https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-validators-0.12.0-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2e8e0c2a4a
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-validators. You may commit to the
branch "f27" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #8 from William Moreno ---
>
> Package APPROVED!
Thanks for this review, please ping if you need a package review, the 3
packages you have listed are already aproved.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #7 from David Carlos ---
(In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #6)
> (In reply to David Carlos from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #4)
> > > > - Your License
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #6 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
(In reply to David Carlos from comment #5)
> (In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #4)
> > > - Your License field defines BSD as the package license, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #5 from David Carlos ---
(In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #4)
> > - Your License field defines BSD as the package license, but upstream uses
> > MIT.
> > I had notices that the upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #4 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
> - Your License field defines BSD as the package license, but upstream uses
> MIT.
> I had notices that the upstream setup.py file defines the license as BSD,
> but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
David Carlos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Maybe you could have a look at one of my packages waiting for review in
exchange?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529352
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529023
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
13 matches
Mail list logo