https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142399
--- Comment #9 from Benson Muite ---
Can you also change
BuildRequires: lua-rpm-macros lua-srpm-macros
to
BuildRequires: lua-devel
As lua-devel will bring in lua-rpm-macros, lua-srpm-macros and lua,
you can also remove
BuildRequires: lua
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143140
--- Comment #1 from Peng Wu ---
The libpinyin package supports Berkeley DB and Kyoto Cabinet.
We add back the Kyoto Cabinet package, because we may need to switch to use
Kyoto Cabinet in the libpinyin package in future.
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d559f68df8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-26ea155e33 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992629
--- Comment #13 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Jakub, Thank you very much for your review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-69fb181ee2 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9325194c36 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992629
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
Scott K Logan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Fedora Pagure
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140709
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2138841
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140710
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2138841
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140707
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2138841
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140708
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2138841
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140708
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2138839
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138425
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143391
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143391
Bug ID: 2143391
Summary: Review Request: lua-utf8 - A UTF-8 support module for
Lua
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143391
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94247356
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142399
--- Comment #8 from Benson Muite ---
Ok. Will check. It seems lua-ev should build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/lua-ev/build/5043279/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143382
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143382
Bug ID: 2143382
Summary: Review Request: lua-luarepl - REPL.lua - a reusable
Lua REPL written in Lua
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143382
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94245986
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808895
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rsakeyfind
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808895
--- Comment #12 from Michal Ambroz ---
Thank you very much, it worked.
Package requested
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49157
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143056
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143351
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143351
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94243810
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143351
Bug ID: 2143351
Summary: Review Request: lua-vstruct - Lua library to
manipulate binary data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
--- Comment #10 from Wayne Sun ---
My bad, missing the last few parts with copy paste which include Requires and
Provides:
Source checksums
https://github.com/zheller/flake8-quotes/archive/3.3.1/flake8-quotes-3.3.1.tar.gz
:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4)
> I'm very sure that you're misremembering things here. MIT is indeed one of
> the licenses where full license text in redistributed sources is required.
> Addi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143314
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2143315
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143315
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Dep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143315
Bug ID: 2143315
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gtk4 - Ruby/GTK4 is a Ruby
binding of GTK+-4.x
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141038
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/synce4l
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643
--- Comment #31 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lite-xl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143314
Bug ID: 2143314
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gdk4 - Ruby/GDK4 is a Ruby
binding of GDK-4.x
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-yeslogic-fontconfig-sys
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143311
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y...@znie.org
--- Comment #1 from Kale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066122
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143311
Bug ID: 2143311
Summary: Review Request: rust-libadwaita - Rust bindings for
libadwaita
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141038
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Lichvar ---
Thank you.
I've submitted an upstream PR for the unused-direct-shlib-dependency issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141038
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
It's also a good practice to review the provides, requires and buildrequires,
especially considering many are autogenerated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143005
Tom Rix changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(benson_muite@emai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
> Rpmlint
> ---
> Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Could you please run rpmlint manually on the spec, srpm and built rpm?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143005
Tom Rix changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142653
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Updated the spec file to run smoke test during %check
Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94240167
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140316
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package requires R-core.
- If your application is a C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142399
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #5)
> Please also update the license, it should be Apache-2.0 see
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> LicensingGuidelines/#_valid_license_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142399
--- Comment #6 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #4)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
>
>
>
> =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
--- Comment #7 from Wayne Sun ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #6)
> > The package is build with wheel so I've marked following as not applicable:
> > [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
> > proc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
> The package is build with wheel so I've marked following as not applicable:
> [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
> process.
Read this as: "Nothing can download any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141871
--- Comment #5 from Wayne Sun ---
Here is the result with run fedora-review combined with manual review.
I don't find more issues.
The %changelog part of update with spec change does follow the fedora guide on
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142399
--- Comment #5 from Benson Muite ---
Please also update the license, it should be Apache-2.0 see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_valid_license_short_names
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684603
--- Comment #32 from Benson Muite ---
Some rpmlint warnings:
$ rpmlint bCNC-0.9.14.52~20221017git523f1ec7-4.fc38.src.rpm
rpmlint session starts
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
> all the fonts have a hardcoded data path [1].
> The solution to this would to either symlink the fonts into place or
> patch the code.
Then I guess it is easiest to just keep it as is and install them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142399
--- Comment #4 from Benson Muite ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141038
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/synce4l.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/tmp/synce4l-0-3.20221114gitca51d5.fc38.src.rpm
This is an update to the latest git snapshot, w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142006
--- Comment #11 from François Cami ---
I can generate them, it's a sed away in the build directory:
$ sed -i s/GENERATE_MAN.*/GENERATE_MAN\ =\ YES/g Doxyfile.docs-vsg
However:
* the package ships no binaries
* "make install" does not install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643
--- Comment #29 from Jan Drögehoff ---
(In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #28)
> Not really. I mean, can we depend on these packages?
>
> $ rpm -ql jetbrains-mono-fonts |grep JetBrainsMono-Regular
> /usr/share/fonts/jetbrains-mon
65 matches
Mail list logo