https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-3400d18f43 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #57 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #56 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Mattia,
Got it. I have run "fedpkg update --type newpackage --bugs 1812961" for f32.
Thank you very much for the quick response and explanation!
Yongkui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #55 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #54 from Mattia Verga ---
(In reply to yonhan from comment #52)
> hi Mattia, Robert-Andre,
>
> Thank you very much for the instructions and guidance!
>
> Today I switched to a new VM without the firewall restriction and
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #53 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #52 from yon...@cisco.com ---
hi Mattia, Robert-Andre,
Thank you very much for the instructions and guidance!
Today I switched to a new VM without the firewall restriction and successfully
fedpkg-cloned the openosc via SSH. And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #51 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #50 from Mattia Verga ---
Yonhan, the steps at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers should
work.
I suggest you to start over from the beginning, delete your local directory
where you cloned
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #49 from yon...@cisco.com ---
I discovered that on my vm20, I can ssh connect to IPv6 address without issue,
however, if its IPv4 address, then it will fail.
fedorapeople.org has IPv6 address, therefore, I can ssh to it directly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #48 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Sorry I can't help you much with this, I know nothing about networking stuff,
try asking for help on the fedora-devel mailing list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #47 from yon...@cisco.com ---
oh, I think I found the root cause. it is due to routing issue in my vm20.
debug2: resolving "pkgs.fedoraproject.org" port 22
debug2: ssh_connect_direct
debug1: Connecting to pkgs.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #46 from yon...@cisco.com ---
I think I have narrowed down the root cause for my vm20 not working with
"fedpkg clone ssh://". It must be due to firewall setting.
I have another VM which does not have this kind of strict firewall,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #45 from yon...@cisco.com ---
One question:
If I access this URL: https://pagure.io/settings#nav-basic-tab
Then I can see the below items that I can configure:
User Settings
Profile
Email Addresses
API Keys
SSH Keys
Preferences
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #44 from yon...@cisco.com ---
I can connect to yon...@fedorapeople.org via ssh successfully, but failed to
connect to pkgs.fedoraproject.org via ssh:
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-review-dir]$ ssh -vv yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #43 from yon...@cisco.com ---
oh, my bad. it should be fedorapeople.org, not fedoraproject.org. Now this ssh
connection to fedorapeople.org issue is fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #42 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Also I am trying to connect to fedoraproject.org via SSH.
I have generated public key pairs via ssh-keygen, and uploaded my
~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub into my FAS account.
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-scm]$ ssh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #41 from yon...@cisco.com ---
hi Robert-Andre,
I tried to use HTTP push: https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/http_push.html
Any user can generate API tokens with the commit ACL which reads in the UI as:
Commit to a git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #40 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 openosc]$ fedpkg push
Please visit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #39 from yon...@cisco.com ---
the above
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
yon...@cisco.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(yon...@cisco.com) |
--- Comment #38 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(yon...@cisco.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #36 from yon...@cisco.com ---
hi All,
I run into below error when cloning my openosc repo:
[rtd@bxb-rtd-vm20 fedora-scm]$ fedpkg -v clone openosc
Cloning ssh://yon...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc
Running: git clone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #35 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #33 from Mattia Verga ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #32)
> (In reply to Mattia Verga from comment #29)
> > Actually, I can't find any user neither in the Packager group or in the
> > Signed CLA Group with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #30 from Mattia Verga ---
...also, yon...@cisco.com has not been sponsored in the packager group and is
not in the signed CLA group
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #28 from yon...@cisco.com ---
This new ticket run into the exact same issue as the previous #26022 ticket.
#26818 New Repo for "rpms/openosc"
Closed: Invalid 2 hours ago by limb.
The Bugzilla bug's review is approved by a user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #27 from yon...@cisco.com ---
OK, I just created a new ticket:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26818
Let's see if this one can work for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #26 from Artur Iwicki ---
Check out the link to the pagure.io/releng ticket you posted earlier:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26022
> Closed as Invalid
> The Bugzilla bug's review is approved by a user that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #25 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Artur,
I haven't received any notification. Do you know how to check the status of the
open tickets?
Thanks,
Yongkui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #24 from yon...@cisco.com ---
HI Artur,
Thanks for the info. I will wait for the notification from pagure.
Thanks!
Yongkui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #23 from Artur Iwicki ---
Repositories on src.fedoraproject.org are created manually by members of the
Release Enginnering team in response to opened tickets. Your pagure.io/releng
ticket is still open. You'll need to wait a bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #22 from yon...@cisco.com ---
I also tried to clone it anonymously, failed with the below error message:
fedpkg -v clone -a openosc
Cloning https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openosc.git
Running: git clone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #21 from yon...@cisco.com ---
hi Robert-Andre,
I have successfully done the below:
vim ~/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf
fedpkg request-repo openosc 1812961
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26022
Then I run into the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #20 from yon...@cisco.com ---
hi Robert-Andre,
Thank you very much for the approval!
I think the next step for me is to follow the below wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
I will use the fedpkg tool to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #18 from Jeff Law ---
Robert-Andre,
Is there something Yongkui could be doing to move this forward? Red Hat's
tools team is definitely interested in poking at openosc to see if/how it can
be used to evaluate the effectiveness
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #17 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Robert,
I have updated the openosc.spec for the latest OpenOSC-1.0.2 version. and I
have changed to %autosetup -n OpenOSC-%{version} in the openosc.spec file. All
builds passed.
Spec file updated:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #16 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Regarding that OpenOSC-1.0.1 vs. openosc-1.0.1 issue, I prefer to always use
lower-case openosc, to avoid any such upper-case vs. lower-case issue.
When I download the tarball file, it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #15 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Spec file updated:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yonhan/openosc/fedora-31-x86_64/01337903-openosc/openosc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #14 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the comments!
Yes, I did try using "%autosetup -n OpenOSC-%{version}" in the openosc.spec
file, which however caused the below build error:
+ cd OpenOSC-1.0.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #13 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
%prep
%autosetup -n openosc-%{version}
the folder in the archive is OpenOSC-%{version} as I said before. The archive
in the SRPM is not the same as the one downloaded on Github, please fix that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
yon...@cisco.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yon...@cisco.com
--- Comment #12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package *not* approved. Sorry I'm tired, please fix the issues first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #9 from yon...@cisco.com ---
I wonder if there are further comments for this package request review.
Also, if someone can sponsor me, it would be greatly appreciated!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #8 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Mattia,
Thanks for the comments!
I checked the section about packaging static libraries, and I think I do need
the static library, and I put it in a separate openosc-static rpm. so it should
be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #6 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Spec file updated:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yonhan/openosc/fedora-31-x86_64/01305433-openosc/openosc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #5 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Artur,
Thanks for the comments! I will fix all of them.
Yongkui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #3 from yon...@cisco.com ---
(In reply to yonhan from comment #0)
> Spec URL:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yonhan/openosc/fedora-
> rawhide-x86_64/01303303-openosc/openosc.spec
> SRPM URL:
>
58 matches
Mail list logo
