https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-ocagent-0.4.10-1.fc29 has been pushed to the
Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694438
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks, Robert!
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10854
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692584
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
js8call-1.0.0-2.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7da1b31c98
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
js8call-1.0.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-525f2a22bd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Thank you so much! I owe you one!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695373
Bug ID: 1695373
Summary: Review Request: python-ics - Intrepidcs icsneo40
Python API/Wrapper
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33899575
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371
Bug ID: 1695371
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-masterminds-semver-1 -
Work with semantic versions in go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
--- Comment #6 from jo...@lanl.gov ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #5)
Once again thank you for your timely feedback. Below are answers to questions
that were not addressed in the updated spec file.
Spec file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695362
Bug ID: 1695362
Summary: Review Request: python-metaextract - get metadata for
python modules
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692584
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695323
Bug ID: 1695323
Summary: Review Request: freeipa-healthcheck - Health check
tool for FreeIPA
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694292
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
Minor license fixes:
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/yacreader.spec
SRPM URL:
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/yacreader-9.5.0-4.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590
--- Comment #21 from Jon Dufresne ---
Should this be closed as a duplicate of Bug 1564720?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-zeep
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/js8call
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581407
--- Comment #5 from Dan Radez ---
Uploaded these
http://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-jaraco-packaging.spec
http://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-jaraco-packaging-6.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581404
--- Comment #10 from Dan Radez ---
I've updated the spec file and uploaded it taking out the py2 stuff.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw ---
Whoops! Hard to see in PuTTY, comments are dark blue :)
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: js8call - |Review Request: js8call -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-ocagent-0.4.10-1.fc29 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-609c9f1cc9
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #14 from Numan Siddique ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #12)
> - Add BR for gcc
>
> - Update License field
>
>
> BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
> ---
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315809
Bug 1315809 depends on bug 1315805, which changed state.
Bug 1315805 Summary: Review Request: python-requests-unixsocket - Use requests
to talk HTTP via a UNIX domain socket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315805
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315809
Dan Radez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1695172
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315805
Dan Radez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695172
Dan Radez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1411746, 1290163
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695172
Bug ID: 1695172
Summary: Review Request: python-requests-unixsocket - Use
requests to talk HTTP via a UNIX domain socket
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315805
--- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar ---
No worries, I'm fine with Dan taking over this review :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315805
Dan Radez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1411746
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695158
Tomas Krizek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petr.spa...@nic.cz
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695158
Bug ID: 1695158
Summary: Review Request: lua-basexx - BaseXX encode/decode
library for Lua
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
Jan Staněk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695139
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
> # Don't use py3_build because it doesn't work
How? Define doesn't work.
> %prep
> # Remove bundled egg-info
> rm -rf xonsh.egg-info
>
> %autosetup -n %{name}-%{version}
Removing anything before
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315805
Dan Radez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dra...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Forgot to post the review:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Add BR for gcc
- Update License field
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
---
openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_byteorder.h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695139
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695139
Carmen Bianca Bakker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695139
Bug ID: 1695139
Summary: Review Request: xonsh - A general purpose, Python-ish
shell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #11 from Numan Siddique ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #10)
>
> > >
> > > - What platform are you targeting that don't have systemd macros? They
> > > are
> > > even on EPEL7.
> > > Remove all the %if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694246
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fondo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #12 from Timothée Floure ---
Spec URL: https://paste.sr.ht/blob/6f08debced80ff689face8a4b9fa374df719bded
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8176/33888176/mako-1.2-1.fc31.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581407
--- Comment #4 from Dan Radez ---
sry, been distracted from this for a while. I'll get an update posted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581404
--- Comment #9 from Dan Radez ---
sry, been distracted from this for a while. I'll get an update posted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oidn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-typing-extensions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> >
> > - What platform are you targeting that don't have systemd macros? They are
> > even on EPEL7.
> > Remove all the %if 0%{?systemd_*:1} conditionals.
