[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- python-recommonmark-0.4.0-4.git7ca5247.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- python-recommonmark-0.4.0-4.git7ca5247.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- python-recommonmark-0.4.0-4.git7ca5247.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #23 from Julien Enselme --- > Sorry for the delay with answer. No problem. > All issues addressed. Package APPROVED. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-recommonmark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- python-recommonmark-0.4.0-4.git7ca5247.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3c73fc30e7 --- Comment #26

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- python-recommonmark-0.4.0-4.git7ca5247.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3c73fc30e7 -- You are

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Pavel Alexeev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #20 from Pavel Alexeev --- SRPM url incorrect. It is very bad practice make changes without touch changelog and bump version (release). And until it is not imported in Fedora I look at that now. But please,

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #21 from Julien Enselme --- > SRPM url incorrect. Sorry about that. > It is very bad practice make changes without touch changelog and bump version > (release). And until it is not imported in Fedora I look at

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #14) > > According to logs its at least does not fail: > > + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test > > But according to the logs, it doesn't launch

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #16 from Julien Enselme --- > Does run nothing but require addition dependency? :) > docutil mentioned as dep even in setup.py from pupi tarball. It isn't a build deps in the SPEC so when you try to run the

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev --- Now it fails to test because you forgot add python2-CommonMark and python3-CommonMark as BuildRequires: + cd recommonmark-7ca5247b342e755ce5294d43b5fef68afd90028e + py.test-3.4 .

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev --- You should also include %check section and do not include license separate from upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #10 from Julien Enselme --- > Possible you are right and it may be equal... Is not? As far as I know it is equal. The package wouldn't pull python3-devel in the other case. I just prefer to put every requires in

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #7) > > Why binaries placed ony in python3 package? > > The python2 and python3 binaries should work the same. According to the > guidelines,

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hubbitus's scratch build of python-recommonmark-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 failed

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #10) > > You should also include %check section > > Since there is no test, I don't think it is relevant. Why you think so? According to

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #14 from Julien Enselme --- > According to logs its at least does not fail: > + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test But according to the logs, it doesn't launch any tests. So I don't see the point of launching it.

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hubbitus's scratch build of python-recommonmark-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #7 from Julien Enselme --- > Why binaries placed ony in python3 package? The python2 and python3 binaries should work the same. According to the guidelines, I may add them in only one package, the python3 one if

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hubbitus's scratch build of python-recommonmark-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Pavel Alexeev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review?

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev --- Why binaries placed ony in python3 package? Package Review == Legend: [+] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [x] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items =

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme --- Just updated: SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-recommonmark.spec SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-recommonmark-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Pavel Alexeev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme --- Nice catch, thanks. I just updated the spec file: - SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-recommonmark.spec - SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-recommonmark-0.2.0-2.fc23.src.rpm

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Sundeep Anand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suan...@redhat.com

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Bug 1288456 depends on bug 1288453, which changed state. Bug 1288453 Summary: Review Request: python-CommonMark - Python parser for the CommonMark Markdown spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453 What|Removed

[Bug 1288456] Review Request: python-recommonmark - docutils-compatibility bridge to CommonMark

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 Julien Enselme changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1288453