https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116257
Bug ID: 2116257
Summary: Review Request: python-flask-basicauth - HTTP basic
authentication for Flask
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116246
Bug ID: 2116246
Summary: Review Request: python-retry - Easy to use retry
decorator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993292
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3ae194d327 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3ae194d327
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116092
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2116220
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116220
Bug ID: 2116220
Summary: Review Request: rust-rustdct - Compute Discrete Cosine
Transforms (DCT) of any size in O(nlogn) time, in pure
Rust
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116219
Bug ID: 2116219
Summary: Review Request: python-roundrobin - Rather small
collection of round robin utilites
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d94cc5e711 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bismuth
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116087
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1)
> > Source1:http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > Source2:http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
>
> These are both wrong - they point
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d94cc5e711 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d94cc5e711
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105886
Bug 2105886 depends on bug 2105882, which changed state.
Bug 2105882 Summary: Review Request: rust-concolor-query - Look up colored
console capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105883
Bug 2105883 depends on bug 2105882, which changed state.
Bug 2105882 Summary: Review Request: rust-concolor-query - Look up colored
console capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077297
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116187
Bug ID: 2116187
Summary: Review Request: wrk - Modern HTTP benchmarking tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116084
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2103563
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115901
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wright ---
Implemented your suggestions.
Spec URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/ImHex.spec
SRPM URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/ImHex-1.20.0-3.fc37.src.rpm
Checked it in GS and it looks great
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096621
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? needinfo+|fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116083
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #2)
> URLs should be working now. It's coming in from deps for clamav, but I
> suspect all I may really need is primal-check for rustfft (the rest comes in
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116087
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115150
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wright ---
Fixed checksum issue and added proper validation of AppData metainfo.
Spec URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/cherrytree.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116103
--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Luna Jernberg from comment #2)
> Hey!
>
> Got all the extras background showing up with this package but the default
> wallpaper, did not get installed or changed at all
Simply install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wright ---
Fixed both items.
Spec URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/basez.spec
SRPM URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/basez-1.6.2-2.fc37.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116064
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wright ---
License issue and spec file mismatch fixed.
Spec URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/dfc.spec
SRPM URL: https://jonathanspw.fedorapeople.org/dfc-3.1.1-1.fc37.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116103
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075
--- Comment #6 from Benson Muite ---
Now a packager. Thanks for your comments Salman. Review:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112639
--- Comment #4 from Benson Muite ---
Updated:
spec:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/PTAstra-sans/fedora-36-x86_64/04709033-pt-astra-sans-fonts/PTAstraSans.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112636
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ngomp...@gmail.com |panem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112639
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite ---
Updated based on comments in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112636
spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075949
--- Comment #38 from Benson Muite ---
Many thanks for sponsorship. Did not want to clutter inboxes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116064
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100141
--- Comment #2 from MartinKG ---
Thanks for your coment:
> (...but I won't be able to set up an installation to actually test the
> plugin. That's not required by the review guidelines, though.)
That's correct.
New package:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
--- Comment #8 from Onuralp Sezer ---
Repo and branch requests are sent.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/46265
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/46266
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
Onuralp Sezer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(thunderbirdtr@gma |
|il.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116092
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116092
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
--- Comment #4 from Onuralp Sezer ---
I updated all, please do review.
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/bismuth/raw/main/f/bismuth.spec
SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/bismuth/raw/main/f/bismuth-3.1.2-1.fc36.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
Onuralp Sezer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(thunderbirdtr@gma |needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116103
Luna Jernberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||droidbit...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115150
--- Comment #7 from Benson Muite ---
Unofficial review:
Pointing to the documentation on what needs to be done to unorphan. A regular
review is needed.
When running fedora-review got the following:
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116103
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
46 matches
Mail list logo