https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jakarta-server-pages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
Fixed license tag, and bumped the obsoleted versions for both glassfish-jsp and
glassfish-jsp by 1.
Reported ASL 2.0 snafu also upstream:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsp-api/issues/180
Thanks for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #7 from Mat Booth ---
Oh cripes I just spotted one more minor problem:
On a fully up to date F33 system, the obsoletes are off by one:
$ rpm -q glassfish-jsp{,-api}
glassfish-jsp-2.3.4-8.fc33.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
Mat Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
Downgraded to 2.3.6, enabled JDTJavaCompiler (and AntJavaCompiler while I was
at it).
- Patch1 is adapted from glassfish-jsp but rebased for 2.3.6 with additional
enablement of AntJavaCompiler.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> Hm. Well, we could switch to shipping an older version of jsp-api for now
> (one that doesn't have the package name transition yet). According to an
> upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Hm. Well, we could switch to shipping an older version of jsp-api for now (one
that doesn't have the package name transition yet). According to an upstream
developer, those latest "stable" releases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #2 from Mat Booth ---
Issues:
1)
Hmm, just like jakarta-servlet package, half the source files have "ASL 2.0"
headers instead of the "EPL-2.0 or GPLv2", so I think the license field would
be more accurate as this:
ASL 2.0 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
Bug 1868992 depends on bug 1868991, which changed state.
Bug 1868991 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-el - Jakarta Expression Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868991
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1868991
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
--- Comment #1 from Mat Booth ---
Ah yeah looks like this one requires:
mvn(jakarta.el:jakarta.el-api)
mvn(jakarta.servlet:jakarta.servlet-api)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
Mat Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
13 matches
Mail list logo
