[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2016-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller --- (In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #5) > Note: I don't know why my rpmlist didn't understand ghost files, but I left > those in. > > Need to Fix: > - License file LICENSE is marked

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #8 from Adam Miller --- Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin.spec SRPM URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin-1.1-2.git.0.ac7a99a.fc23.src.rpm Fixed %dir listing for sdn. -- You

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #6 from Adam Miller --- (In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #3) > So the 330 bundled provides make me sad at the idea of maintaining a stable > version and bug fixes, but I guess since guidelines have

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #10 from Michael Scherer --- - Also, there is a missing deps on procps-ng in the sdn-ovs subpackage, required for sysctl, and since procps-ng is not installed by default in a docker container, I think it should be

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #14 from Adam Miller --- For the sake of posterity, I did include improvements based on feedback from Michael Scherer. Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/origin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer --- - So, there is no license file for the redistribuable clients (since it doesn't requires anything). Same got for the master rpm, since it doesn't pull the origin rpm. -

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer --- Also, since openshift-sdn-multitenant-setup.sh create a directory /etc/openshift-sdn and a file config.env, I think it would be nice to have them owned by the subpackage. So on

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #12 from Adam Miller --- Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin.spec SRPM URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/origin-1.1-3.git.0.ac7a99a.fc23.src.rpm Fixed %dir listing for

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tdaw...@redhat.com

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 --- Comment #2 from Adam Miller --- I was uner the impression that kubernetes package was using the bundled version of kubernetes inside the openshift source in the Godeps as it's source, which is upstream kubernetes.

[Bug 1287822] Review Request: origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat

2015-12-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Colin Walters changed: What|Removed |Added CC||walt...@redhat.com