https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Bluhm ---
Updated links:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sbluhm/nodejs/epel-8-x86_64/02467915-xpp3/xpp3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sbluhm/nodejs/e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991343
Matthieu Saulnier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991343
Bug ID: 1991343
Summary: Review Request: omemo-utils - Utilities for OMEMO
media sharing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Elliott Sales de Andrade has canceled Package
Review 's request for Elliott Sales de
Andrade 's needinfo:
Bug 1686307: Review Request: python-distributed - Distributed scheduler for
Dask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16863
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686307
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g |
|mail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723013
--- Comment #20 from Ben Beasley ---
Note that a source RPM built on Fedora 33 or 34 works just fine as an input for
a Rawhide mock build; there’s no expectation that your source RPM has to have a
“.fc35” (soon “.fc36”) in its name.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723013
--- Comment #19 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to b38ghk29 from comment #18)
> Please advise as to the current version of fedora core in use for package
> testing/review.
Reviews are generally done using Rawhide, the development version of Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e3a72947fc has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7cebef36b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-09198bbd59 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-09198bb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-589df368c0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-589df36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
--- Comment #6 from Georg Sauthoff ---
As I wrote in my initial posting:
> I started from a spec file generated by gem2rpm, but modified some
> fields/sections where necessary.
I revisited it again, the rspec build-requires comes from my mo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
--- Comment #5 from Georg Sauthoff ---
> Those are BuildRequires taken from gemspec, the maintainer should then decide
> what makes sense to be included and what does not ;)
Sure, but if a requirement is indeed superfluous on fedora, then ge
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
--- Comment #4 from Jarek Prokop ---
(In reply to Georg Sauthoff from comment #3)
> Hm, the summary is pretty much what upstream provides:
>
> rpm: Upload code to gist.github.com
> upstream: upload code to https://gist.github.com
>
> So thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991292
--- Comment #1 from Rémi Lauzier ---
pr that fix some end-of-line encoding problem
https://github.com/ArturKovacs/trash-rs/pull/33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991292
Rémi Lauzier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991292
Bug ID: 1991292
Summary: Review Request: rust-trash - Moving files and folders
to the Recycle Bin
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
--- Comment #3 from Georg Sauthoff ---
Hm, the summary is pretty much what upstream provides:
rpm: Upload code to gist.github.com
upstream: upload code to https://gist.github.com
So this is from the upstream readme/man page.
Whereas the up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860688
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(p...@kobol.org)
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #64 from Andy Mender ---
Apologies for the massive delay on this. I would mark armhfp and s390x as no-go
platforms and proceed as is. Unfortunately, virtualized hardware doesn't always
cut it and as far as I know, the armhfp builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888351
Bug 1888351 depends on bug 1888345, which changed state.
Bug 1888345 Summary: Review Request: python-hbmqtt - MQTT client/broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888345
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888345
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #21 from Andy Mend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887970
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
Jarek Prokop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jarek Pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982210
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/shutter.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/shutter-0.98-3.fc34.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Aug 08 2021 Martin Gansser - 0.98-3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Bluhm ---
Thank you for your feedback. I will incorporate the https in the next revision.
Homepage is indeed dead. there is an alternative github page but it is not
official. So I rather not put that.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e3a72947fc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e3a72947fc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-589df368c0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-589df368c0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7cebef36b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7cebef36b5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202
Didik Supriadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
Jarek Prokop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jpro...@redhat.com
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991208
Bug ID: 1991208
Summary: Review Request: pluma-plugins - Modules for the pluma
text editor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348932
Didik Supriadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|33 |rawhide
--- Comment #17 from Didik S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348932
Didik Supriadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202
Bug ID: 1991202
Summary: Review Request: xpp3 - XML Pull Parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991092
Sahana Prasad changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991092
Sahana Prasad changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
40 matches
Mail list logo