> >
>
> Done
You removed the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libunarr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694246
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694278
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
We have no other choice than to trust that upstream won't rewrite their Github
history. Thousands of packages already depend on Github archive links. Source0
will be uploaded to dist-git once you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #11 from Jan Staněk ---
(In reply to Timothée Floure from comment #10)
> I wasn't aware of those macros (and did not find them rpm.org!) and could
> not find a way to work with non-archived sources with %setup or %autosetup.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824
--- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
The mock build seems to fail. Is it trying to fetch some data for the build?
Mock Version: 1.4.14
Mock Version: 1.4.14
Mock Version: 1.4.14
ENTER ['do'](['bash', '--login', '-c',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #18 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Petra Alice Mikova from comment #17)
> (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #15)
> > (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
> > > One expect digit in the middle.
> >
> > I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #10 from Timothée Floure ---
Spec URL: https://paste.sr.ht/blob/471e3097508c17ac55b83fc40f1cf0179d05ee6b
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4969/33884969/mako-1.2-1.fc31.src.rpm
I wasn't aware of those
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #17 from Petra Alice Mikova ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #15)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
> > One expect digit in the middle.
>
> I'm curious: What expects it? A human? Some tooling?
Some of our
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #9 from Jan Staněk ---
> No need, you can also add a local file as source, e.g.:
> Source0: systemd.unit
You can then also use the `%{SOURCE1}`, `%{SOURCE2}`... macros to refer to
their location within the build directory – for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689654
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #8 from Till Hofmann ---
(In reply to Timothée Floure from comment #7)
> 3. Hum, an extra source file implies to build an archive (is there another
> way?). The patch feels more convenient and seems right to me since I plan to
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #7 from Timothée Floure ---
Spec URL: https://paste.sr.ht/blob/4ac99254f98b254cd510f44d3cc793152dac1a25
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3934/33883934/mako-1.2-1.fc31.src.rpm
1. Fixed.
2. Fixed, missed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805
--- Comment #3 from Georg Sauthoff ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - License is MIT and BSD:
> https://github.com/mvantellingen/python-zeep/blob/master/LICENSE
Hm, I thought that it's fine if we consider MIT as the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #6 from Jan Staněk ---
Few more adjustments are necessary, unfortunately:
1. wayland-protocols dependency is constrained even in the 1.2 release [1]
- BuildRequires: pkgconfig(wayland-protocols) >= 1.14
2. The systemd unit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #9 from Numan Siddique ---
Updated URLs are:
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/numans/OVN/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00876521-ovn/ovn.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #8 from Numan Siddique ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> - Group is not used in Fedora
Done.
>
> - BuildRequires: systemd-units → BuildRequires: systemd-rpm-macros or
> BuildRequires: systemd for older
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #7 from Numan Siddique ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
Thanks for the review.
> - The obsoleted version should be the version the obsoleted package would
> have been if it was bumped
>
> Obsoletes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694278
--- Comment #2 from Rohan McGovern ---
> Consider running the tests:
>
> Source0: %url/archive/v%{version}/%{srcname}-%{version}.tar.gz
The tests aren't included in the tarball shipped to PyPI, I guess that may be
why you've suggested a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665614
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #16 from jiri vanek ---
both?
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Jan 19 12:58 java -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jan 19 12:58 java-11 ->
/etc/alternatives/java_sdk_11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #10 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Thank you. I will
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #5 from Timothée Floure ---
Spec URL: https://paste.sr.ht/blob/0c571b91aa27cbd527770853d13a38638c6423d1
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/473/33880473/mako-1.2-1.fc31.src.rpm
I will open issues upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
--- Comment #8 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #7)
> LGTM, package approved.
Thanks for the review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #9 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I hope in release you add some other changes:
1. Remove tab symbol from line 47. Use only spaces.
2. Make -doc subpackage noarch.
3. License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694246
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
Done.
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/fondo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/fondo-1.2.2-3.20190324git71d97ee.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
85 matches
Mail list logo
