https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #30 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
Just want to redirect people to
https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/686#issuecomment-87199448 which has the
latest updates of the wip rpm with links.
I guess it would be great if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Bug 1169966 depends on bug 1174030, which changed state.
Bug 1174030 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-appc-spec - Schema defs and
tools for app container specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174030
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Iago López i...@endocode.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@endocode.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #28 from Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com ---
Ok, we should do this i nthe start of the daemon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #26 from Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com ---
Awesome.
Lokesh just have Rocket require supermin, and then run supermin in post install
or in its init file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #27 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com ---
You want to do it on start, not in %post, because otherwise a new systemd or
glibc RPM would require yum reinstall rocket or the like, which would be
awkward (and wouldn't work on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #21 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Tom spot Callaway from comment #20)
1) Add a README.fedora that points to the latest Fedora image and let the
user figure it out AND/OR Include a script to download the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #22 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #21)
If I'm reading this right, this option still _does not_ allow me to include
the fedora image in the srpm but leave it to the user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||walt...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #24 from Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com ---
Sounds like a great solution. can we break supermin out of kibguestfs, or just
make Rocket require it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #25 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com ---
It's already a separate tool. Just need to patch rocket to use it on startup.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #19 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
# rkt fetch
https://github.com/coreos/etcd/releases/download/v0.5.0-alpha.4/etcd-v0.5.0-alpha.4-linux-amd64.aci
Downloading aci: [=== ] 3.01
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #20 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
I don't think that mkrootfs.sh is going to work.
A) There is no networking in the koji runtime instances, so it can't download
anything, even from koji.
B) Including that binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1148704 |1174030
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #14 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
%changelog
* Sun Dec 14 2014 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.1-1
- use upstream v0.1.1
- mkrootfs uses fedora docker base image from koji
via Václav Pavlin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #15 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #14)
Not sure yet if koji will find the koji base image via the URL, else it'll
have to be included in the SRPM itself.
You will have to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #16 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Kushal Das from comment #15)
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #14)
Not sure yet if koji will find the koji base image via the URL, else it'll
have to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #17 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
I think you will have to open a FESCo ticket CCing rel-eng for the same. I
guess they block these accesses due to security reasons.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Bug 1169966 depends on bug 1148704, which changed state.
Bug 1148704 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto -
Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Tomas Tomecek ttome...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ttome...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #10 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Tomecek from comment #9)
Wanted to give rocket a shot, so I made your spec a source of information;
couple points:
* latest build of go-bindata is 0.0.6, while
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #11 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #7)
Maybe we could try a fedora rootfs instead, but no idea how well that'd
work, also gotta check with upstream about that (if we're to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #12 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com ---
As I had mentioned:
An important point to clarify is that two things were announced:
1. a spec (App Container)
https://github.com/coreos/rocket/blob/master/app-container/SPEC.md
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #13 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Timothy St. Clair from comment #12)
As I had mentioned:
An important point to clarify is that two things were announced:
1. a spec (App Container)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1148704
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #4)
I think
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-
built_binaries_or_libraries applies to the PXE image in Source1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #7 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Tom spot Callaway from comment #6)
Do I want to know why this package needs an entire prebuilt PXE image of
another Linux distribution?
From what I've gathered as yet,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #1 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
I opened https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/173 for the 'init' binary
name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com ---
init is installed in %{_libexecdir}/rocket/stage1 as per issue URL in Comment
1.
Spec and SRPM updated, links are same as in Comment 0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
37 matches
Mail list logo
