[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Tomáš Korbař changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #20 from Tomáš K

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Tomáš Korbař changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Referenced Bug

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Tomáš Korbař changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tomas.k...@seznam.cz|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are r

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Tomáš Korbař changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-04-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Tomáš Korbař changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tomas.k...@seznam.cz -- You are recei

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-04-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #19 from Tomáš Korbař --- For speedup you can give +karma on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f244a84f25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-04-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #18 from Tomáš Korbař --- Created attachment 1425672 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1425672&action=edit Patch for unbundle tomsfastmath This patch will unbundle tomsfastmath. -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-04-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #17 from Tomáš Korbař --- Created attachment 1425670 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1425670&action=edit Patch for unbundle libtomcrypt This patch will unbundle tomcrypt from pixiewps. The file left in tc folde

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2018-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Tomáš Korbař changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tomas.k...@seznam.cz --- Comment #16 f

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #15 from Leandro Costa --- Done, I've changed the version to 1.2.2 to match the value printed by the program and the value in version.h, and add the timestamp of the git checkout to Release field. The new links: Spec URL: http:/

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #14 from Leandro Costa --- Ok, so I'm going to read the documentation on the post-release versioning as you said it's the correct to do, and change the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt --- There is version.mk and src/version.h with different versions inside. The former says "1.2" release "3". The latter says "1.2" and "1.2.2". The latter is what is printed by the program itself.

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #12 from Leandro Costa --- Hi, I was reading the wiki in order to understand the versioning... now I'm more confused, on the git repository the last release is 1.2.2 from 2016-01-04, but I'm packing the git version, so... Should I

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt --- Anything in reply to comment 4? v1.2.2 is from January 2016. This checkout from git master is also v1.2.2 not v1.2, $ grep _VER pixiewps-master/src/version.h #define SHORT_VERSION "1.2" #defi

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #10 from Leandro Costa --- Fixed the use of macros on the changelog. The new links: Spec URL: http://dev.leandrocosta.pro.br/fedora/pixiewps/pixiewps.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.leandrocosta.pro.br/fedora/pixiewps/pixiewps-1.2-6.fc

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #9 from Leandro Costa --- Me again, this time I've changed the spec file to use the %make_install macro since I was doing it manually. And passed the src directory as parameter to %make and %make_install. Here the new Links, I beli

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2017-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #8 from Leandro Costa --- Hi again, I've updated the package with a patch I've made myself, fixing the double DSTDIR on the Makefile. I'm applying the patch using the macro %patch0 as suggested at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt --- > added the option -q for silent running because rpmlint was complaining. Hmmm. Just don't only try to please rpmlint. Decide yourself whether what rpmlint suggests is helpful or not. The setup-not-qu

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #6 from Leandro Costa --- Hello again, I did some changes on the spec file, using the %setup macro on the prep section as suggested, and added the option -q for silent running because rpmlint was complaining. My previous use of S

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt --- Things you may want to look into: | %prep | %setup -n pixiewps-master The %setup macro will extract the source archive automatically (also if you stick to the .zip file instead of a .tgz). The -

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt --- > Source1: README.md > Source2: LICENSE.md ??? > rm -rf pixiewps-master README.md LICENSE.md > unzip -q %{_sourcedir}/master.zip > cp %{_sourcedir}/pixiewps-master/README.md . > cp %{_sourcedir}/pixie

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #3 from Leandro Costa --- Hello, I've fixed the problemns pointed by Michael Schwendt. Here the new links to the files: Spec URL: http://dev.leandrocosta.pro.br/fedora/pixiewps/pixiewps.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.leandrocosta.pro.b

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #2 from Leandro Costa --- Hello Michael Schwendt, thanks for your observations. The permissions on the files are because my data partition is ntfs, I will move the folder and make the suggested adjustments. -- You are receiving t

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt --- Have you tested this package at all? A simple "rpmbuild --rebuild pixiewps-20161229git-1.fc25.src.rpm" fails early. So, here are some more comments: $ rpmls -p pixiewps-20161229git-1.fc25.src.rpm

[Bug 1409138] Review Request: pixiewps - An offline WPS bruteforce utility

2016-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409138 Leandro Costa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced B