https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora
22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.\nIf you want to test the u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc22 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15919
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
rhythmbox-ampache-0-0.5.20150518git7415a69.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15912
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #13 from Juan Ort
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #12 from Juan Orti ---
Thank you.
This is the package with the debug disabled:
Spec URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-ampache/rhythmbox-ampache.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-ampache/rhythmbox-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Pet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #10 from Pete Walter ---
It fails to build:
error: Empty %files file
/builddir/build/BUILD/rhythmbox-ampache-7415a69d019da8cf973cfb9e1727156ad901e7c1/debugfiles.list
Probably needs something like '%global debug_package %{nil}' to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #9 from Juan Orti ---
Ok, here is the arched package. I have also used the new Python macros:
Spec URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-ampache/rhythmbox-ampache.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-amp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #8 from Pete Walter ---
Yes, I would say so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #7 from Juan Orti ---
(In reply to Pete Walter from comment #6)
> No, it expands _libdir during build time and depending on which builder it
> happened to be built on, the final rpm is going to have either
> /usr/lib/rhythmbox/plug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #6 from Pete Walter ---
No, it expands _libdir during build time and depending on which builder it
happened to be built on, the final rpm is going to have either
/usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins or /usr/lib64/rhythmbox/plugins hardcoded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #5 from Juan Orti ---
(In reply to Pete Walter from comment #4)
> (In reply to Juan Orti from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Pete Walter from comment #2)
> > > 2) you install files to %{_libdir}/rhythmbox/plugins/ampache, yet the
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #4 from Pete Walter ---
(In reply to Juan Orti from comment #3)
> (In reply to Pete Walter from comment #2)
> > 2) you install files to %{_libdir}/rhythmbox/plugins/ampache, yet the
> > package is marked as noarch. noarch packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #3 from Juan Orti ---
(In reply to Pete Walter from comment #2)
> Looks good to me, except for two things:
>
> 1) how did you determine it is GPLv2-only and not GPLv2+ or even GPL+? I
> can't find any notes in the source code and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #2 from Pete Walter ---
Looks good to me, except for two things:
1) how did you determine it is GPLv2-only and not GPLv2+ or even GPL+? I can't
find any notes in the source code and it includes the standard GPL license text
file w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
--- Comment #1 from Juan Orti ---
I've updated the SPEC and created a copr repository:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jorti/rhythmbox-ampache/
Spec URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-ampache/rhythmbox-ampache.spec
SRPM URL:
h
24 matches
Mail list logo
