https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463253
Juan Badia Payno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463538
Juan Badia Payno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392649
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(philipp@redfish-s |
|olutions.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563437
Bug ID: 1563437
Summary: Review Request:
nodejs-conventional-changelog-codemirror - A
conventional-changelog CodeMirror preset
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563382
--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith ---
Repo requested at https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5593.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563382
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #15 from Michal Ambroz ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5587
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5588
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5589
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #14 from Michal Ambroz ---
Thank you Robert-Andre.
BTW just try running "rpmbuild -bp libemu.spec" then going to the build
directory and using "git status", "git log" , "git diff" , "git reset --hard
HEAD~1" commands. It is extrem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #12 from Michal Ambroz ---
Hi Robert
- I am using git the same way from prep script how it is used from the
autosetup.
It is same reason as already mentioned by Jason - I have all changes from
patches (14 is too many to fiddle wit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563189
--- Comment #1 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Shouldn't the
Requires: sed
be
BuildRequires: sed
instead?
This is the only potential problem I have found except for upstream not
providing license text in Source0 (which is only "Should" it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I'm talking about:
git commit -q -a -m "unbundle libdasm"
git commit -q -a -m "downgrade autoconf for rhel6"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563353
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ---
From a package maintainer standpoint, it can be extremely useful to use
%autosetup -S git if you are applying more than a couple of patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563382
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Why do you git commit stuff? This is useless. You shouln't even need git.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
libdasm-1.6-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2343c53de1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
libdasm-1.6-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a0917c8330
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
libdasm-1.6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0acbb92afb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libdasm-1.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c9d5e8c275
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
libdasm-1.6-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8adce9baab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|libdasm |
--- Comment #9 from Michal Ambroz -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563382
Bug ID: 1563382
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-atom - A
conventional-changelog atom preset
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711
--- Comment #8 from Michal Ambroz ---
Hello Robert-Andre,
thankyou for review - here is the updated package:
Spec URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/libemu.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/libemu-0.2.0-8.20130410gitab48695.fc27.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535207
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
ravada-0.2.14-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8109ac4a9b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #89 from Michael Catanzaro ---
It has nothing to do with RHEL... the goal is to get AAC support into Fedora so
that GStreamer can play MP4 videos. The other half of the effort will be
enhancing OpenH264 to support MP4.
Spot has al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dfc9a8ee5f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #88 from Kevin Kofler ---
The thing is, this kind of transitory approval:
(quoting Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #75)
> If the FSF provides clarity, I will add it to this ticket. Obviously, if
> they find it to be non-free (and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8e767badb9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #87 from Michael Catanzaro ---
We can't block indefinitely on the FSF. Since they can't provide us with a
timeline in which we can expect an answer, it's time to proceed.
It's also not appropriate to ask Fedora maintainers to addi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563204
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563353
Bug ID: 1563353
Summary: Review Request: python-click-completion - Add
automatic completion support for fish, Zsh, Bash and
PowerShell to Click
Product: Fedora
V
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562519
--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-crypt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Log-Log4perl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551339
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shelldap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-neomodel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyev
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #40 from Jie Kang ---
Will approve once final spec/srpm is posted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #39 from Jie Kang ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #38 from Jie Kang ---
Also one more typo in spec file:
# this is conifg tempalte, thus not config-noreplace
%config %{etcjavadir -- %{?1}}/conf/management/jmxremote.password.template
s/tempalte/template
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #37 from Jie Kang ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #36)
> > ###
> > java-openjdk-src.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C The java-openjdk-src
> > subpackage contains the complete OpenJDK 10 class library source code for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562632
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Std-0.903-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562650
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-babelex-0.9.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562631
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Restrict-2.3.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532042
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
compton-0.1-0.1.beta3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562245
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-neo4j-driver-1.5.3-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562631
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTML-Restrict-2.3.0-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562650
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562632
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Std-0.903-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560823
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562245
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-neo4j-driver-1.5.3-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #86 from Kevin Kofler ---
What I would like to see is
1. an answer from the FSF, and then, depending on the answer:
2. a. if the FSF considers the license non-free, this review request dropped,
OR
2. b. if the FSF considers the lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #85 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562631
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562632
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562245
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-neo4j-driver-1.5.3-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562245
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563204
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Latest version packaged
> - License ok
> - Builds in Mock
> - No rpmlint errors
>
> Please install the LICENSE file with %license, and README.md
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563164
--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Will do, thanks for the quick review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #36 from jiri vanek ---
In addition,. I had checked the state of atk wrapper. It is dead. So i will
remove the empty packages in addition...(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #35)
> A few specific rpmlint errors I would like to ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555219
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
R-gdata-2.18.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552442
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
php-pragmarx-google2fa-3.0.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555219
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
R-gdata-2.18.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563204
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563164
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I know I was forgetting something: bump the release to 4.1.1, which was
released one hour ago.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563164
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Updated files on the same links.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #35 from Jie Kang ---
A few specific rpmlint errors I would like to address:
###
java-openjdk.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:10.0.0.46-1
['1:10.0.0.46-7.fc27', '1:10.0.0.46-7']
Will the version be set to back to 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #84 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #81)
...
> Put it simply it's RF who is the second class citizen here, not the other
> way around. So it's a RF maintainer's duty to cope with the Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559861
Bug 1559861 depends on bug 1559858, which changed state.
Bug 1559858 Summary: Review Request: php-mock-integration2 - Integration
package for PHP-Mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559858
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559938
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559858
Bug 1559858 depends on bug 1559857, which changed state.
Bug 1559857 Summary: Review Request: php-mock2 - PHP-Mock can mock built-in PHP
functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559857
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559858
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559285
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563189
cl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cl...@redhat.com
Assignee|n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #83 from Peter Robinson ---
> What now?
The reviewer can probably un-set and re-set the review + flag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #82 from Wim Taymans ---
$ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60
days ago
What now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947
--- Comment #2 from Matt Prahl ---
Thank you for the review Robert!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563204
Bug ID: 1563204
Summary: Review Request: rust-tokio-timer - Timer facilities
for Tokio
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563189
Bug ID: 1563189
Summary: Review Request: obs-service-set_version - OBS source
service: Update spec file version
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
URL and Source0 addresses are Ok.
Source archive (SHA-256:
23ebbb05893a05ebfe397fbce55152df8f9d6500125a8042f1aa6cfa93fc23c4) is original.
Ok.
Summary is Ok.
Description is Ok.
License verified from lib/Test/L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
Bug ID: 1563184
Summary: Review Request: rpkg-util - RPM packaging utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551339
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #81 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #78)
> (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77)
> > (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> > > let's move on, please requ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #80 from Peter Lemenkov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mgansser@online.d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563164
Bug ID: 1563164
Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-src-d-billy - The missing
interface filesystem abstraction for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #79 from Kevin Kofler ---
(In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> let's move on, please request the repo using ->
>
> $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
Please don't. I put back the FE-Legal block w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1563021
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562794
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160
Bug ID: 1563160
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Log-Log4perl - Test log4perl
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
99 matches
Mail list logo
