https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796298
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #5 from j...@kcore.org ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #4)
> I'm really sorry for letting this sit for several months!
>
> Can you upload the SRPM to a more permanent place than koji, and I'll take
> another look? Your bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564720
--- Comment #4 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/larsks/watchman/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00739568-watchman/watchman.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/larsks/watch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564720
--- Comment #3 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman ---
> - Use %{_rundir} instead of /run
Done.
> - I don't think BuildRequires: systemd is necessary.
Without that the %{_tmpfilesdir} macro is undefined.
> - Dubious files permissions:
Those are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565671
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565671
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-control-center-3.28.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a0a1cd4af2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558907
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830
Bug 1563830 depends on bug 1562964, which changed state.
Bug 1562964 Summary: Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for
c-ares
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964
What|Removed |Adde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562452
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549003
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564678
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564682
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848
Bug ID: 1565848
Summary: Review Request: Bear - Tool that generates a
compilation database for clang tooling
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755922
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796288
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796322
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796317
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413
--- Comment #54 from Mickaël Guessant ---
Well, I managed to build on Centos 7, see:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:mguessan:branches:home:achimh:branches:home:dammage:davmail/davmail
Note that this is still based on source packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796322
Bug 796322 depends on bug 796317, which changed state.
Bug 796317 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Canvas-GradientColor - To create a
Canvas widget with background gradient color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796317
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564716
--- Comment #6 from Michal Ambroz ---
Raised package request:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5890
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5891
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5892
https://pagur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539291
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-echo-0.1.3-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser ---
I'm really sorry for letting this sit for several months!
Can you upload the SRPM to a more permanent place than koji, and I'll take
another look? Your build was deleted.
But generally, it seems as though t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843646
--- Comment #9 from Ben Rosser ---
Ping; are you still interested in this (and the other ticket, sugar-tuxmath)?
Do you intend to continue working on these packages?
It's been many months since my last comment. As per
https://fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487067
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libocxl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #9 from Javier Peña ---
Review notes:
- The rpmlint notes about macros in comments are expected. Unit tests are
currently disabled due to an issue in the tagged version, and should be enabled
in the future.
The package is APPROVE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #8 from Chandan Kumar ---
Updated spec:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc.spec
SRPM:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc-0.2.1-6.fc27.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558362
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #7 from Chandan Kumar ---
Updated spec:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc.spec
SRPM:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc-0.2.1-5.fc27.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562643
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-slixmpp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Michel Normand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Package Review: libocxl |Package Review: libocxl -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565671
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-control-center
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nudatus. You may commit to the branch
"f28" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #16 from Michel Normand ---
scratch build on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26291946
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564835
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #6 from Javier Peña ---
Two final issues I have found on a test fedora-review run, and we should be
done:
- Even if we do "py.test ||", fedora-review fails when running unit tests, so
we'd better comment it out.
- In the %files s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562643
--- Comment #6 from Matthieu Saulnier ---
thanks again for the review :)
SCM repo request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5882
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiodns
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564716
--- Comment #5 from Michal Ambroz ---
Thank you Robert-Andre.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564835
--- Comment #5 from Zamir SUN ---
I just did some more research and fixed the issue on my machine. Now it works.
SPEC URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/gmediarender.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/gmediarender-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #5 from Chandan Kumar ---
Updated SPEC:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc.spec
SRPM:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc-0.2.1-4.fc27.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565671
Chris Sandler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565671
Bug ID: 1565671
Summary: Review Request: gnome-control-center - Utilities to
configure the GNOME desktop
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chku...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
ipython-6.3.1-1.fc28 python-backcall-0.1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-785c5e4c66
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281
--- Comment #19 from Marcel Plch ---
If anyone relies on this or is blocked by this, please, let me know. This
package is not on top of my todo list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Thank You.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683
bdemers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(Brian.Demers@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #3 from Javier Peña ---
Hi Chandan,
Thanks for the fixes. I still have some comments:
- The with_python3 snippet still needs to be changed (see comment 1)
- Please include python BRs within "%if 0%{?with_python3} ... %endif",
oth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565626
Bug ID: 1565626
Summary: Review Request: python-nudatus - Strip comments from
Python scripts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830
--- Comment #2 from Matthieu Saulnier ---
hi,
many thanks for the review :)
SCM repo request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5797
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138
Tomáš Korbař changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomas.k...@seznam.cz
--- Comment #16 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565097
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1387943
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565603
Bug ID: 1565603
Summary: Review Request: python-microfs - CLI and Python module
to work with BBC micro:bit filesystem
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-backcall
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565097
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-ModuleMetadata
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from Dan H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
LICENSE added.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Thanks for the swift review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
--- Comment #2 from Chandan Kumar ---
Hey Jpena,
Thanks for the review.
Below is the updated
SPEC: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc.spec
SRPM:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1563215
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565571
Bug ID: 1565571
Summary: Review Request: python-backcall - Specifications for
callback functions passed in to an API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539291
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-echo-0.1.3-3.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-34d8fbd75e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amora...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||v...@cisco.com
--- Comment #2 from Alan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #14 from Michel Normand ---
OK I moved man in *devel rpm and kept html in *docs rpm
I did not change the Source0 to ease compare with previous URL line and allow
direct access from either vi or emacs editors when in spec.
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jp...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák ---
If the content of the man pages and html file is the same, then I would merge
the man pages into the devel subpackage (where usually basic API documentation
goes, I mean headers + man pages should be installe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680
--- Comment #12 from Michel Normand ---
(In reply to Michel Normand from comment #11)
> I updated the spec file for your previous comments
> except the man pages and html ones both generated by doxygen,
> so kept them both in the noarch pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
Yatin Karel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yka...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #30 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
Yes, It would have been less painful if your process did not pass fd's to dbus.
That is really something I dislike about dbus. I think I like varlink a lot in
that regard.
Nevertheless, I agree t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #29 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
Got it. Thanks a lot for your explanations.
I think I'll probably go with (b) then. I like the idea of having independent
modules for SELinux policies but now I understand that policies for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565504
Bug ID: 1565504
Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-apidoc - A Sphinx
extension for running sphinx-apidoc on each build
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #28 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
The CIL policy language would be a solution to this particular challenge. With
the CIL language the interfaces are part of the modules. That means that there
are no header packages. The interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #27 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
Exactly.
a. Is in theory the most sane solution I Believe.
b. Is probably the most practical solution but that basically ignores
modularization
c. Would be a short-term solution but is eventually
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #26 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to dac.override from comment #25)
> Basically the way I see it is that this modularization effort requires that
> the headers are alway's installed if policy is installed. That then m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #25 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
Basically the way I see it is that this modularization effort requires that the
headers are alway's installed if policy is installed. That then means that the
various policy-devel packages need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #24 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
In other words, you might get into a chicken and egg situation here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
94 matches
Mail list logo
