https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #97 from Rick Tierney ---
Ok, I guess I close this BZ.
Thanks for all of your help!
Rick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #96 from Michal Schmidt ---
I don't know. Try asking on the devel mailing list
(de...@lists.fedoraproject.org).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #95 from Rick Tierney ---
Ok. Is there anyway to configure Koji to permanently use our proxy regardless
of whether we call koji directly or if it's called by fedpkg?
I looked at the /etc/koji.conf file but didn't see any proxy ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #94 from Michal Schmidt ---
> Maybe ssh accounts on fedorapeople.org could be used for that?
Ah, no, because no private keys are allowed on fedorapeople.org.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #91 from Michal Schmidt ---
That's likely due to a firewall at Intel.
I replied to Rick in private with some advice (the whole world does not need to
know the details, such as internal hostnames).
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #90 from Doug Ledford ---
OK, there's something wrong in your ssh config or else there is something
blocking ssh. Can you ssh to other machines? What if you remove your password
from your ssh key? Is it possible your ssh-agent i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #89 from Rick Tierney ---
I tried to clone using fedpkg again; this is the error I'm getting:
[rjtierne@phbppriv13 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg clone opa-fmgui
Cloning into 'opa-fmgui'...
ssh: connect to host pkgs.fedoraproject.org port 22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Doug Ledford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? needinfo? |
--- Comment #88 from Doug Ledford --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #87 from Rick Ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #86 from Rick Ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #85 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/opa-fmgui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #84 from Rick Tierney ---
Hi Michal:
It wasn't clear what URL to put in that field so I put the wrong value there; I
will try again! Thanks!
Rick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #80 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #79)
> Thank you Rick. You're approved as a sponsor now
Correction: s/sponsor/packager/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #74 from Rick Tierney ---
Okay Jarod, thanks! I do have the e-mail rick.tier...@intel.com set on both
the Fedora and Bugzilla accounts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #73 from Jarod Wilson ---
Your bugzilla login doesn't need to match the FAS login, it needs to match the
email address on file with FAS tied to your login. Bugzilla login usernames are
generally (always) email addresses, FAS uses u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #71 from Rick Tierney ---
(In reply to Rick Tierney from comment #70)
> (In reply to Neil Horman from comment #68)
> > Additionally, what is your fedora account user name? It needs to be the
> > same as your bugzilla account, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #70 from Rick Tierney ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #68)
> Additionally, what is your fedora account user name? It needs to be the
> same as your bugzilla account, but I don't seem to find it.
This is strange! My acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #60 from Rick Tierney ---
Great! It was a long road, but I'm glad it's done!
Thanks to everyone for all of your help!
Rick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |fedora-review+
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #57 from Rick Tierney ---
Thanks Doug, that's a great explanation!
I followed Option 1 and saw that the documentation was copied to
/usr/share/doc/opa-fmgui and the licenses were copied to
/usr/share/licenses/opa-fmgui. After re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #56 from Doug Ledford ---
Looking at your spec file, you are placing your license files and other
non-runtime files in your runtime java directory. I don't know if that's
standard or not. But there are a couple ways of solving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #54 from Rick Tierney ---
I see! Yes I do have /usr/share/java/opa-fmgui under %files... so that's why
the duplicates. I will revise this and try again. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #53 from Doug Ledford ---
(In reply to Rick Tierney from comment #52)
> Neil:
>
> Now that you have run the review (which seems slightly different from the
> way I do), I can see where some things are wrong and some things I'm not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #52 from Rick Tierney ---
Neil:
Now that you have run the review (which seems slightly different from the way I
do), I can see where some things are wrong and some things I'm not sure why
they're being flagged:
1. - Package does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #51 from Neil Horman ---
Looks pretty good, a few minor nits and I think we're good to go.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Iss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #49 from Neil Horman ---
I'm not sure what problem you ran into but its working fine for me. I've
closed your new bz as a dup of this one, and will continue the review here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #48 from Neil Horman ---
*** Bug 1348668 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #46 from Rick Tierney ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/01org/opa-fmgui/releases/download/v1.4/opa-fmgui.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/01org/opa-fmgui/releases/download/v1.4/opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-4.fc25.src.rpm
Description: The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #45 from Rick Ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #44 from Jarod Wilson ---
dnf localinstall opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-3.fc25.noarch.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1162275 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #42 from Don Dutile ---
+1 to what Jarod said.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #41 from Jarod Wilson ---
"Requires" means "you cannot install this package without this/these packages
already installed, unless you force it". That is 100% by design. That's what we
have things like yum and dnf for -- they automa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert.am...@intel.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #38 from Rick Tierney ---
Sorry Neil I didn't mean to imply you didn't know what jar files were. I was
just trying to get to the bottom of the misunderstanding.
In any case, I understand your point of view and I will attempt to in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #34 from Neil Horman ---
Well, just to be clear, what I'm saying is that both the binaries and the
licenses should be removed, so you're not really using the 3rd party jar file
at all. The only exception is the gritty jar file, fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #33 from Rick Tierney ---
Thanks Neil! I will review this with our Legal team but it sounds like we
should remove the 3rd party jar files after we build opa-fmgui and get rid of
the licenses altogether. This surprises me a little
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #32 from Neil Horman ---
Rick, ideally it would be better if you just removed the libraries that you are
pulling in via build requires from the project alltogether, but given that the
license tag is supposed to apply to the binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1162001 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #27 from Rick Tierney ---
Great, I'm glad that we cleared that up! We don't have immediate plans to
replace gritty, but it is likely that we will implement our own version of this
functionality in the future.
Thanks!
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #25 from Rick Tierney ---
Created attachment 1162001
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1162001&action=edit
opa-fmgui spec file
I'm a bit unsure of your use of the term "incorporations", so let me clarify...
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #26 from Neil Horman ---
oh, you're right, my bad. I saw the license issues you put up and assumed you
were using them direct from your project. You're good on hibernate and
jfreechart
As for gritty, I concur with your approach.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #24 from Neil Horman ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #23 from Rick Ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #22 from Rick Tierney ---
I started researching the issue this morning, and in addition to the link you
sent, I believe there is some evidence that it can be done; but I will have to
run some tests to see if I can get this working.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(robert.amato@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #20 from Rick Tierney ---
The classpath is needed for dependency resolution at run-time, whereas maven
and ant are build tools only used at compile-time. I don't currently have a
solution for the removal of the Class-Path field fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #19 from Neil Horman ---
The URL tag is a bit arbitrary. rpmlint flags it for various conditions, but
just pointing it to a wiki page for the project should be sufficient.
For the source URL you should be able to tag a version o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #18 from Rick Tierney ---
Thanks, that works!
Ok, so I have a few issues I'll need help with...
Rpmlint (4 warnings)
-
1. The URL tag is supposed to point to a public web site where we have
documentation, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
|l.com) needinfo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #16 from Rick Ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rick.tier...@intel.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #14 from Honggang LI ---
Robert, any update? thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #13 from Neil Horman ---
What you need to do is go through the code and determine which code is licensed
in which way. Your spec file indicates its all BSD, but the docs in the source
tarball indicate their are multiple licenses.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #12 from robert.am...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #6)
>
> This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
> also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
> - Add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(robert.amato@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #11 from robert.am...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #10)
> Please fix those issues pointed out by Neil.
Will do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #10 from Honggang LI ---
Please fix those issues pointed out by Neil.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
robert.am...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(robert.amato@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #7 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #6)
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
> names).
> [!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
>
> Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #6 from Neil Horman ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(robert.amato@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #5 from Neil Horman ---
perfect, thank you! I'll run the review now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
robert.am...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
|l.com)
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
