https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #7 from Adam Miller ---
(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #5)
> Note: I don't know why my rpmlist didn't understand ghost files, but I left
> those in.
>
> Need to Fix:
> - License file LICENSE is marked
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #8 from Adam Miller ---
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin-1.1-2.git.0.ac7a99a.fc23.src.rpm
Fixed %dir listing for sdn.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #6 from Adam Miller ---
(In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #3)
> So the 330 bundled provides make me sad at the idea of maintaining a stable
> version and bug fixes, but I guess since guidelines have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #10 from Michael Scherer ---
- Also, there is a missing deps on procps-ng in the sdn-ovs subpackage,
required for sysctl, and since procps-ng is not installed by default in a
docker container, I think it should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #14 from Adam Miller ---
For the sake of posterity, I did include improvements based on feedback from
Michael Scherer.
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/origin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer ---
- So, there is no license file for the redistribuable clients (since it doesn't
requires anything). Same got for the master rpm, since it doesn't pull the
origin rpm.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer ---
Also, since openshift-sdn-multitenant-setup.sh create a directory
/etc/openshift-sdn and a file config.env, I think it would be nice to have them
owned by the subpackage.
So on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #12 from Adam Miller ---
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin-1.1-3.git.0.ac7a99a.fc23.src.rpm
Fixed %dir listing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
--- Comment #2 from Adam Miller ---
I was uner the impression that kubernetes package was using the bundled version
of kubernetes inside the openshift source in the Godeps as it's source, which
is upstream kubernetes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
Colin Walters changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||walt...@redhat.com
15 matches
Mail list logo