https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #33 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
hyperrogue-8.3-2.j.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-beb538eef6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/hyperrogue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #30 from Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #29 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Concerning SDL2, I simply don't know. I'm not at all a c/c++ dev :p
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #28 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
I have just noticed the savepng file is under zlib, I added it as a bundled
lib, and update the license tag.
I have updated the previous link.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #27 from Igor Gnatenko ---
is it possible by any chance to port it to SDL2?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #26 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-8.3-2.j.fc25.src.rpm
Hi, thank you very much for taking this review :)
I have updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@cicku.me |rosser@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #23 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Just setted up a corp repository for hyperrogue:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nobrakal/hyperrogue/
Feel free to use it to try hyperrogue without any pain ;)
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #22 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-8.3-1.j.fc24.src.rpm
Hi Rémi, thank you for your link !
I have updated my package t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Rémi Verschelde changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rversche...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
nobra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1364745 (FE-GAMESIG)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #20 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-7.4-1.h.fc23.src.rpm
Updated to new upstream.
Now, I force the code relocation with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #19 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Updated, all will work now, sorry
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #18 from Christopher Meng ---
Uh...
Please upload your SRPM within stable network, the source RPM doesn't include
spec file!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #17 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-6.6-1.fc22.src.rpm
I've updated my spec to fix some typo, and force the use of the -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #16 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-6.6-0.fc22.src.rpm
I updated to the new upstream (6.6), and created a subpackage for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #15 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-5.5-0.3.a.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #11 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL http://cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue-5.5a-2.fc21.src.rpm
I followed your instructions:
- Compile with right flag (I think, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See: ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #9 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
I've updated my package.
http://cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue-5.5a-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue.spec
And, great news, I can patch the source code (well, it's not very beau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #7 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-4.4-4.fc21.src.rpm
Hi,
Thank you for your help :)
1. "If linker works well, no need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #5 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Hi, I moved the Spec and the SRPM to fedorapeople.org
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-4.4-3.fc21.src.rpm
I also ran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #4 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue-4.4-3.fc21.src.rpm
Hi,
Thank you again for your response!
I reported the font bug to upstream. I quote him "Thank
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram ---
right, just write the appdata, include it in source, install it in the
appropriate location and you are done. example,
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnome-photos.git/tree/gnome-photos.spec
If you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #2 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: cthugha.org/fedora/hyperrogue-4.4-2.fc21.src.rpm
Hi,
Thank you very much for your review :)
I will report the font problem shortly.
Comment d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||methe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fr
34 matches
Mail list logo
