https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7c6969bdc6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-7bf4bd5611
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a749e2d8e4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b3a627bbae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/modulemd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #11)
> I will add it there later when it will actually work.
>
> > 2) with the new upstream release I can't see modlint now
>
> ???
>
Just looked into modul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #11 from Miroslav Suchý ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #10)
> Few things I want to note here
>
> 1) python_provide macro is not used which I think is available on all Fedora
> as well as EPEL6+
As of today on Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/modulemd.spec
SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #8 from Petr Šabata ---
1.0.1 released :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata ---
Just released the first stable release.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/modulemd/1.0.0
Note this is incompatible with the development releases that COPR probably
relies on.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata ---
I'll incorporate some long-planned changes and do a proper "1.0" release within
the next week or two. This will break the API and will affect COPR (among
other things), so we'll discuss it some more.
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #4)
> @Miroslav, I'd actually vote for postponing official packaging until there's
> a stable release with a stable API. That might happen once we decide how to
> pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata ---
Thanks for the feedback, I'll reflect it in the SPEC file at some point.
@Miroslav, I'd actually vote for postponing official packaging until there's a
stable release with a stable API. That might happen o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #2)
> (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
> > 1) Python packaging guidelines recommends usage of macros
> > %{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{name}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
> 1) Python packaging guidelines recommends usage of macros
> %{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{name}}
> %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{nam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) Python packaging guidelines recommends usage of macros
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{name}}
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{name}}
Can they be not used in this package spec?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
27 matches
Mail list logo
