https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 from gil c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Bug 1005782 depends on bug 1005779, which changed state.
Bug 1005779 Summary: Review Request: uima-parent-pom - Apache UIMA Parent POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005779
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #10)
> The licensing should be fine according to the response i got from legal
> mailing-list.
Thanks!
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - missing BR on ant-apache-regexp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #10 from Michael Simacek ---
The licensing should be fine according to the response i got from legal
mailing-list.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1025904 (solr)
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #8)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #6)
> > > Few issues before doing in-depth review:
> > > be ASL 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #6)
> Few issues before doing in-depth review:
> - icons are licensed under BSD (according to LICENSE file) -> License should
> be ASL 2.0 and BSD
maybe ASL 2.0 or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek ---
Few issues before doing in-depth review:
- icons are licensed under BSD (according to LICENSE file) -> License should be
ASL 2.0 and BSD
- there is a NOTICE file, which could possibly affect packages lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1005778 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Bug 1005782 depends on bug 1005778, which changed state.
Bug 1005778 Summary: Review Request: uima-build-resources - Apache UIMA Build
Resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005778
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
- remove uima-build-resources references
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/uimaj-2.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.5.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msima...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051536
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
Sreenadha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sreenadharedd...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||apache, uimaj
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1005792
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005782
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1005779, 1005778
--
You are receiving
28 matches
Mail list logo
