https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
Sorry, typo.
Its URL is:
http://blosc.pydata.org
OR
https://github.com/FrancescAlted/python-blosc
as described on its github page.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Another note is that filtering out python sitearch libs is not required from
Fedora 20, you don't need to do this anymore.
I suggest that you should remove this in master branch in SCM, but leave it in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Thibault North changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #4 from Thibault Nor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Chris
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #6 from Thibault North ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> DO NOT CHANGE THE BUG STATUS IF YOU DON'T KNOW.
>
> Will review later.
Hey, I didn't want to change that ?! No clue how it happend... sorry for that.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
I'm not sure if it's the problem of mirrors, but mock can't find blosc now with
Error: No Package found for blosc-devel although it's already imported.
I will re run the review later, please wait.
Tha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Bug 1020096 depends on bug 1020088, which changed state.
Bug 1020088 Summary: Review Request: blosc - A high performance compressor
optimized for binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020088
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng ---
Just clean the cache dir of mock and now it works.
Package Review(with cut)
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #9 from Thibault North ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #8)
> [snap]
> Issues:
> ===
> - Permissions on files are set properly.
> Note: See rpmlint output
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Thibault North from comment #9)
> > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/blosc/blosc_extension.so 0775L
> It looks like .so files in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ also are 0755.
Read aga
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #11 from Thibault North ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
> (In reply to Thibault North from comment #9)
> > > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/blosc/blosc_extension.so 0775L
>
> > It looks like .so files in /usr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #13 from Thibault North ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #12)
> Rebuild with commented filter line on rawhide, fedora-review is quiet.
>
> So from F20 we don't need this anymore, but lower than f20 should have this
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Thibault North changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-blosc-1.1-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blosc-1.1-7.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020096
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
25 matches
Mail list logo
