https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #31 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
fusionforge-5.3.2-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fusionforge-5.3.2-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Sylvain Beucler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #28 from Sy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #26 from Sylvain Beucler ---
Here we go, same URLs but update spec:
http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge-5.3.50+201410241700-1.fc20.src.rpm
http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge.spec
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter ---
Per Version: , I guess this option may also be strictly acceptable (omits, the
'+'),
Version: 5.3.50.201410241700
But I think it follows at least the spirit of the NamingGuidelines to put it
into the Rele
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter ---
So? That Version includes a non-numeric character, which is something not
allowed. Per the guideline I referenced,
"If the version is non-numeric (contains tags that are not numbers), you may
need to inclu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #23 from Sylvain Beucler ---
The upstream version I packaged is 5.3.50+201410241700:
http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/snapshots/fusionforge-5.3.50+201410241700.tar.bz2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter ---
That Version: tag doesn't seem to comply with
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines
which is pretty clear that Version: tag should not contain non-numeric items
(like a '+')
If you want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #21 from Sylvain Beucler ---
Here we go:
http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge-5.3.50+201410241700-1.fc20.src.rpm
http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel ---
Yep, packaging is all fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #19 from Sylvain Beucler ---
I'm going to remove the RDF plugins from the Fedora packaging.
Is the packaging otherwise alright, so we avoid another round-trip?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel ---
(In reply to Sylvain Beucler from comment #17)
> For the dependencies, fusionforge-web now depends on the php-simplepie and
> php-nusoap packages.
>
> The 'php-snoopy' code was replaced by php's curl.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #17 from Sylvain Beucler ---
For the dependencies, fusionforge-web now depends on the php-simplepie and
php-nusoap packages.
The 'php-snoopy' code was replaced by php's curl.
I'm not sure if you request that all libraries we ship
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #16 from Sylvain Beucler ---
I'm out of town for the commit week so this will have to wait.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #13 from Sylvain Beucler ---
(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #9)
> Sorry it took so long and thanks for the patience.
>
> Reviewing a package of this complexity requires some extra setup, especially
> as you seem to do ve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel ---
(In reply to Thorsten Glaser from comment #10)
> (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #9)
>
> > Some tips:
> > * Do _NOT_ assume database is running
> > * Do not fail under any circumstances
>
> Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck ---
(In reply to Thorsten Glaser from comment #10)
> Either a working PostgreSQL instance is available for installation,
> or the installation MUST fail.
I think Lubomir means that the %post scriptlet is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@mirbsd.org
--- Comment #10 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lrin...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #8 from Sylvain Beucler ---
From IRC conversation today, I understand that there are 2 issues remaining:
- Don't disable Python byte-compilation
I manually referenced the wrapper/conf dir with the .py files, so now the
.pyc/.po
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #7 from Sylvain Beucler ---
Ping? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #6 from Sylvain Beucler ---
I had forgotten the README about relaunch the post-install scripts - sorry
about that. It's in now.
Spec URL: http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fusionforge.fus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #5 from Sylvain Beucler ---
As promised, the fixed package:
Spec URL: http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge-5.3.50+201409251741-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #4 from Sylvain Beucler ---
Hi Lubomir!
> 0.) You seem to be packaging a version that does not exist?
Yes, we revamped the whole build system for the next release, and this is why
we now have a decent .spec file to propose.
I su
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel ---
5.) rpmlint is very unhappy.
There are definitely some false positives, but also things that need to be
looked into:
fusionforge.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C collaborative development tool
fusio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel ---
0.) You seem to be packaging a version that does not exist?
At https://fusionforge.org/frs/?group_id=6 the latest release seems to be
5.3.2. If you're packaging a pre-release version you should have a go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #1 from
35 matches
Mail list logo
