Ocean APIs to deploy droplets, images and more
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631
Andrew Toskin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492475
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #12 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Prokop from comment #11)
> The Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess failures are happening because bundler is
> needed for them and the upstream does not seem to mention that or require it
> at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #7)
> Ping ... What is the status here, please? The package was approved already
> ...
excuse me, it is fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544562
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-bacon-colored_output. You may commit
to the branch "f28" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544562
Eli Young changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492896
Eli Young changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544562
--- Comment #1 from Eli Young ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24972645
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544562
Bug ID: 1544562
Summary: Review Request: python-certbot-dns-route53 - Route53
DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #16 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #14)
> Alright went full cycle. Hope this helps?
Thanks, everything is works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #15 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #14)
> Alright went full cycle. Hope this helps?
Thanks Roman,
I corrected the spec:
new spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544555
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528781
James Paul Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo- |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544555
--- Comment #2 from Eli Young ---
Note that tests are disabled because most of them require internet access.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528781
James Paul Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jamesturner246@gm |needinfo-
|ail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544555
--- Comment #1 from Eli Young ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24972427
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544555
Bug ID: 1544555
Summary: Review Request: python-certbot-dns-google - Google
Cloud DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Prokop ---
The Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess failures are happening because bundler is needed
for them and the upstream does not seem to mention that or require it at all in
the file. I recommend notifying upstream a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #9)
> Oh, you are applying the latest packaging techniques (unpacking the gem via
> %setup), very nice :)
>
> However, the "rspec -Ilib spec ||:" is too hand-wavy. If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
--- Comment #6 from David Benoit ---
It seems FE-DEADREVIEW was auto-blocked when the old bug was marked as a
duplicate of this. I have removed the block since we are still actively
working on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
David Benoit changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566
--- Comment #8 from Matthew ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mruszczyk/whipper/fedora-27-x86_64/00714229-whipper/whipper.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mruszczyk/whipper/fedora-27-x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541554
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541554
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
podman-0.2-1.git3d0100b.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-803745b92f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
--- Comment #29 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sirikali
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #28 from Raphael Gr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #35 from digimer ---
I think I have integrated the comments, save for the last one in comment #34
for "buildrequire". I'm not sure what you are referring to, specifically. If I
can get clarification on that, or missed anything, ple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
--- Comment #27 from Raphael Groner ---
Thanks for the review!
What's wrong with the comments above the patches? I forgot how upstream gets
notified and let know about both commits. Maybe upstream wrote me by e-mail.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #38 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525698
Bug 1525698 depends on bug 1525694, which changed state.
Bug 1525694 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson - Go
package to interact with arbitrary JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525694
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525694
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525696
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525698
Bug 1525698 depends on bug 1525696, which changed state.
Bug 1525696 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-nwidger-jsoncolor -
Colorized JSON output for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525696
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544239
--- Comment #2 from dper...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for the feedback. I've implemented the requested changes ('Group:'
has been removed, the COPYING file is specified as a %license instead of %doc,
and and Appdata file has been added). Please s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544468
--- Comment #2 from Steve Grubb ---
Thanks for the review. New SRPM and spec file reposted.
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> Hello,
>
> - Not used in Fedora anymore:
>
> Group:
>
> BuildRoot:
>
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543813
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542650
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qevercloud. You may commit to the branch
"f27" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301219
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542650
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: QEverCloud |Review Request: qevercloud
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542650
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ben R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #34 from Jan Friesse ---
@digimer:
Few more comments to kronosned section.
It's now safe to expect systemd_post to exists so it's better to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Packaging, so for knet it
means:
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
Jan Friesse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfrie...@redhat.com
--- Comment #33 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #37 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
I just did.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544468
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Hello,
- Not used in Fedora anymore:
Group:
BuildRoot:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
- Use the correct systemd macros:
%{?systemd_requires}
BuildRequires: systemd
- the l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544239
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
A couple of preliminary remarks:
- Group: is not needed anymore in Fedora
- The license file (COPYING) must not be included with %doc, but with
%license:
%files
%doc src/NEWS src/README unison-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #12 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #11)
> (In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> > > There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544468
Daniel Kopeček changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544468
Bug ID: 1544468
Summary: Review Request: fapolicyd - Application Whitelisting
Daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540335
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt ---
> 1)
That is a recent change indeed.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_Libraries
> 3)
If the package naming bugs you that much, you could go a step further and build
the fol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544239
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Bl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from V
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
--- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543813
--- Comment #2 from Lukas Zapletal ---
Thanks Neal,
good one. I actually bumped upstream to 1.0.2 so there is now both python3 and
2 compatibility. Shebang now uses python3 by default.
https://github.com/lzap/pwkickstart/commit/c19c8a5b77b8c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301219
--- Comment #15 from Damian Wrobel ---
*** Bug 1540833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
--- Comment #3 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Spec URL:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vascom/rpms/tcl-thread/raw/master/f/tcl-thread.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6624/24966624/tcl-thread-2.8.2-1.fc28.src.rpm
Deb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #26 from D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> %global debug_package %{nil}
Remove this row. Your package contains binaries, so they need to be stripped
into debuginfo package.
> Requires: tcl(abi) = 8.6
You don't need to specify ABI versio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vit...@easycoding.org
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #9)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> > There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not? If not, can the
> > folder be deleted, just to make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #36 from Antonio Trande ---
Why not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
Bug ID: 1544384
Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Tcl Thread extension
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Rep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #35 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Antonio, do you think that I should add Molsketch (and/or SciDAVis) to the
comps XML file under "Engineering and Scientific"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
Oh, you are applying the latest packaging techniques (unpacking the gem via
%setup), very nice :)
However, the "rspec -Ilib spec ||:" is too hand-wavy. If the test suite fails
entirely, you won't notice. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544081
--- Comment #4 from Robin Lee ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> - You didn't change 1.11.1 by %{version} in Source0. It would be easier for
> future updates.
Sorry, I missed this point. I will fix it during importing.
80 matches
Mail list logo
