https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
R-RInside-0.2.13-1.el6, R-Rcpp-0.12.3-3.el6, R-highlight-0.4.7-1.el6,
R-inline-0.3.14-1.el6, R-littler-0.3.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
6 stable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
R-RInside-0.2.13-1.el7, R-Rcpp-0.12.3-3.el7, R-highlight-0.4.7-1.el7,
R-inline-0.3.14-1.el7, R-littler-0.3.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
7 stable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
R-RInside-0.2.13-1.el7, R-Rcpp-0.12.3-3.el7, R-highlight-0.4.7-1.el7,
R-inline-0.3.14-1.el7, R-littler-0.3.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
7 testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
R-RInside-0.2.13-1.el7 R-Rcpp-0.12.3-3.el7 R-littler-0.3.0-1.el7
R-inline-0.3.14-1.el7 R-highlight-0.4.7-1.el7 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
R-RInside-0.2.13-1.el6 R-Rcpp-0.12.3-3.el6 R-littler-0.3.0-1.el6
R-inline-0.3.14-1.el6 R-highlight-0.4.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23, R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc22, R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora
22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #8)
> (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #5)
> > I did *not* want it to be labeled as %doc.
> >
> > What I meant to say was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23, R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #8 from José Matos ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #5)
> I did *not* want it to be labeled as %doc.
>
> What I meant to say was "fedora-review warning was bogus". It was clear to
> me when I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R-inline
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23 R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5c7fbfc747
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23 R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5c7fbfc747
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #2)
>
> For me this package installs correctly when running the installation test in
> fedora-review. The review.txt file contains
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #1)
> I have a couple of questions. Please see below.
Many thanks for reviewing. I will try to answer your questions.
> Issues:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #1)
> >
> > - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
> >
> > ---> I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #2)
> (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #1)
> > I have a couple of questions. Please see below.
>
> Many thanks for reviewing. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #1 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I have a couple of questions. Please see below.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1305335
27 matches
Mail list logo