https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599
--- Comment #1 from Bob Hepple ---
Fixed some obvious errors:
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/gjots2/fedora-31-x86_64/01337305-gjots2/gjots2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599
Bug ID: 1823599
Summary: Review Request: gjots2 - A heirarchical note jotter.
Organise your ideas, notes, facts in a tree
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812411
--- Comment #15 from Bob Hepple ---
New build from current master - pre-release of 1.1.3 - fixes python2 problem
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/bookworm/fedora-31-x86_64/01337284-bookworm/bookworm.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
Brandon Perkins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bperkins@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820846
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820846
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773718
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
--- Comment #9 from Brandon Perkins ---
(In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #7)
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/golang-github-
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
--- Comment #3 from Germano Massullo ---
Package approved
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
--- Comment #8 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-client-native.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820799
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822191
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1801758
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822187
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822191
Bug 1822191 depends on bug 1822187, which changed state.
Bug 1822187 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-otiai10-copy - Copy
directory recursively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822187
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801758
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1822191
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928
--- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #11)
> (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> > Why are you arbitrarily inventing an "elementary-" prefix for the package
> > name?
>
> Because there is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790091
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/androwarn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790091
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
--- Comment #9 from Artur Iwicki ---
SurgeScript got accepted as a separate package, so here's a koji scratch build.
spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/opensurge-0.5.1.2-4/opensurge.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
--- Comment #8 from Antonio T. (sagitter) ---
Correct and update both SPEC and SRPM files, please.
I will review your package one more time within tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/surgescript
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
Jun Aruga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||simde-0.0.0-1.git29b9110.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(bperkins@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
Antonio T. (sagitter) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
Antonio T. (sagitter) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #8 from Artur Iwicki ---
Eh. I'm having somewhat of a bad day. Sorry for being so confrontational about
such an unimportant thing.
I've reuploaded the files keeping their original names.
spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #7 from Artur Iwicki ---
>Thery're not my wishes, but the Packaging Guidelines:
>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_file_naming
I know, but so far people have been fine with the spec name in the srpm.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811775
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
You didn't fix this:
- Remove these in %install, %exclude is to be used only for file exclusion
between multiple packages:
%exclude %{gem_instdir}/.gitignore
%exclude %{gem_instdir}/.rubocop.yml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790091
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787452
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #26 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mupen64plus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815091
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Try backporting this patch maybe:
https://github.com/google/python-adb/commit/4b555e64d1e49d91ed851c59bb11b734b302f71d.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815091
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Ok maybe but current package is still not installable:
DEBUG util.py:621: Error:
DEBUG util.py:621: Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:621:- nothing provides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
%prep
%autosetup -n openosc-%{version}
the folder in the archive is OpenOSC-%{version} as I said before. The archive
in the SRPM is not the same as the one downloaded on Github, please fix that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
--- Comment #7 from Ryan O'Hara ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-129d21b52d has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-129d21b52d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-7e49dc4aad has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7e49dc4aad
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823151
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808467
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e1c2193379 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817811
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a77bfc43c6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773717
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773717
--- Comment #8 from Brandon Perkins ---
(In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #7)
>
> Requires
>
> golang-github-haproxytech-models-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
> go-filesystem
> golang(github.com/go-openapi/errors)
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797247
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802360
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797117
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797121
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773718
--- Comment #7 from Ryan O'Hara ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773717
--- Comment #7 from Ryan O'Hara ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #6 from Antonio T. (sagitter) ---
(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #5)
> The name of the spec file inside the SRPM is "surgescript.spec". But if you
> insist on the URL being the same, then be my guest.
>
Thery're not my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773716
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #5 from Artur Iwicki ---
The name of the spec file inside the SRPM is "surgescript.spec". But if you
insist on the URL being the same, then be my guest.
spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/surgescript-0.5.4.3-3/surgescript.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DEFERRED|DUPLICATE
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Bug ID: 1823419
Summary: Review Request: gnucobol - COBOL compiler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tachokni...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
Ron Olson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Sure, that works for me if it works for you. The tooling requires the
maintainer to submit the review but I'll CC you on the new one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #14 from Ron Olson ---
Hey Gwyn-
Funny, I was going off ftp.gnu.org and they don't have a 3.0, but yeah it seems
like that's the version to go with. Would you like to package this? It's fine
by me as yours looks more complete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Created attachment 1678467
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1678467=edit
My spec for reference
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Upstream indicates 3.0-rc1 is more stable than 2.2, I'd recommend packaging
that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gw...@protonmail.com
--- Comment #11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823151
--- Comment #3 from Dev Singh ---
I have also added the package to a COPR for Fedora/CentOS here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dsingh/thinkpad-tools/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #4 from Antonio T. (sagitter) ---
(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #3)
> I'm not entirely sure if the way the License: tag is specified right now is
> ok.
>
> spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/surgescript-0.5.4.3-2.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #3 from Artur Iwicki ---
I'm not entirely sure if the way the License: tag is specified right now is ok.
spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/surgescript-0.5.4.3-2.spec
srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/surgescript-0.5.4.3-2.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #10 from Ron Olson ---
Ah, that did the trick! I have uploaded the new spec file and SRPM to
https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/cobol-lang/.
What do you think of my -devel question; I figure that since the whole package
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #9 from Artur Iwicki ---
Snooping around the configure script once again, you can pass "--enable-debug"
to %configure to make the script leave the -g switch alone. No idea why
upstream made the script so adamant to remove it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a729ac8728 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a729ac8728
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-217b6928cc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-217b6928cc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #8 from Ron Olson ---
Hi Artur-
Sorry, I changed the package name to be more Fedora-friendly. The SRPM is at
https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/cobol-lang/gnucobol-2.2-1.fc31.src.rpm.
The package requires all the files to work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823151
Dev Singh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823381
Bug ID: 1823381
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gin-contrib-cors - CORS
gin's middleware
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823376
Bug ID: 1823376
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gin-contrib-static -
Static middleware
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821158
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-click-help-colors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-freeipa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
--- Comment #2 from Antonio T. (sagitter) ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/simde
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823365
Bug ID: 1823365
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-ns3777k-shodan - Shodan
API client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807682
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-goftp-server
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822536
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Fabio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
--- Comment #7 from Artur Iwicki ---
Dropping an updated spec with unbundled surgescript.
spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/opensurge-0.5.1.2-3.spec
srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/opensurge-0.5.1.2-3.src.rpm
--
>Source1: CMakeLists.txt
>Why
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
Antonio T. (sagitter) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1823117
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823344
Bug ID: 1823344
Summary: Review Request: surgescript - Scripting language for
games
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1823344
--- Comment #6 from Artur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823134
--- Comment #7 from Artur Iwicki ---
I wanted to try and build the package locally, but I get a 404 when I try to
fetch the SRPM.
>Also, interestingly enough, if I don't have %global debug_package %{nil} at
>the top of the file, I get this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823319
Bug ID: 1823319
Summary: Review Request: python-django-pglocks - Context
managers for advisory locks for PostgreSQL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820799
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823151
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822536
--- Comment #4 from atgenautomat...@gmail.com ---
ATGEN A2 is 'free' upto max 10 managed nodes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
%changelog
* Mon Apr 13 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.1.5-1
- UPdate to latest upstream stream release 1.1.5 (rhbz#1820852)
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821826
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #44 from Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) ---
Hi Liming,
No, I am not using Fedora, I am using RHEL-8.1
(kernel-modules-extra-4.18.0-147.el8.aarch64).
> kernel-modules-extra-5.7.0-0.rc0.git8.1.fc33.x86_64
This output was from Honggang,
100 matches
Mail list logo
